Literature DB >> 15469866

Accuracy of the EasyTouch blood glucose self-monitoring system: a study of 516 cases.

Ken-Shwo Dai1, Der-Yan Tai, Ping Ho, Chien-Chih Chen, Wen-Chung Peng, Shih-Te Chen, Chun-Chieh Hsu, Yu-Ping Liu, Hsiu-Ching Hsieh, Chin-Chang Yang, Ming-Chuan Tsai, Simon J T Mao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-monitoring blood glucose device is an important tool for diabetes patients to efficiently control their blood glucose concentrations. We evaluated the accuracy of EasyTouch glucose monitoring system.
METHODS: Capillary blood glucose concentrations measured using EasyTouch and the reference values obtained from Yellow Springs Instruments (YSI) 2300 STAT were performed in the Department of Laboratory Medicine, Wei-Gong Memorial Hospital. Results were evaluated using (1) linear regression analysis, (2) Clarke Error Grid analysis, (3) percentage of readings within a defined range of deviation from the reference value, (4) bias plots, and (5) coefficients of variation (CVs) calculated from 60 measurements in series.
RESULTS: The window of the 516 EasyTouch readings covered a range from 42 to 555 mg/dl. Linear regression analysis yielded a regression slope 0.9972, intercept 1.899 mg/dl, r2 0.9571, and Syx 14.89 mg/dl. A Clarke Error Grid analysis showed 100% of the EasyTouch readings in clinically acceptable zones A and B. Of the EasyTouch readings, 98.3%, 91.9%, 78.3% and 46.9% were found within +/-20%, +/-15%, +/-10%, and +/-5%, respectively, of the reference values. Further analysis showed that the percentage of EasyTouch readings within the defined intervals was similar in three glucose ranges (< or =100, 101-200, and > or =201 mg/dl). The CVs for the four lots of strips (lot 1 to lot 4) ranged from 3.5 to 5.5%, 2.1 to 4.8%, 1.8 to 3.6%, and 3.0 to 5.7%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: EasyTouch provides high accurate and precise glucose readings over a wide range of glucose concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15469866     DOI: 10.1016/j.cccn.2004.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chim Acta        ISSN: 0009-8981            Impact factor:   3.786


  9 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy of point-of-care glucose measurements.

Authors:  Annette Rebel; Mark A Rice; Brenda G Fahy
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

2.  Comparison of Commercial and Self-Initiated Weight Loss Programs in People With Prediabetes: A Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  David G Marrero; Kelly N B Palmer; Erin O Phillips; Karen Miller-Kovach; Gary D Foster; Chandan K Saha
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Evaluation of the analytical performance of the coulometry-based Optium Omega blood glucose meter.

Authors:  Bogdan Solnica; Beata Kusnierz-Cabala; Krystyna Slowinska-Solnica; Przemyslaw Witek; Agnieszka Cempa; Maciej T Malecki
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-11-01

4.  Quality control of self-monitoring of blood glucose: why and how?

Authors:  Bogdan Solnica; Jerzy W Naskalski
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-03

Review 5.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.

Authors:  Richard L Wahl; Heather Jacene; Yvette Kasamon; Martin A Lodge
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard; Mike J O'Doherty; Wolfgang A Weber; Felix M Mottaghy; Markus N Lonsdale; Sigrid G Stroobants; Wim J G Oyen; Joerg Kotzerke; Otto S Hoekstra; Jan Pruim; Paul K Marsden; Klaus Tatsch; Corneline J Hoekstra; Eric P Visser; Bertjan Arends; Fred J Verzijlbergen; Josee M Zijlstra; Emile F I Comans; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Anne M Paans; Antoon T Willemsen; Thomas Beyer; Andreas Bockisch; Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop; Dominique Delbeke; Richard P Baum; Arturo Chiti; Bernd J Krause
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Measuring response to therapy using FDG PET: semi-quantitative and full kinetic analysis.

Authors:  Patsuree Cheebsumon; Linda M Velasquez; Corneline J Hoekstra; Wendy Hayes; Reina W Kloet; Nikie J Hoetjes; Egbert F Smit; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard; Roberto Delgado-Bolton; Wim J G Oyen; Francesco Giammarile; Klaus Tatsch; Wolfgang Eschner; Fred J Verzijlbergen; Sally F Barrington; Lucy C Pike; Wolfgang A Weber; Sigrid Stroobants; Dominique Delbeke; Kevin J Donohoe; Scott Holbrook; Michael M Graham; Giorgio Testanera; Otto S Hoekstra; Josee Zijlstra; Eric Visser; Corneline J Hoekstra; Jan Pruim; Antoon Willemsen; Bertjan Arends; Jörg Kotzerke; Andreas Bockisch; Thomas Beyer; Arturo Chiti; Bernd J Krause
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Pre-/analytical factors affecting whole blood and plasma glucose concentrations in loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta).

Authors:  Patricia E Kunze; Justin R Perrault; Yu-Mei Chang; Charles A Manire; Samantha Clark; Nicole I Stacy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.