Literature DB >> 19898861

Impact of difference in the definition of extranodal spread on the outcome of node-positive patients with gastric cancer.

Kenji Nakamura1, Yuichi Okamoto, Hideo Matsui, Hiroyasu Makuuchi, Kyoji Ogoshi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Previous studies have reported that extranodal spread is a prognostic factor in patients with several solid cancers. However, the definition of extranodal spread varies with the reporting investigator and has not been standardized yet. Therefore, we selected several widely used definitions from previous reports and comparatively assessed the clinicopathologic significance of these definitions.
METHODS: Extranodal spread in the 103 node-positive patients who had received curative resections for gastric cancer was classified into two groups, viz., (a) capsule rupture, where cancer cells infiltrated into the perinodal fatty tissue beyond the capsule of the involved lymph node, and (b) no capsule rupture, where nests of cancer cells were detected demonstrable in adjacent tissues around the metastatic lymph node without rupture of the capsule.
RESULTS: Sixty-five (63.1%) of the 103 patients showed extranodal spread. Of the 65 patients, 50 patients showed the capsule rupture type and 15 showed the no capsule rupture type of extranodal spread. The 5-year survival rate was significantly poorer in the capsule rupture group as compared with that in the no capsule rupture group and extranodal spread-negative group (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). In regard to the mode of recurrence, the rate of peritoneal recurrence was significantly higher in the capsule rupture group (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: In the assessment of patients with extranodal spread, it is considered important to classify the patients based on the status of extranodal spread into the capsule rupture group and no capsule rupture group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19898861     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-009-0564-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  23 in total

1.  Peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer with particular reference to lymphatic advancement; extranodal invasion is a significant risk factor for peritoneal metastasis.

Authors:  T Tanaka; K Kumagai; K Shimizu; K Masuo; K Yamagata
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Soft tissue deposits in neck dissections of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: prospective analysis of prevalence, survival, and its implications.

Authors:  Jemy Jose; James W Moor; Andrew P Coatesworth; Colin Johnston; Ken MacLennan
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-02

3.  Extranodal metastasis is an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  T Etoh; M Sasako; K Ishikawa; H Katai; T Sano; T Shimoda
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Extracapsular lymph node involvement in node-positive patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or gastroesophageal junction.

Authors:  Sjoerd M Lagarde; Fiebo J W ten Kate; Daan J de Boer; Olivier R C Busch; Hugo Obertop; J Jan B van Lanschot
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Prognostic significance of perinodal extension in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Won Hyuk Choi; Sungsoo Kim; Jiayun Shen; Jae Ho Cheong; Woo Jin Hyung; Yong Il Kim; Seung Ho Choi; Sung Hoon Noh; Chan Il Park
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Prognostic significance of histologic host response in cancer of the larynx or hypopharynx.

Authors:  S H Bennett; J W Futrell; J A Roth; R C Hoye; A S Ketcham
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Prognostic significance of extranodal microscopic foci discontinuous with primary lesion in rectal cancer.

Authors:  H Ueno; H Mochizuki; S Tamakuma
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Cervical metastases in upper aerodigestive tract squamous cell carcinoma: histopathologic analysis and reporting.

Authors:  Jemy Jose; Andrew P Coatesworth; Ken MacLennan
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.147

9.  Implications of extranodal spread in node positive breast cancer: a review of survival and local recurrence.

Authors:  J A Bucci; C W Kennedy; J Burn; D J Gillett; H L Carmalt; M J Donnellan; M G Joseph; S C Pendlebury
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.380

10.  Extranodal connective tissue invasion and the expression of desmosomal glycoprotein 1 in squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus.

Authors:  S Natsugoe; J Mueller; F Kijima; K Aridome; M Shimada; K Shirao; C Kusano; M Baba; H Yoshinaka; T Fukumoto; T Aikou
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Extranodal Extension of Nodal Metastases Is a Poor Prognostic Indicator in Gastric Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicola Veronese; Matteo Fassan; Laura D Wood; Brendon Stubbs; Marco Solmi; Paola Capelli; Antonio Pea; Alessia Nottegar; Giuseppe Sergi; Enzo Manzato; Sara Carraro; Marco Maruzzo; Ivana Cataldo; Fabio Bagante; Mattia Barbareschi; Liang Cheng; Maria Bencivenga; Giovanni de Manzoni; Claudio Luchini
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Tomonori Akagi; Norio Shiraishi; Seigo Kitano
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 6.639

3.  Prognostic significance and the role in TNM stage of extranodal metastasis within regional lymph nodes station in gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiao-Long Chen; Lin-Yong Zhao; Lian Xue; Yu-Hui Xu; Wei-Han Zhang; Kai Liu; Xin-Zu Chen; Kun Yang; Bo Zhang; Zhi-Xin Chen; Jia-Ping Chen; Zong-Guang Zhou; Jian-Kun Hu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-10-11

4.  Tumour deposits are a significant prognostic factor in gastric cancer - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cristina Graham Martínez; Nikki Knijn; Marcel Verheij; Iris D Nagtegaal; Rachel S van der Post
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 5.087

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.