Literature DB >> 19889063

alpha-Blockers to assist stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a meta-analysis.

Yefang Zhu1, Diederick Duijvesz, Maroeska M Rovers, Tycho M Lock.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence for the use of alpha-blockers after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in enhancing the effectiveness of renal and ureteric stone clearance.
METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library up to January 2009. All randomized controlled trials in which alpha-blockers were evaluated after ESWL were eligible for the analysis. Outcome measures assessed were clearance rate (primary) and expulsion time (secondary). Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. All data were analysed using RevMan 5.
RESULTS: Of the 29 identified papers, seven trials with a total of 484 patients met the predefined criteria. These studies evaluated the effectiveness of the alpha-blocker tamsulosin, and studied clearance rate as the primary outcome. There was large heterogeneity between trials, but their methodological quality was adequate. The pooled absolute risk difference of clearance rate was 16% (95% confidence interval 5-27%) in favour of the tamsulosin group, i.e. an average of six patients have to be treated with tamsulosin after ESWL to achieve clearance in one. Subgroup analysis for the six studies that used a dose of 0.4 mg tamsulosin showed a pooled risk difference of 19 (10-29)%. The expulsion time was analysed in three studies and the pooled mean difference was 8 (-3-20) days in favour of the tamsulosin group. Pain and analgesic usage was reported to be lower with tamsulosin. Adverse effects of tamsulosin, mainly dizziness, were reported in eight patients (3%).
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with tamsulosin after ESWL appears to be effective in assisting stone clearance in patients with renal and ureteric calculi. To make a definite clinical recommendation to use tamsulosin after ESWL for renal and ureteric calculi, a high quality confirmatory trial is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19889063     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09014.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  23 in total

Review 1.  Aspects on how extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy should be carried out in order to be maximally effective.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Christian G Chaussy
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-06-27

2.  Tamsulosin and doxazosin as adjunctive therapy following shock-wave lithotripsy of renal calculi: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Osama M Zaytoun; Rachid Yakoubi; Abdel Rahman M Zahran; Khaled Fouda; Essam Marzouk; Salah Gaafar; Khaled Fareed
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-08-12

3.  CUA Guideline: Management of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Michael Ordon; Sero Andonian; Brian Blew; Trevor Schuler; Ben Chew; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Comparison of treatment outcomes according to output voltage during shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: a prospective randomized multicenter study.

Authors:  Jinsung Park; Hong-Wook Kim; Sungwoo Hong; Hee Jo Yang; Hong Chung
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Medical Expulsive Therapy: Worthwhile or Wishful Thinking.

Authors:  Tad Kroczak; Kenneth T Pace; Jason Y Lee
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  [Individualized evidence-based interventional stone treatment : One stone, many question marks?]

Authors:  T Bach; T Knoll
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Does the use of doxazosin influence the success of SWL in the treatment of upper ureteral stones? A multicenter, prospective and randomized study.

Authors:  Ferhat Ateş; Bilal Eryıldırım; Metin Ishak Öztürk; Turgay Turan; Cenk Gürbüz; Mete Oğuz Ekinci; Asıf Yıldırım; Cemal Göktaş; Temuçin Şenkul; Kemal Sarıca
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-01-07

8.  Shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for ureteral calculi: a prospective assessment of patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Jinsung Park; Dong Wook Shin; Jae Hoon Chung; Seung Wook Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Shock-wave lithotripsy: variance within UK practice.

Authors:  N L Sharma; C E Alexander; E Grout; B W Turney
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Alpha-blockers after shock wave lithotripsy for renal or ureteral stones in adults.

Authors:  Makinna C Oestreich; Robin Wm Vernooij; Niranjan J Sathianathen; Eu Chang Hwang; Gretchen M Kuntz; Alex Koziarz; Charles D Scales; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-11-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.