Literature DB >> 24353109

Invasive neurostimulation in stroke rehabilitation.

Ela B Plow1, Andre Machado.   

Abstract

The last decade has seen a growing interest in adjuvant treatments that synergistically influence mechanisms underlying rehabilitation of paretic upper limb in stroke. One such approach is invasive neurostimulation of spared cortices at the periphery of a lesion. Studies in animals have shown that during training of paretic limb, adjuvant stimulation targeting the peri-infarct circuitry enhances mechanisms of its reorganization, generating functional advantage. Success of early animal studies and clinical reports, however, failed to translate to a phase III clinical trial. As lesions in humans are diffuse, unlike many animal models, peri-infarct circuitry may not be a feasible, or consistent target across most. Instead, alternate mechanisms, such as changing transcallosal inhibition between hemispheres, or reorganization of other viable regions in motor control, may hold greater potential. Here, we review comprehensive mechanisms of clinical recovery and factors that govern which mechanism(s) become operative when. We suggest novel approaches that take into account a patient's initial clinical-functional state, and findings from neuroimaging and neurophysiology to guide to their most suitable mechanism for ideal targeting. Further, we suggest new localization schemes, and bypass strategies that indirectly target peri-lesional circuitry, and methods that serve to counter technical and theoretical challenge in identifying and stimulating such targets at the periphery of infarcts in humans. Last, we describe how stimulation may modulate mechanisms differentially across varying phases of recovery- a temporal effect that may explain missed advantage in clinical trials and help plan for the next stage. With information presented here, future trials would effectively be able to target patient's specific mechanism(s) with invasive (or noninvasive) neurostimulation for the greatest, most consistent benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24353109      PMCID: PMC4121447          DOI: 10.1007/s13311-013-0245-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurotherapeutics        ISSN: 1878-7479            Impact factor:   7.620


  88 in total

1.  Comparison of visual field training for hemianopia with active versus sham transcranial direct cortical stimulation.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; Souzana N Obretenova; Felipe Fregni; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Lotfi B Merabet
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  Striatal stimulation nurtures endogenous neurogenesis and angiogenesis in chronic-phase ischemic stroke rats.

Authors:  Takamasa Morimoto; Takao Yasuhara; Masahiro Kameda; Tanefumi Baba; Satoshi Kuramoto; Akihiko Kondo; Kazuya Takahashi; Naoki Tajiri; Feifei Wang; Jing Meng; Yuan Wen Ji; Tomohito Kadota; Tomoko Maruo; Kazushi Kinugasa; Yasuyuki Miyoshi; Tetsuro Shingo; Cesario V Borlongan; Isao Date
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Electrical stimulation of spared corticospinal axons augments connections with ipsilateral spinal motor circuits after injury.

Authors:  Marcel Brus-Ramer; Jason B Carmel; Samit Chakrabarty; John H Martin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Relationships between essential cortical language sites and subcortical pathways.

Authors:  Timothy M Ellmore; Michael S Beauchamp; Thomas J O'Neill; Stephen Dreyer; Nitin Tandon
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity.

Authors:  Cathy M Stinear; P Alan Barber; Peter R Smale; James P Coxon; Melanie K Fleming; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke.

Authors:  S C Cramer; G Nelles; R R Benson; J D Kaplan; R A Parker; K K Kwong; D N Kennedy; S P Finklestein; B R Rosen
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Extensive cortical rewiring after brain injury.

Authors:  Numa Dancause; Scott Barbay; Shawn B Frost; Erik J Plautz; Daofen Chen; Elena V Zoubina; Ann M Stowe; Randolph J Nudo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in mild to severe hemiparesis early after stroke: a proof of principle and novel approach to improve motor function.

Authors:  Adriana B Conforto; Sarah M Anjos; Gustavo Saposnik; Eduardo A Mello; Erina M Nagaya; Waldyr Santos; Karina N Ferreiro; Eduardo S Melo; Felipe I Reis; Milberto Scaff; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 9.  Controversy: Noninvasive and invasive cortical stimulation show efficacy in treating stroke patients.

Authors:  Friedhelm C Hummel; Pablo Celnik; Alvero Pascual-Leone; Felipe Fregni; Winston D Byblow; Cathrin M Buetefisch; John Rothwell; Leonardo G Cohen; Christian Gerloff
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  Cortical stimulation for the rehabilitation of patients with hemiparetic stroke: a multicenter feasibility study of safety and efficacy.

Authors:  Robert Levy; Sean Ruland; Martin Weinand; David Lowry; Rima Dafer; Roy Bakay
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  17 in total

1.  It takes two: noninvasive brain stimulation combined with neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Stephen J Page; David A Cunningham; Ela Plow; Brittani Blazak
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Stimulation targeting higher motor areas in stroke rehabilitation: A proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled study of effectiveness and underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  David A Cunningham; Nicole Varnerin; Andre Machado; Corin Bonnett; Daniel Janini; Sarah Roelle; Kelsey Potter-Baker; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Xiaofeng Wang; Guang Yue; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  Nonpharmacological therapies for neurologic devices.

Authors:  Andres M Lozano; Brian Harris Kopell
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Rethinking stimulation of the brain in stroke rehabilitation: why higher motor areas might be better alternatives for patients with greater impairments.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; David A Cunningham; Nicole Varnerin; Andre Machado
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 7.519

5.  Responsive Neurostimulation and Cognition.

Authors:  David Spencer
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 7.500

6.  Challenges in Recruitment for the Study of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Stroke: Lessons from Deep Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Kelsey A Potter-Baker; Corin E Bonnett; Patrick Chabra; Sarah Roelle; Nicole Varnerin; David A Cunningham; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Svetlana Pundik; Adriana B Conforto; Andre G Machado; Ela B Plow
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.136

7.  A game of hide and seek: Is it possible to recruit more patients for NIBS studies in stroke?

Authors:  Kelsey A Potter-Baker; Corin E Bonnett; Patrick Chabra; Sarah Roelle; Nicole Varnerin; David A Cunningham; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Svetlana Pundik; Adriana B Conforto; Andre Machado; Ela B Plow
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.181

8.  Sensory-parietal cortical stimulation improves motor recovery in severe capsular infarct.

Authors:  Ra Gyung Kim; Jongwook Cho; Jinkyue Ree; Hyung-Sun Kim; Pedro Rosa-Neto; Jin-Myung Kim; Min-Cheol Lee; Hyoung-Ihl Kim
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 6.200

9.  Cerebellar Neuromodulation for Stroke.

Authors:  Jessica Cooperrider; Arbaz Momin; Kenneth B Baker; Andre G Machado
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2020-02-20

Review 10.  Neurostimulation for Stroke Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Windsor Kwan-Chun Ting; Faïza Abdou-Rahaman Fadul; Shirley Fecteau; Christian Ethier
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.