Literature DB >> 17252555

Prognostic significance of perinodal extension in gastric cancer.

Won Hyuk Choi1, Sungsoo Kim, Jiayun Shen, Jae Ho Cheong, Woo Jin Hyung, Yong Il Kim, Seung Ho Choi, Sung Hoon Noh, Chan Il Park.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The grouping of patients who have a poor prognosis is important in determining a treatment strategy. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathologic features and prognosis in patients with perinodal extension, with a focus on the difference of survival between homogenous groups.
METHODS: This study included a total of 1,092 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma from 1997 to 2004 at the Department of Surgery, Yongdong Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine.
RESULTS: One hundred sixty-one patients had perinodal extension. The incidence of perinodal extension was positively correlated for T and N stages. Perinodal extension was identified as an independent prognostic factor and had more influence on survival than T and N stages. Patients who had nodal metastasis without serosal exposure and who had serosal exposure without nodal metastasis were selected as homogenous groups, and there was no difference of survival between these groups. However, when the nodal metastasis group was subdivided according to the perinodal extension, perinodal extension subgroup had significant poorer prognosis than no perinodal extension subgroup.
CONCLUSIONS: The perinodal extension was the most important independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer, and should be included in the TNM gastric cancer staging system. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17252555     DOI: 10.1002/jso.20734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  5 in total

1.  Extended lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer is crucial.

Authors:  Lorenzo Ferri
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Extranodal Extension of Nodal Metastases Is a Poor Prognostic Indicator in Gastric Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicola Veronese; Matteo Fassan; Laura D Wood; Brendon Stubbs; Marco Solmi; Paola Capelli; Antonio Pea; Alessia Nottegar; Giuseppe Sergi; Enzo Manzato; Sara Carraro; Marco Maruzzo; Ivana Cataldo; Fabio Bagante; Mattia Barbareschi; Liang Cheng; Maria Bencivenga; Giovanni de Manzoni; Claudio Luchini
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Impact of difference in the definition of extranodal spread on the outcome of node-positive patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kenji Nakamura; Yuichi Okamoto; Hideo Matsui; Hiroyasu Makuuchi; Kyoji Ogoshi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-11-07       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Clinicopathologic Significance of Extranodal Tumor Extension in Colorectal Adenocarcinoma with Regional Lymph Node Metastasis.

Authors:  Hyunsung Kim; Abdul Rehman; Yumin Chung; Kijong Yi; Young Chan Wi; Yeseul Kim; Kiseok Jang; Se Min Jang; Seung Sam Paik
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 2.260

5.  Extranodal soft tissue metastasis as an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer patients aged under 70 years after curative gastrectomy.

Authors:  Nannan Zhang; Jingyu Deng; Weilin Sun; Yingxin Du; Shiwei Guo; Huihui Bai; Huifang Liu; Han Liang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.