Literature DB >> 22628380

Ecological effects of cell-level processes: genome size, functional traits and regional abundance of herbaceous plant species.

Tomás Herben1, Jan Suda, Jitka Klimesová, Stanislav Mihulka, Pavel Ríha, Irena Símová.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Genome size is known to be correlated with a number of phenotypic traits associated with cell sizes and cell-division rates. Genome size was therefore used as a proxy for them in order to assess how common plant traits such as height, specific leaf area and seed size/number predict species regional abundance. In this study it is hypothesized that if there is residual correlation between genome size and abundance after these traits are partialled out, there must be additional ecological effects of cell size and/or cell-division rate.
METHODS: Variation in genome size, plant traits and regional abundance were examined in 436 herbaceous species of central European flora, and relationships were sought for among these variables by correlation and path analysis. KEY
RESULTS: Species regional abundance was weakly but significantly correlated with genome size; the relationship was stronger for annuals (R(2) = 0·145) than for perennials (R(2) = 0·027). In annuals, genome size was linked to abundance via its effect on seed size, which constrains seed number and hence population growth rate. In perennials, it weakly affected (via height and specific leaf area) competitive ability. These relationships did not change qualitatively after phylogenetic correction. In both annuals and perennials there was an unresolved effect of genome size on abundance.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that additional predictors of regional abundance should be sought among variables that are linked to cell size and cell-division rate. Signals of these cell-level processes remain identifiable even at the landscape scale, and show deep differences between perennials and annuals. Plant population biology could thus possibly benefit from more systematic use of indicators of cell-level processes.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22628380      PMCID: PMC3489144          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcs099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  20 in total

1.  Quantifying phylogenetically structured environmental variation.

Authors:  Yves Desdevises; Pierre Legendre; Lamia Azouzi; Serge Morand
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Selfish DNA is maladaptive: evidence from the plant Red List.

Authors:  Alexander E Vinogradov
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 3.  The large genome constraint hypothesis: evolution, ecology and phenotype.

Authors:  Charles A Knight; Nicole A Molinari; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Correlated evolution of genome size and seed mass.

Authors:  Jeremy M Beaulieu; Angela T Moles; Ilia J Leitch; Michael D Bennett; John B Dickie; Charles A Knight
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 10.151

5.  A strong nucleotypic effect on the cell cycle regardless of ploidy level.

Authors:  Dennis Francis; M Stuart Davies; Peter W Barlow
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Genome size reduction can trigger rapid phenotypic evolution in invasive plants.

Authors:  Sébastien Lavergne; Nikolas J Muenke; Jane Molofsky
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  A role for nonadaptive processes in plant genome size evolution?

Authors:  Kenneth D Whitney; Eric J Baack; James L Hamrick; Mary Jo W Godt; Brian C Barringer; Michael D Bennett; Christopher G Eckert; Carol Goodwillie; Susan Kalisz; Ilia J Leitch; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Geometrical constraints in the scaling relationships between genome size, cell size and cell cycle length in herbaceous plants.

Authors:  Irena Símová; Tomás Herben
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification.

Authors:  Douglas E Soltis; Victor A Albert; Jim Leebens-Mack; Charles D Bell; Andrew H Paterson; Chunfang Zheng; David Sankoff; Claude W Depamphilis; P Kerr Wall; Pamela S Soltis
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.844

10.  PATRISTIC: a program for calculating patristic distances and graphically comparing the components of genetic change.

Authors:  Mathieu Fourment; Mark J Gibbs
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  7 in total

1.  Clonal growth and plant species abundance.

Authors:  Tomáš Herben; Zuzana Nováková; Jitka Klimešová
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  The ecology of plant populations: their dynamics, interactions and evolution.

Authors:  John R Pannell
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Residence time, native range size, and genome size predict naturalization among angiosperms introduced to Australia.

Authors:  John P Schmidt; John M Drake; Patrick Stephens
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 4.  Genome Size Diversity and Its Impact on the Evolution of Land Plants.

Authors:  Jaume Pellicer; Oriane Hidalgo; Steven Dodsworth; Ilia J Leitch
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  Genome Size Covaries More Positively with Propagule Size than Adult Size: New Insights into an Old Problem.

Authors:  Douglas S Glazier
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-26

6.  DNA content variation and its significance in the evolution of the genus Micrasterias (Desmidiales, Streptophyta).

Authors:  Aloisie Poulíčková; Aloisie Poulíèková; Petra Mazalová; Radim J Vašut; Petra Šarhanová; Jiří Neustupa; Jiøí Neustupa; Pavel Škaloud
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A less selfish view of genome size evolution in maize.

Authors:  Julia M Kreiner; Stephen I Wright
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 5.917

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.