Literature DB >> 16112963

Quality control of SMBG in clinical practice.

Bogdan Solnica1, Jerzy W Naskalski.   

Abstract

We present results of quality control of self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) performed in diabetes outpatient clinic. The tests included: inspection of glucose meter, blood glucose self-measurement by a patient, glucose measurement by point-of-care analyzer used in a clinic and with the laboratory method. In the study 158 glucose meters were controlled and compared with HemoCue glucose analyzer used in the clinic as the reference. 122 glucose meters readings were also compared with the reference laboratory method. Tested glucose meters included: Accutrend {18}, Glucotrend {59}, Precision QiD {39}, One Touch {26} and Glucocard II {16}. Reference glucose assays were performed using glucose oxidase method on Hitachi 911 analyzer. Glucose concentrations measured by the controlled glucose meters ranged from 36 to 425 mg/dL. The analytical bias of the glucose meters amounted from 2.48% to 8.27%. Correlation coefficient between results obtained by the tested glucose meters and HemoCue analyzer ranged from 0.957 to 0.980 and between glucose meters and laboratory method from 0.955 to 0.985. Passing-Bablok agreement test and Deming regression analysis indicated good concordance of results between all the tested glucose meters and HemoCue analyzer, whereas good agreement with the laboratory method was found for Accutrend, Glucotrend, Precision QiD and One Touch glucose meters. In conclusion, good analytical performance of the employed glucose meters and a bias less than 10% from the reference values were found. Results of this study show the possibility for routine, convenient for the patient quality control of SMBG in an outpatient clinic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16112963     DOI: 10.1080/00365510500235996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl        ISSN: 0085-591X


  7 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy of point-of-care glucose measurements.

Authors:  Annette Rebel; Mark A Rice; Brenda G Fahy
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

2.  Approaches for improving glucose monitor measurements for self-monitoring of blood glucose: from measurement harmonization to external quality assessment programs.

Authors:  Hubert W Vesper; Gary L Myers
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-03

Review 3.  Glucose meters: a review of technical challenges to obtaining accurate results.

Authors:  Ksenia Tonyushkina; James H Nichols
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

4.  Evaluation of the analytical performance of the coulometry-based Optium Omega blood glucose meter.

Authors:  Bogdan Solnica; Beata Kusnierz-Cabala; Krystyna Slowinska-Solnica; Przemyslaw Witek; Agnieszka Cempa; Maciej T Malecki
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-11-01

5.  Quality control of self-monitoring of blood glucose: why and how?

Authors:  Bogdan Solnica; Jerzy W Naskalski
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-03

6.  Maternal high-fat diet impacts endothelial function in nonhuman primate offspring.

Authors:  L Fan; S R Lindsley; S M Comstock; D L Takahashi; A E Evans; G-W He; K L Thornburg; K L Grove
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 7.  Patterns of glycemia in normal pregnancy: should the current therapeutic targets be challenged?

Authors:  Teri L Hernandez; Jacob E Friedman; Rachael E Van Pelt; Linda A Barbour
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 19.112

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.