Literature DB >> 27150315

Frequency and phase effects on cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs) to air-conducted sound.

Sendhil Govender1, Danielle L Dennis1, James G Colebatch2,3.   

Abstract

Few previous studies of tuning using air-conducted (AC) stimuli and the cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) have compensated for the effects of middle ear (ME) attenuation. Zhang et al. (Exp Brain Res 213:111-116, 2011a) who did allow for ME effects were able to show a secondary peak around 100 Hz for the ocular VEMP (oVEMP). Recently, it has become clear that the otolith afferents responsible for the cVEMP and oVEMP differ and thus the nature of tuning may be more related to the reflex studied determining which otolith receptors are activated rather than the properties of the stimulus. We wished to reinvestigate the tuning for the cVEMP using AC stimuli, to establish whether the low-frequency peak is specific for the oVEMP or a consequence of the stimulus modality itself. In response to recent evidence using a 500 Hz AC stimulus that there was no effect of stimulus phase, we also investigated whether phase (condensation or rarefaction) had an effect at any frequency. We measured corrected cVEMP amplitudes and latencies in response to stimuli between 50 and 1200 Hz in 10 normal volunteers using an AC stimulus adjusted for ME attenuation. We confirmed earlier reports of the similarity of the tuning for both the cVEMP and oVEMP reflexes but found no separate 100 Hz peak for the cVEMP. AC stimulus phase did not affect either amplitude or latency. Both the tuning pattern and the phase effects contrast with those previously reported for bone-conducted (BC) stimuli. Unlike BC stimulation, which shows tuning consistent with an action on the otolith membrane, AC stimuli are likely to act through a different mechanism, most likely directly at the hair cell level.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Frequency; Otolith; Phase; Tuning; cVEMP; oVEMP

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27150315     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4661-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  31 in total

1.  Sacculo-ocular reflex connectivity in cats.

Authors:  N Isu; W Graf; H Sato; K Kushiro; M Zakir; M Imagawa; Y Uchino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials are sensitive to stimulus phase.

Authors:  Ken Y Cai; Sally M Rosengren; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-12-11       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  A utricular origin of frequency tuning to low-frequency vibration in the human vestibular system?

Authors:  Neil P M Todd; Sally M Rosengren; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Two distinct patterns of VEMP changes with age.

Authors:  J G Colebatch; S Govender; S M Rosengren
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Frequency-tuning characteristics of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials induced by air-conducted tone bursts.

Authors:  Hong Ju Park; In-Sik Lee; Jung Eun Shin; Yeo Jin Lee; Mun Su Park
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Superior canal dehiscence causes abnormal vestibular bone-conducted tuning.

Authors:  A S Zhang; S Govender; J G Colebatch
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 7.  How does high-frequency sound or vibration activate vestibular receptors?

Authors:  I S Curthoys; J W Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (OVEMPs) produced by air- and bone-conducted sound.

Authors:  Neil P McAngus Todd; Sally M Rosengren; Swee T Aw; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) evoked by air- and bone-conducted stimuli in vestibular neuritis.

Authors:  Sendhil Govender; Danielle L Dennis; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Acoustically responsive fibers in the vestibular nerve of the cat.

Authors:  M P McCue; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  4 in total

1.  Vestibular Evoked Myographic Correlation.

Authors:  Bernd Lütkenhöner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-11-12

2.  Linearity and repeatability of postural responses in relation to peak force and impulse of manually delivered perturbations: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Zeevi Dvir; Maria Paterna; Martina Quargnenti; Carlo De Benedictis; Daniela Maffiodo; Walter Franco; Carlo Ferraresi; Andrea Manca; Franca Deriu; Silvestro Roatta
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Current diagnostic procedures for diagnosing vertigo and dizziness.

Authors:  Leif Erik Walther
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

4.  Effect of Stimulus Frequency on Air-Conducted Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials.

Authors:  Wei Fu; Junliang Han; Feng He; Yuanyuan Wang; Dong Wei; Ying Shi; Ya Bai; Xiaoming Wang
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 1.017

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.