Literature DB >> 19887472

Genome size reduction can trigger rapid phenotypic evolution in invasive plants.

Sébastien Lavergne1, Nikolas J Muenke, Jane Molofsky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The study of rapid evolution in invasive species has highlighted the fundamental role played by founder events, emergence of genetic novelties through recombination and rapid response to new selective pressures. However, whether rapid adaptation of introduced species can be driven by punctual changes in genome organization has received little attention. In plants, variation in genome size, i.e. variation in the amount of DNA per monoploid set of chromosomes through loss or gain of repeated DNA sequences, is known to influence a number of physiological, phenological and life-history features. The present study investigated whether change in genome size has contributed to the evolution of greater potential of vegetative growth in invasive populations of an introduced grass.
METHODS: The study was based on the recent demonstration that invasive genotypes of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) occurring in North America have emerged from recombination between introduced European strains. The genome sizes of more than 200 invasive and native genotypes were measured and their genome size was related to their phenotypic traits measured in a common glasshouse environment. Population genetics data were used to infer phylogeographical relationships between study populations, and the evolutionary history of genome size within the study species was inferred. KEY
RESULTS: Invasive genotypes had a smaller genome than European native genotypes from which they are derived. This smaller genome size had phenotypic effects that increased the species' invasive potential, including a higher early growth rate, due to a negative relationship between genome size and rate of stem elongation. Based on inferred phylogeographical relationships of invasive and native populations, evolutionary models were consistent with a scenario of genome reduction by natural selection during the invasion process, rather than a scenario of stochastic change.
CONCLUSIONS: Punctual reduction in genome size could cause rapid changes in key phenotypic traits that enhance invasive ability. Although the generality of genome size variation leading to phenotypic evolution and the specific genomic mechanisms involved are not known, change in genome size may constitute an important but previously under-appreciated mechanism of rapid evolutionary change that may promote evolutionary novelties over short time scales.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19887472      PMCID: PMC2794072          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcp271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  30 in total

Review 1.  The modulation of DNA content: proximate causes and ultimate consequences.

Authors:  T R Gregory; P D Hebert
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 2.  Why so many noncoding nucleotides? The eukaryote genome as an epigenetic machine.

Authors:  Emile Zuckerkandl
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Mechanisms of recent genome size variation in flowering plants.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Bennetzen; Jianxin Ma; Katrien M Devos
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  A general eco-evolutionary framework for understanding bioinvasions.

Authors:  Benoit Facon; Benjamin J Genton; Jacqui Shykoff; Philippe Jarne; Arnaud Estoup; Patrice David
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Correlated evolution of genome size and seed mass.

Authors:  Jeremy M Beaulieu; Angela T Moles; Ilia J Leitch; Michael D Bennett; John B Dickie; Charles A Knight
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass.

Authors:  Sébastien Lavergne; Jane Molofsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Ecological and evolutionary insights from species invasions.

Authors:  Dov F Sax; John J Stachowicz; James H Brown; John F Bruno; Michael N Dawson; Steven D Gaines; Richard K Grosberg; Alan Hastings; Robert D Holt; Margaret M Mayfield; Mary I O'Connor; William R Rice
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  The mode and tempo of genome size evolution in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Matthew J Oliver; Dmitri Petrov; David Ackerly; Paul Falkowski; Oscar M Schofield
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-04-09       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Genome size reduction through illegitimate recombination counteracts genome expansion in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Katrien M Devos; James K M Brown; Jeffrey L Bennetzen
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Successful biological invasion despite a severe genetic load.

Authors:  Amro Zayed; Serban A Constantin; Laurence Packer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions.

Authors:  Mariska te Beest; Johannes J Le Roux; David M Richardson; Anne K Brysting; Jan Suda; Magdalena Kubesová; Petr Pysek
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Ecological effects of cell-level processes: genome size, functional traits and regional abundance of herbaceous plant species.

Authors:  Tomás Herben; Jan Suda; Jitka Klimesová; Stanislav Mihulka; Pavel Ríha; Irena Símová
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  A reassessment of the genome size-invasiveness relationship in reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea).

Authors:  Megan A Martinez; Eric J Baack; Stephen M Hovick; Kenneth D Whitney
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Invasion strategies in clonal aquatic plants: are phenotypic differences caused by phenotypic plasticity or local adaptation?

Authors:  Tenna Riis; Carla Lambertini; Birgit Olesen; John S Clayton; Hans Brix; Brian K Sorrell
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Role of adaptive and non-adaptive mechanisms forming complex patterns of genome size variation in six cytotypes of polyploid Allium oleraceum (Amaryllidaceae) on a continental scale.

Authors:  Martin Duchoslav; Lenka Šafářová; Michaela Jandová
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Polyploidy and high environmental tolerance increase the invasive success of plants.

Authors:  Renan Fernandes Moura; Drielly Queiroga; Egon Vilela; Ana Paula Moraes
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.629

7.  The evolution of intron size in amniotes: a role for powered flight?

Authors:  Qu Zhang; Scott V Edwards
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.416

8.  Reconstructing the origins of high-alpine niches and cushion life form in the genus Androsace S.L. (Primulaceae).

Authors:  Florian C Boucher; Wilfried Thuiller; Cristina Roquet; Rolland Douzet; Serge Aubert; Nadir Alvarez; Sébastien Lavergne
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Genome size evolution is associated with climate seasonality and glucosinolates, but not life history, soil nutrients or range size, across a clade of mustards.

Authors:  N Ivalú Cacho; Patrick J McIntyre; Daniel J Kliebenstein; Sharon Y Strauss
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Self-selection of evolutionary strategies: adaptive versus non-adaptive forces.

Authors:  Matthew Putnins; Ioannis P Androulakis
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.