Literature DB >> 8892489

Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes.

J V Tu1.   

Abstract

Artificial neural networks are algorithms that can be used to perform nonlinear statistical modeling and provide a new alternative to logistic regression, the most commonly used method for developing predictive models for dichotomous outcomes in medicine. Neural networks offer a number of advantages, including requiring less formal statistical training, ability to implicitly detect complex nonlinear relationships between dependent and independent variables, ability to detect all possible interactions between predictor variables, and the availability of multiple training algorithms. Disadvantages include its "black box" nature, greater computational burden, proneness to overfitting, and the empirical nature of model development. An overview of the features of neural networks and logistic regression is presented, and the advantages and disadvantages of using this modeling technique are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8892489     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00002-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  175 in total

1.  Stratification of adverse outcomes by preoperative risk factors in coronary artery bypass graft patients: an artificial neural network prediction model.

Authors:  Chee-Fah Chong; Yu-Chuan Li; Tzong-Luen Wang; Hang Chang
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

2.  Bayesian probabilistic network modeling of remifentanil and propofol interaction on wakeup time after closed-loop controlled anesthesia.

Authors:  Ulrich Bothtner; Stewart E Milne; Gavin N C Kenny; Michael Georgieff; Stefan Schraag
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  [Artificial neural networks. Theory and applications in anesthesia, intensive care and emergency medicine].

Authors:  M Traeger; A Eberhart; G Geldner; A M Morin; C Putzke; H Wulf; L H Eberhart
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  A comparison of logistic regression analysis and an artificial neural network using the BI-RADS lexicon for ultrasonography in conjunction with introbserver variability.

Authors:  Sun Mi Kim; Heon Han; Jeong Mi Park; Yoon Jung Choi; Hoi Soo Yoon; Jung Hee Sohn; Moon Hee Baek; Yoon Nam Kim; Young Moon Chae; Jeon Jong June; Jiwon Lee; Yong Hwan Jeon
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Neural network approaches to grade adult depression.

Authors:  Subhagata Chattopadhyay; Preetisha Kaur; Fethi Rabhi; U Rajendra Acharya
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Variation among internet based calculators in predicting spontaneous resolution of vesicoureteral reflux.

Authors:  Jonathan C Routh; Edward M Gong; Glenn M Cannon; Richard N Yu; Patricio C Gargollo; Caleb P Nelson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Combining neural network and genetic algorithm for prediction of lung sounds.

Authors:  Inan Güler; Hüseyin Polat; Uçman Ergün
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  Artificial neural networks in prediction of bone density among post-menopausal women.

Authors:  M Sadatsafavi; A Moayyeri; A Soltani; B Larijani; M Nouraie; S Akhondzadeh
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.256

9.  A comparative analysis of multi-level computer-assisted decision making systems for traumatic injuries.

Authors:  Soo-Yeon Ji; Rebecca Smith; Toan Huynh; Kayvan Najarian
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Informatics in radiology: comparison of logistic regression and artificial neural network models in breast cancer risk estimation.

Authors:  Turgay Ayer; Jagpreet Chhatwal; Oguzhan Alagoz; Charles E Kahn; Ryan W Woods; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 5.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.