Literature DB >> 16571715

Patient preferences and adherence to colorectal cancer screening in an urban population.

Randi L Wolf1, Charles E Basch, Corey H Brouse, Celia Shmukler, Steven Shea.   

Abstract

We measured patient preferences for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening strategies and actual receipt of alternative CRC screening tests among an urban minority sample participating in an intervention study. The fecal occult blood test was the most preferred test, reportedly owing to its convenience and the noninvasive nature. For individuals who obtained a test that was other than their stated preference (41.1%), reasons for this discordance may be due to physician preferences that override patient preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16571715      PMCID: PMC1470583          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.049684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  11 in total

1.  Colorectal cancer prevention 2000: screening recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology.

Authors:  D K Rex; D A Johnson; D A Lieberman; R W Burt; A Sonnenberg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Telephone outreach to increase colorectal cancer screening in an urban minority population.

Authors:  Charles E Basch; Randi L Wolf; Corey H Brouse; Celia Shmukler; Alfred Neugut; Lawrence T DeCarlo; Steven Shea
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Attitudes toward colorectal cancer screening tests.

Authors:  B S Ling; M A Moskowitz; D Wachs; B Pearson; P C Schroy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  L E Leard; T J Savides; T G Ganiats
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 0.493

5.  Patient preferences for colon cancer screening.

Authors:  M Pignone; D Bucholtz; R Harris
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult U.S. population.

Authors:  Laura C Seeff; Marion R Nadel; Carrie N Klabunde; Trevor Thompson; Jean A Shapiro; Sally W Vernon; Ralph J Coates
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence.

Authors:  Sidney Winawer; Robert Fletcher; Douglas Rex; John Bond; Randall Burt; Joseph Ferrucci; Theodore Ganiats; Theodore Levin; Steven Woolf; David Johnson; Lynne Kirk; Scott Litin; Clifford Simmang
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 8.  Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Melissa Rich; Steven M Teutsch; Alfred O Berg; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2003.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Vilma Cokkinides; Harmon J Eyre
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Colorectal cancer screening: clinical applications.

Authors:  Judith M E Walsh; Jonathan P Terdiman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  38 in total

1.  Preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests and screening test use in a large multispecialty primary care practice.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Amy McQueen; L Kay Bartholomew; Anthony J Greisinger; Sharon P Coan; Ronald Myers; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Measuring Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening: What are the Implications for Moving Forward?

Authors:  Deborah Marshall; S Elizabeth McGregor; Gillian Currie
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Colorectal Cancer Screening Preferences among Black and Latino Primary Care Patients.

Authors:  Sumedha V Chablani; Noah Cohen; Drusilla White; Steven H Itzkowitz; Katherine DuHamel; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2017-10

4.  Risk perception and preference for prevention of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Sukyung Chung; Kala Mehta; Martha Shumway; Jennifer Alvidrez; Eliseo J Perez-Stable
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 5.725

5.  The effects of test preference, test access, and navigation on colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Constantine Daskalakis; Sally W Vernon; Randa Sifri; Melissa DiCarlo; James Cocroft; Jocelyn Andrel Sendecki; Ronald E Myers
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Patient perceptions of stool DNA testing for pan-digestive cancer screening: a survey questionnaire.

Authors:  Dennis Yang; Shauna L Hillman; Ann M Harris; Pamela S Sinicrope; Mary E Devens; David A Ahlquist
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Colorectal cancer screening by primary care physicians: recommendations and practices, 2006-2007.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; David Lanier; Marion R Nadel; Caroline McLeod; Gigi Yuan; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Differences in microbial signatures between rectal mucosal biopsies and rectal swabs.

Authors:  Félix Araújo-Pérez; Amber N McCoy; Charles Okechukwu; Ian M Carroll; Kevin M Smith; Kim Jeremiah; Robert S Sandler; Gary N Asher; Temitope O Keku
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2012-10-11

9.  Community-based preferences for stool cards versus colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Ann C DeBourcy; Scott Lichtenberger; Susanne Felton; Kiel T Butterfield; Dennis J Ahnen; Thomas D Denberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Preferences for colorectal cancer screening strategies: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  L Hol; E W de Bekker-Grob; L van Dam; B Donkers; E J Kuipers; J D F Habbema; E W Steyerberg; M E van Leerdam; M L Essink-Bot
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.