Literature DB >> 19894000

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over bilateral hemispheres enhances motor function and training effect of paretic hand in patients after stroke.

Naoyuki Takeuchi1, Takeo Tada, Masahiko Toshima, Yuichiro Matsuo, Katsunori Ikoma.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The interhemispheric competition model proposes that the functional recovery of motor deficits in patients after stroke can be achieved by increasing the excitability of the affected hemisphere or decreasing the excitability of the unaffected hemisphere. We investigated whether bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation might improve the paretic hand in patients after stroke.
DESIGN: A double-blind study. PATIENTS: Thirty patients with chronic subcortical stroke.
METHODS: The patients were randomly assigned to receive 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the unaffected hemisphere, 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the affected hemisphere, or bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation comprising both the 1 Hz and 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. All patients underwent motor training following repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.
RESULTS: Bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation immediately improved acceleration in the paretic hand. Compared with 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation decreased the inhibitory function of the affected motor cortex and enhanced the effect of motor training on pinch force. Moreover, this effect of motor training lasted for one week. On the other hand, 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation had no effect on the motor function.
CONCLUSION: Bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improved the motor training effect on the paretic hand of patients after stroke more than unilateral stimulation in pinch force; this might indicate a new neurorehabilitative strategy for stroke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19894000     DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Med        ISSN: 1650-1977            Impact factor:   2.912


  35 in total

Review 1.  Predictors and assessment of cognitive dysfunction resulting from ischaemic stroke.

Authors:  Rebecca F Gottesman; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 2.  Transcranial magnetic simulation in the treatment of migraine.

Authors:  Richard B Lipton; Starr H Pearlman
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 3.  Noninvasive brain stimulation in neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Marco Sandrini; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2013

Review 4.  Invasive neurostimulation in stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; Andre Machado
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.620

5.  Amplitude and timing of somatosensory cortex activity in task-specific focal hand dystonia.

Authors:  Rebecca Dolberg; Leighton B N Hinkley; Susanne Honma; Zhao Zhu; Anne M Findlay; Nancy N Byl; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 6.  Understanding and enhancing motor recovery after stroke using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Erik H Hoyer; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 7.  Neurochemical changes underpinning the development of adjunct therapies in recovery after stroke: A role for GABA?

Authors:  Ainslie Johnstone; Jacob M Levenstein; Emily L Hinson; Charlotte J Stagg
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 6.200

8.  rTMS with motor training modulates cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuits in stroke patients.

Authors:  Won Hyuk Chang; Yun-Hee Kim; Woo-Kyoung Yoo; Kyoung-Hyup Goo; Chang-Hyun Park; Sung Tae Kim; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 9.  Brain networks and their relevance for stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Adrian G Guggisberg; Philipp J Koch; Friedhelm C Hummel; Cathrin M Buetefisch
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 10.  Neuromodulation for brain disorders: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Matthew D Johnson; Hubert H Lim; Theoden I Netoff; Allison T Connolly; Nessa Johnson; Abhrajeet Roy; Abbey Holt; Kelvin O Lim; James R Carey; Jerrold L Vitek; Bin He
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.