Literature DB >> 28534730

Big Stimulus, Little Ears: Safety in Administering Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Children.

Megan L A Thomas1, Denis Fitzpatrick2, Ryan McCreery1, Kristen L Janky1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) have become common clinical vestibular assessments. However, VEMP testing requires high intensity stimuli, raising concerns regarding safety with children, where sound pressure levels may be higher due to their smaller ear canal volumes.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the range of peak-to-peak equivalent sound pressure levels (peSPLs) in child and adult ears in response to high intensity stimuli (i.e., 100 dB normal hearing level [nHL]) commonly used for VEMP testing and make a determination of whether acoustic stimuli levels with VEMP testing are safe for use in children. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Prospective experimental. STUDY SAMPLE: Ten children (4-6 years) and ten young adults (24-35 years) with normal hearing sensitivity and middle ear function participated in the study. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Probe microphone peSPL measurements of clicks and 500 Hz tonebursts (TBs) were recorded in tubes of small, medium, and large diameter, and in a Brüel & Kjær Ear Simulator Type 4157 to assess for linearity of the stimulus at high levels. The different diameter tubes were used to approximate the range of cross-sectional areas in infant, child, and adult ears, respectively. Equivalent ear canal volume and peSPL measurements were then recorded in child and adult ears. Lower intensity levels were used in the participant's ears to limit exposure to high intensity sound. The peSPL measurements in participant ears were extrapolated using predictions from linear mixed models to determine if equivalent ear canal volume significantly contributed to overall peSPL and to estimate the mean and 95% confidence intervals of peSPLs in child and adult ears when high intensity stimulus levels (100 dB nHL) are used for VEMP testing without exposing subjects to high-intensity stimuli.
RESULTS: Measurements from the coupler and tubes suggested: 1) each stimuli was linear, 2) there were no distortions or nonlinearities at high levels, and 3) peSPL increased with decreased tube diameter. Measurements in participant ears suggested: 1) peSPL was approximately 3 dB larger in child compared to adult ears, and 2) peSPL was larger in response to clicks compared to 500 Hz TBs. The model predicted the following 95% confidence interval for a 100 dB nHL click: 127-136.5 dB peSPL in adult ears and 128.7-138.2 dB peSPL in child ears. The model predicted the following 95% confidence interval for a 100 dB nHL 500 Hz TB stimulus: 122.2-128.2 dB peSPL in adult ears and 124.8-130.8 dB peSPL in child ears.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that 1) when completing VEMP testing, the stimulus is approximately 3 dB higher in a child's ear, 2) a 500 Hz TB is recommended over a click as it has lower peSPL compared to the click, and 3) both duration and intensity should be considered when choosing VEMP stimuli. Calculating the total sound energy exposure for your chosen stimuli is recommended as it accounts for both duration and intensity. When using this calculation for children, consider adding 3 dB to the stimulus level. American Academy of Audiology

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28534730      PMCID: PMC5443117          DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.15097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  27 in total

1.  Vestibular function in deafness and severe hardness of hearing.

Authors:  J ARNVIG
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1955 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.494

2.  The ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (OVEMP), ten years old.

Authors:  Neil Todd
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Frequency-tuning characteristics of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials induced by air-conducted tone bursts.

Authors:  Hong Ju Park; In-Sik Lee; Jung Eun Shin; Yeo Jin Lee; Mun Su Park
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  The effect of rise/fall time of 500 Hz short tone bursts on cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential.

Authors:  Niraj Kumar Singh; Kumari Apeksha
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Safe levels of acoustic stimulation: comment on '"effects of acoustic stimuli used for vestibular evoked myogenic potential studies on the cochlear function '".

Authors:  James G Colebatch; Sally M Rosengren
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Influence of labyrinthine hypoactivity on gross motor development of infants.

Authors:  K Kaga; J I Suzuki; R R Marsh; Y Tanaka
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Rapid cVEMP and oVEMP responses elicited by a novel head striker and recording device.

Authors:  P Ashley Wackym; Jennifer A Ratigan; Jonathan D Birck; Steven H Johnson; Josef Doornink; Michael Bottlang; Stuart K Gardiner; F Owen Black
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  The effect of saccular function on static balance ability of profound hearing-impaired children.

Authors:  Zahra Jafari; Saeed Asad Malayeri
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 1.675

9.  Probe-tube microphone measures of ear-canal sound pressure levels in infants and children.

Authors:  J A Feigin; J G Kopun; P G Stelmachowicz; M P Gorga
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Effect of vestibular dysfunction on the development of gross motor function in children with profound hearing loss.

Authors:  Aki Inoue; Shinichi Iwasaki; Munetaka Ushio; Yasuhiro Chihara; Chisato Fujimoto; Naoya Egami; Tatsuya Yamasoba
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 1.854

View more
  7 in total

1.  Effects of High Sound Exposure During Air-Conducted Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing in Children and Young Adults.

Authors:  Amanda I Rodriguez; Megan L A Thomas; Denis Fitzpatrick; Kristen L Janky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Air-Conducted Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: Thresholds, Frequency Tuning, and Effects of Sound Exposure.

Authors:  Amanda I Rodriguez; Megan L A Thomas; Kristen L Janky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 3.  Quantitative Vestibular Function Testing in the Pediatric Population.

Authors:  Kristen L Janky; Amanda I Rodriguez
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-07-20

Review 4.  Vestibular and Oculomotor Function in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Anwar Almutairi; Jennifer Braswell Christy; Laura Vogtle
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-07-20

5.  Age Effects of Bone Conduction Vibration Vestibular-evoked Myogenic Potentials (VEMPs) Using B81 and Impulse Hammer Stimuli.

Authors:  Jessie N Patterson; Amanda I Rodriguez; Katherine R Gordon; Julie A Honaker; Kristen L Janky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

6.  Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (VEMP) Test-retest Reliability in Children.

Authors:  Elizabeth Fuemmeler; Amanda I Rodriguez; Megan Thomas; Tom Creutz; Denis Fitzpatrick; Kristen L Janky
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.619

7.  Effects of aging on ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential using ER-3A insert earphone and B81 bone vibrator.

Authors:  Zhuo Xu; Zhilin Wang; Bo Zhong; Minjiao Wang; Xiaoqin Fan; Cuncun Ren; Meihao Qi; Ying Lin; Dingjun Zha
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.086

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.