Literature DB >> 9510311

Prognostic significance of extranodal microscopic foci discontinuous with primary lesion in rectal cancer.

H Ueno1, H Mochizuki, S Tamakuma.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The most common recurrence after curative resection of rectal carcinoma originates from tiny, undetectable residual foci within the pelvic cavity. The significance and methods used to predict the presence of extramural and extranodal microscopic cancer foci discontinuous with the main lesion of rectal cancers were investigated.
METHODS: Four hundred twenty-seven patients who underwent resection of rectal carcinoma were studied. All resected specimens were examined for histologic evidence of extramural cancer separate from the main lesion.
RESULTS: Extramural cancers not in continuity with the main rectal lesion were classified as follows: 1) extranodal microscopic cancers; 2) large tumor nodules; 3) lymph node metastases. Each classification was found to influence long-term prognosis. Among them, microscopic cancer was thought to be especially relevant because, by virtue of its microscopic nature, it may be left in the pelvic cavity, causing local recurrence. The existence of large tumor nodules and metastatic lymph nodes correlated closely with the presence of microscopic cancer. Because large tumor nodules and lymph node metastases are possibly detectable during the operation by palpation and may be analyzed by microscopic frozen sections, they might be useful predictors of the presence of microscopic cancers.
CONCLUSIONS: In cases with extensive local rectal cancer spread, the nerve-sparing rectal resection that omits lateral dissection may be insufficient for local control because of incomplete removal of occult microscopic cancer, resulting in local recurrence. Presence of microscopic cancer correlates closely with large tumor nodules and metastatic lymph nodes. Intraoperative frozen section investigations may, thus, help in deciding on extent of location resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9510311     DOI: 10.1007/BF02236896

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  20 in total

1.  Microscopic spread of low rectal cancer in regions of the mesorectum: detailed pathological assessment with whole-mount sections.

Authors:  Zhao Wang; Zongguang Zhou; Cun Wang; Gaoping Zhao; Youdai Chen; Hongkai Gao; Xuelian Zheng; Rong Wang; Daiyun Chen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Microscopic cancer cell spread in gastric cancer: whole-section analysis of mesogastrium.

Authors:  Atsuko Nagatomo; Nobutsugu Abe; Hirohisa Takeuchi; Osamu Yanagida; Tadahiko Masaki; Toshiyuki Mori; Masanori Sugiyama; Yasuo Ohkura; Yasunori Fujioka; Yutaka Atomi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  The prognostic impact of extracapsular lymph node involvement in rectal cancer patients: Implications for staging and adjuvant treatment strategies.

Authors:  J Brabender; E Bollschweiler; A H Hölscher; K Strobel; C Gutschow; K Prenzel; P Grimminger; U Drebber; W Schröder; R Metzger; D Vallböhmer
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Debating deposits: an interobserver variability study of lymph nodes and pericolonic tumor deposits in colonic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jonathan B Rock; M Kay Washington; N Volkan Adsay; Joel K Greenson; Elizabeth A Montgomery; Marie E Robert; Rhonda K Yantiss; Amy M Lehman; Wendy L Frankel
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  Prognostic value of tumor shrinkage versus fragmentation following radiochemotherapy and surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Monirath Hav; Louis Libbrecht; Karen Geboes; Liesbeth Ferdinande; Tom Boterberg; Wim Ceelen; Piet Pattyn; Claude Cuvelier
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Tumor deposits in rectal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiation are associated with poor prognosis.

Authors:  Purva Gopal; Pengcheng Lu; Gregory D Ayers; Alan J Herline; Mary K Washington
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  Feasibility of laparoscopic D3 lymphadenectomy for male rectosigmoid cancer with clinically positive lymph nodes.

Authors:  Jin-Tung Liang; Kuo-Chin Huang; Hong-Shiee Lai; Po-Huang Lee; Chia-Tung Sun
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Lymph node negative colorectal cancers with isolated tumor deposits should be classified and treated as stage III.

Authors:  E J Th Belt; M F M van Stijn; H Bril; E S M de Lange-de Klerk; G A Meijer; S Meijer; H B A C Stockmann
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Microscopic spread of low rectal cancer in regions of mesorectum: pathologic assessment with whole-mount sections.

Authors:  Zhao Wang; Zong-Guang Zhou; Cun Wang; Gao-Ping Zhao; You-Dai Chen; Hong-Kai Gao; Xue-Lian Zheng; Rong Wang; Dai-Yun Chen; Wei-Ping Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Impact of difference in the definition of extranodal spread on the outcome of node-positive patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kenji Nakamura; Yuichi Okamoto; Hideo Matsui; Hiroyasu Makuuchi; Kyoji Ogoshi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-11-07       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.