Literature DB >> 19897749

Recurrent selection on the Winters sex-ratio genes in Drosophila simulans.

Sarah B Kingan1, Daniel Garrigan, Daniel L Hartl.   

Abstract

Selfish genes, such as meiotic drive elements, propagate themselves through a population without increasing the fitness of host organisms. X-linked (or Y-linked) meiotic drive elements reduce the transmission of the Y (X) chromosome and skew progeny and population sex ratios, leading to intense conflict among genomic compartments. Drosophila simulans is unusual in having a least three distinct systems of X chromosome meiotic drive. Here, we characterize naturally occurring genetic variation at the Winters sex-ratio driver (Distorter on the X or Dox), its progenitor gene (Mother of Dox or MDox), and its suppressor gene (Not Much Yang or Nmy), which have been previously mapped and characterized. We survey three North American populations as well as 13 globally distributed strains and present molecular polymorphism data at the three loci. We find that all three genes show signatures of selection in North America, judging from levels of polymorphism and skews in the site-frequency spectrum. These signatures likely result from the biased transmission of the driver and selection on the suppressor for the maintenance of equal sex ratios. Coalescent modeling indicates that the timing of selection is more recent than the age of the alleles, suggesting that the driver and suppressor are coevolving under an evolutionary "arms race." None of the Winters sex-ratio genes are fixed in D. simulans, and at all loci we find ancestral alleles, which lack the gene insertions and exhibit high levels of nucleotide polymorphism compared to the derived alleles. In addition, we find several "null" alleles that have mutations on the derived Dox background, which result in loss of drive function. We discuss the possible causes of the maintenance of presence-absence polymorphism in the Winters sex-ratio genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19897749      PMCID: PMC2815921          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.109.109587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  54 in total

1.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

Review 2.  Estimating recombination rates from population-genetic data.

Authors:  Michael P H Stumpf; Gilean A T McVean
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Evolution of autosomal suppression of the sex-ratio trait in Drosophila.

Authors:  Suzana Casaccia Vaz; Antonio Bernardo Carvalho
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The estimation of the number and the length distribution of gene conversion tracts from population DNA sequence data.

Authors:  E Betrán; J Rozas; A Navarro; A Barbadilla
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Estimating the recombination parameter of a finite population model without selection.

Authors:  R R Hudson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Sex-ratio segregation distortion associated with reproductive isolation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Y Tao; D L Hartl; C C Laurie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Population Dynamics of the Segregation Distorter Polymorphism of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Sex chromosomes and speciation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Daven C Presgraves
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 11.639

10.  A sex-ratio meiotic drive system in Drosophila simulans. II: an X-linked distorter.

Authors:  Yun Tao; Luciana Araripe; Sarah B Kingan; Yeyan Ke; Hailian Xiao; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Sex chromosome drive.

Authors:  Quentin Helleu; Pierre R Gérard; Catherine Montchamp-Moreau
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  The Red Queen and King in finite populations.

Authors:  Carl Veller; Laura K Hayward; Christian Hilbe; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A fast-evolving X-linked duplicate of importin-α2 is overexpressed in sex-ratio drive in Drosophila neotestacea.

Authors:  Kathleen E Pieper; Robert L Unckless; Kelly A Dyer
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Meiotic drive mechanisms: lessons from Drosophila.

Authors:  Cécile Courret; Ching-Ho Chang; Kevin H-C Wei; Catherine Montchamp-Moreau; Amanda M Larracuente
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Meiotic drive reduces egg-to-adult viability in stalk-eyed flies.

Authors:  Sam Ronan Finnegan; Nathan Joseph White; Dixon Koh; M Florencia Camus; Kevin Fowler; Andrew Pomiankowski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Gene flow mediates the role of sex chromosome meiotic drive during complex speciation.

Authors:  Colin D Meiklejohn; Emily L Landeen; Kathleen E Gordon; Thomas Rzatkiewicz; Sarah B Kingan; Anthony J Geneva; Jeffrey P Vedanayagam; Christina A Muirhead; Daniel Garrigan; David L Stern; Daven C Presgraves
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Natural variation of the Y chromosome suppresses sex ratio distortion and modulates testis-specific gene expression in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  A T Branco; Y Tao; D L Hartl; B Lemos
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  An X-linked sex ratio distorter in Drosophila simulans that kills or incapacitates both noncarrier sperm and sons.

Authors:  William R Rice
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 9.  Resistance to natural and synthetic gene drive systems.

Authors:  Tom A R Price; Nikolai Windbichler; Robert L Unckless; Andreas Sutter; Jan-Niklas Runge; Perran A Ross; Andrew Pomiankowski; Nicole L Nuckolls; Catherine Montchamp-Moreau; Nicole Mideo; Oliver Y Martin; Andri Manser; Mathieu Legros; Amanda M Larracuente; Luke Holman; John Godwin; Neil Gemmell; Cécile Courret; Anna Buchman; Luke G Barrett; Anna K Lindholm
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Convergently recruited nuclear transport retrogenes are male biased in expression and evolving under positive selection in Drosophila.

Authors:  Charles Tracy; Javier Río; Mansi Motiwale; Shawn M Christensen; Esther Betrán
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.