BACKGROUND: Biological invasions are a major ecological and socio-economic problem in many parts of the world. Despite an explosion of research in recent decades, much remains to be understood about why some species become invasive whereas others do not. Recently, polyploidy (whole genome duplication) has been proposed as an important determinant of invasiveness in plants. Genome duplication has played a major role in plant evolution and can drastically alter a plant's genetic make-up, morphology, physiology and ecology within only one or a few generations. This may allow some polyploids to succeed in strongly fluctuating environments and/or effectively colonize new habitats and, thus, increase their potential to be invasive. SCOPE: We synthesize current knowledge on the importance of polyploidy for the invasion (i.e. spread) of introduced plants. We first aim to elucidate general mechanisms that are involved in the success of polyploid plants and translate this to that of plant invaders. Secondly, we provide an overview of ploidal levels in selected invasive alien plants and explain how ploidy might have contributed to their success. CONCLUSIONS: Polyploidy can be an important factor in species invasion success through a combination of (1) 'pre-adaptation', whereby polyploid lineages are predisposed to conditions in the new range and, therefore, have higher survival rates and fitness in the earliest establishment phase; and (2) the possibility for subsequent adaptation due to a larger genetic diversity that may assist the 'evolution of invasiveness'. Alternatively, polyploidization may play an important role by (3) restoring sexual reproduction following hybridization or, conversely, (4) asexual reproduction in the absence of suitable mates. We, therefore, encourage invasion biologists to incorporate assessments of ploidy in their studies of invasive alien species.
BACKGROUND: Biological invasions are a major ecological and socio-economic problem in many parts of the world. Despite an explosion of research in recent decades, much remains to be understood about why some species become invasive whereas others do not. Recently, polyploidy (whole genome duplication) has been proposed as an important determinant of invasiveness in plants. Genome duplication has played a major role in plant evolution and can drastically alter a plant's genetic make-up, morphology, physiology and ecology within only one or a few generations. This may allow some polyploids to succeed in strongly fluctuating environments and/or effectively colonize new habitats and, thus, increase their potential to be invasive. SCOPE: We synthesize current knowledge on the importance of polyploidy for the invasion (i.e. spread) of introduced plants. We first aim to elucidate general mechanisms that are involved in the success of polyploid plants and translate this to that of plant invaders. Secondly, we provide an overview of ploidal levels in selected invasive alien plants and explain how ploidy might have contributed to their success. CONCLUSIONS:Polyploidy can be an important factor in species invasion success through a combination of (1) 'pre-adaptation', whereby polyploid lineages are predisposed to conditions in the new range and, therefore, have higher survival rates and fitness in the earliest establishment phase; and (2) the possibility for subsequent adaptation due to a larger genetic diversity that may assist the 'evolution of invasiveness'. Alternatively, polyploidization may play an important role by (3) restoring sexual reproduction following hybridization or, conversely, (4) asexual reproduction in the absence of suitable mates. We, therefore, encourage invasion biologists to incorporate assessments of ploidy in their studies of invasive alien species.
Authors: Jianlin Wang; Lu Tian; Hyeon-Se Lee; Ning E Wei; Hongmei Jiang; Brian Watson; Andreas Madlung; Thomas C Osborn; R W Doerge; Luca Comai; Z Jeffrey Chen Journal: Genetics Date: 2005-09-19 Impact factor: 4.562
Authors: Zhen Li; Jonas Defoort; Setareh Tasdighian; Steven Maere; Yves Van de Peer; Riet De Smet Journal: Plant Cell Date: 2016-01-07 Impact factor: 11.277
Authors: Michaela Sonnleitner; Karl Hülber; Ruth Flatscher; Pedro Escobar García; Manuela Winkler; Jan Suda; Peter Schönswetter; Gerald M Schneeweiss Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2015-12-11 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Don A Driscoll; Jane A Catford; Jacob N Barney; Philip E Hulme; Tara G Martin; Aníbal Pauchard; Petr Pyšek; David M Richardson; Sophie Riley; Vernon Visser Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-11-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Liming Cai; Zhenxiang Xi; André M Amorim; M Sugumaran; Joshua S Rest; Liang Liu; Charles C Davis Journal: New Phytol Date: 2018-07-21 Impact factor: 10.151