Literature DB >> 19901087

Informatics in radiology: comparison of logistic regression and artificial neural network models in breast cancer risk estimation.

Turgay Ayer1, Jagpreet Chhatwal, Oguzhan Alagoz, Charles E Kahn, Ryan W Woods, Elizabeth S Burnside.   

Abstract

Computer models in medical diagnosis are being developed to help physicians differentiate between healthy patients and patients with disease. These models can aid in successful decision making by allowing calculation of disease likelihood on the basis of known patient characteristics and clinical test results. Two of the most frequently used computer models in clinical risk estimation are logistic regression and an artificial neural network. A study was conducted to review and compare these two models, elucidate the advantages and disadvantages of each, and provide criteria for model selection. The two models were used for estimation of breast cancer risk on the basis of mammographic descriptors and demographic risk factors. Although they demonstrated similar performance, the two models have unique characteristics-strengths as well as limitations-that must be considered and may prove complementary in contributing to improved clinical decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19901087      PMCID: PMC3709515          DOI: 10.1148/rg.301095057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  21 in total

1.  Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology.

Authors:  Nancy A Obuchowski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Logistic regression and artificial neural network classification models: a methodology review.

Authors:  Stephan Dreiseitl; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 5.  Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes.

Authors:  J V Tu
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories.

Authors:  P W Wilson; R B D'Agostino; D Levy; A M Belanger; H Silbershatz; W B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-05-12       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Survival analysis of censored data: neural network analysis detection of complex interactions between variables.

Authors:  M De Laurentiis; P M Ravdin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Hemorrhagic transformation of ischemic stroke: prediction with CT perfusion.

Authors:  Richard I Aviv; Christopher D d'Esterre; Blake D Murphy; Julia J Hopyan; Brian Buck; Gabriella Mallia; Vivian Li; Liying Zhang; Sean P Symons; Ting-Yim Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  A logistic regression model based on the national mammography database format to aid breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Jagpreet Chhatwal; Oguzhan Alagoz; Mary J Lindstrom; Charles E Kahn; Katherine A Shaffer; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Prediction of prostate cancer volume using prostate-specific antigen levels, transrectal ultrasound, and systematic sextant biopsies.

Authors:  M K Terris; D J Haney; I M Johnstone; J E McNeal; T A Stamey
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  42 in total

1.  A comparison of logistic regression analysis and an artificial neural network using the BI-RADS lexicon for ultrasonography in conjunction with introbserver variability.

Authors:  Sun Mi Kim; Heon Han; Jeong Mi Park; Yoon Jung Choi; Hoi Soo Yoon; Jung Hee Sohn; Moon Hee Baek; Yoon Nam Kim; Young Moon Chae; Jeon Jong June; Jiwon Lee; Yong Hwan Jeon
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Transfer Learning with Convolutional Neural Networks for Classification of Abdominal Ultrasound Images.

Authors:  Phillip M Cheng; Harshawn S Malhi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  A comprehensive methodology for determining the most informative mammographic features.

Authors:  Yirong Wu; Oguzhan Alagoz; Mehmet U S Ayvaci; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; David J Vanness; Ryan Woods; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Lung texture in serial thoracic computed tomography scans: correlation of radiomics-based features with radiation therapy dose and radiation pneumonitis development.

Authors:  Alexandra Cunliffe; Samuel G Armato; Richard Castillo; Ngoc Pham; Thomas Guerrero; Hania A Al-Hallaq
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Machine learning and deep learning techniques to support clinical diagnosis of arboviral diseases: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sebastião Rogério da Silva Neto; Thomás Tabosa Oliveira; Igor Vitor Teixeira; Samuel Benjamin Aguiar de Oliveira; Vanderson Souza Sampaio; Theo Lynn; Patricia Takako Endo
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2022-01-13

Review 6.  Next-generation prognostic assessment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Ashley D Staton; Jean L Koff; Qiushi Chen; Turgay Ayer; Christopher R Flowers
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.404

7.  Population-specific prognostic models are needed to stratify outcomes for African-Americans with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Qiushi Chen; Turgay Ayer; Loretta J Nastoupil; Jean L Koff; Ashley D Staton; Jagpreet Chhatwal; Christopher R Flowers
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2015-12-15

8.  A fitting machine learning prediction model for short-term mortality following percutaneous catheterization intervention: a nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  Meng-Hsuen Hsieh; Shih-Yi Lin; Cheng-Li Lin; Meng-Ju Hsieh; Wu-Huei Hsu; Shu-Woei Ju; Cheng-Chieh Lin; Chung Y Hsu; Chia-Hung Kao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

9.  Risk Prediction of Barrett's Esophagus in a Taiwanese Health Examination Center Based on Regression Models.

Authors:  Po-Hsiang Lin; Jer-Guang Hsieh; Hsien-Chung Yu; Jyh-Horng Jeng; Chiao-Lin Hsu; Chien-Hua Chen; Pin-Chieh Wu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Machine Learning Demonstrates High Accuracy for Disease Diagnosis and Prognosis in Plastic Surgery.

Authors:  Angelos Mantelakis; Yannis Assael; Parviz Sorooshian; Ankur Khajuria
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.