Literature DB >> 19888401

Quality control of self-monitoring of blood glucose: why and how?

Bogdan Solnica1, Jerzy W Naskalski.   

Abstract

The control of analytical quality of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is recommended as a routine procedure in diabetes management. This control procedure should be easily accessible to patients, convenient, not time-consuming, and provide a reliable assessment of glucose meter performance. Optimally it should be located in the diabetes outpatient clinic. Presently there are two approaches to carrying out SMBG quality control. The first is based on the comparison of results obtained by a controlled glucose meter and use of the laboratory method or point-of-care testing device as a surrogate reference analyzer. The second one is a traditionally organized external quality assessment scheme with use of a dedicated control material, which is distributed to all participants. The recommended allowable meter error in SMBG can be realistically set at 10%.

Entities:  

Keywords:  analytical quality; diabetes mellitus; glucose meter; glycemia; imprecision

Year:  2007        PMID: 19888401      PMCID: PMC2771478          DOI: 10.1177/193229680700100204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  22 in total

1.  [Evaluation of the quality of blood glucose meters using the HemoCue B glucose system].

Authors:  G Lefèvre; S Girardot-Dubois; G Chevallier; C Cohen; R Couderc; J Etienne
Journal:  Diabetes Metab       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 6.041

2.  Accuracy of the EasyTouch blood glucose self-monitoring system: a study of 516 cases.

Authors:  Ken-Shwo Dai; Der-Yan Tai; Ping Ho; Chien-Chih Chen; Wen-Chung Peng; Shih-Te Chen; Chun-Chieh Hsu; Yu-Ping Liu; Hsiu-Ching Hsieh; Chin-Chang Yang; Ming-Chuan Tsai; Simon J T Mao
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.786

3.  Quality control of SMBG in clinical practice.

Authors:  Bogdan Solnica; Jerzy W Naskalski
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl       Date:  2005

4.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2006.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Problems with the external quality assessment of accuracy of point of care devices (POCD) for blood glucose are independent of sample composition.

Authors:  William Graham Wood
Journal:  Clin Lab       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.138

7.  Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  W L Clarke; D Cox; L A Gonder-Frederick; W Carter; S L Pohl
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Consensus statement on self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose. American Diabetes Association.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Evaluation of Roche Accu-Chek Go and Medisense Optium blood glucose meters.

Authors:  Robert C Hawkins
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.786

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of the analytical performance of the coulometry-based Optium Omega blood glucose meter.

Authors:  Bogdan Solnica; Beata Kusnierz-Cabala; Krystyna Slowinska-Solnica; Przemyslaw Witek; Agnieszka Cempa; Maciej T Malecki
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-11-01

2.  Patient-based quality control for glucometers: using the moving sum of positive patient results and moving average.

Authors:  Chun Yee Lim; Tony Badrick; Tze Ping Loh
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.