Literature DB >> 7819580

Survival analysis of censored data: neural network analysis detection of complex interactions between variables.

M De Laurentiis1, P M Ravdin.   

Abstract

Neural networks can be used as pattern recognition systems in complex data sets. We are exploring their utility in performing survival analysis to predict time to relapse or death. This technique has the potential to find easily some types of very complex interactions in data that would not be easily recognized by conventional statistical methods. In this paper we demonstrate that there are several ways neural networks can be used to find three-way interactions among variables. Thus, in data sets where such complex interactions exist, neural networks may find utility in detecting such interactions and in helping to produce predictive models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7819580     DOI: 10.1007/bf00666212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  8 in total

Review 1.  Consensus statement: treatment of early-stage breast cancer. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1992

Review 2.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine.

Authors:  M H Zweig; G Campbell
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Improved prediction of protein secondary structure by use of sequence profiles and neural networks.

Authors:  B Rost; C Sander
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A plain man's guide to the proportional hazards model.

Authors:  R Tibshirani
Journal:  Clin Invest Med       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 0.825

Review 5.  RECPAM analysis of prognostic factors in patients with stage III breast cancer.

Authors:  C Erlichman; P Warde; T Gadalla; A Ciampi; T Baskerville
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  A practical application of neural network analysis for predicting outcome of individual breast cancer patients.

Authors:  P M Ravdin; G M Clark
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  A demonstration that breast cancer recurrence can be predicted by neural network analysis.

Authors:  P M Ravdin; G M Clark; S G Hilsenbeck; M A Owens; P Vendely; M R Pandian; W L McGuire
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Analysis of the clinical variables driving decision in an artificial neural network trained to identify the presence of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  W G Baxt
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.721

  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  Artificial intelligence for clinicians.

Authors:  P J Drew; J R Monson
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  An artificial neural network improves prediction of observed survival in patients with laryngeal squamous carcinoma.

Authors:  Andrew S Jones; Azzam G F Taktak; Timothy R Helliwell; John E Fenton; Martin A Birchall; David J Husband; Anthony C Fisher
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Application of artificial neural network-based survival analysis on two breast cancer datasets.

Authors:  Chih-Lin Chi; W Nick Street; William H Wolberg
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

4.  Artificial neural network is superior to MELD in predicting mortality of patients with end-stage liver disease.

Authors:  A Cucchetti; M Vivarelli; N D Heaton; S Phillips; F Piscaglia; L Bolondi; G La Barba; M R Foxton; M Rela; J O'Grady; A D Pinna
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Prognostic factors: rationale and methods of analysis and integration.

Authors:  G M Clark; S G Hilsenbeck; P M Ravdin; M De Laurentiis; C K Osborne
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Informatics in radiology: comparison of logistic regression and artificial neural network models in breast cancer risk estimation.

Authors:  Turgay Ayer; Jagpreet Chhatwal; Oguzhan Alagoz; Charles E Kahn; Ryan W Woods; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  A predictive index of axillary nodal involvement in operable breast cancer.

Authors:  M De Laurentiis; C Gallo; S De Placido; F Perrone; G Pettinato; G Petrella; C Carlomagno; L Panico; P Delrio; A R Bianco
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 8.  Neural Networks for Survival Prediction in Medicine Using Prognostic Factors: A Review and Critical Appraisal.

Authors:  Georgios Kantidakis; Audinga-Dea Hazewinkel; Marta Fiocco
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  Neural network analysis of combined conventional and experimental prognostic markers in prostate cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  R N Naguib; M C Robinson; D E Neal; F C Hamdy
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.