BACKGROUND: Strict blood glucose control by applying nurse-driven protocols is common nowadays in intensive care units (ICUs). Implementation of a predictive control system can potentially reduce the workload for medical staff but requires a model for accurately predicting the glycemia signal within a certain time horizon. METHODS: GlucoDay (A. Menarini Diagnostics, Italy) data coming from 19 critically ill patients (from a surgical ICU) are used to estimate the initial ICU "minimal" model (based on data of the first 24 hours) and to reestimate the model as new measurements are obtained. The reestimation is performed every hour or every 4 hours. For both approaches the optimal size of the data set for each reestimation is determined. RESULTS: The prediction error that is obtained when applying the 1-hour reestimation strategy is significantly smaller than when the model is reestimated only every 4 hours (p < 0.001). The optimal size of the data set to be considered in each reestimation process of the ICU minimal model is found to be 4 hours. The obtained average "mean percentage error" is 7.6% (SD 3.1%) and 14.6% (SD 7.0%) when the model is reestimated every hour and 4 hours, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the ICU minimal model in the appropriate reestimation process results in clinically acceptable prediction errors. Therefore, the model is able to predict glycemia trends of patients admitted to the surgical ICU and can potentially be used in a predictive control system.
BACKGROUND: Strict blood glucose control by applying nurse-driven protocols is common nowadays in intensive care units (ICUs). Implementation of a predictive control system can potentially reduce the workload for medical staff but requires a model for accurately predicting the glycemia signal within a certain time horizon. METHODS: GlucoDay (A. Menarini Diagnostics, Italy) data coming from 19 critically illpatients (from a surgical ICU) are used to estimate the initial ICU "minimal" model (based on data of the first 24 hours) and to reestimate the model as new measurements are obtained. The reestimation is performed every hour or every 4 hours. For both approaches the optimal size of the data set for each reestimation is determined. RESULTS: The prediction error that is obtained when applying the 1-hour reestimation strategy is significantly smaller than when the model is reestimated only every 4 hours (p < 0.001). The optimal size of the data set to be considered in each reestimation process of the ICU minimal model is found to be 4 hours. The obtained average "mean percentage error" is 7.6% (SD 3.1%) and 14.6% (SD 7.0%) when the model is reestimated every hour and 4 hours, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the ICU minimal model in the appropriate reestimation process results in clinically acceptable prediction errors. Therefore, the model is able to predict glycemia trends of patients admitted to the surgical ICU and can potentially be used in a predictive control system.
Authors: G van den Berghe; P Wouters; F Weekers; C Verwaest; F Bruyninckx; M Schetz; D Vlasselaers; P Ferdinande; P Lauwers; R Bouillon Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-11-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Greet Van den Berghe; Alexander Wilmer; Greet Hermans; Wouter Meersseman; Pieter J Wouters; Ilse Milants; Eric Van Wijngaerden; Herman Bobbaers; Roger Bouillon Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-02-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Greet Van den Berghe; Pieter J Wouters; Roger Bouillon; Frank Weekers; Charles Verwaest; Miet Schetz; Dirk Vlasselaers; Patrick Ferdinande; Peter Lauwers Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Stephen D Patek; E Andy Ortiz; Leon S Farhy; Jennifer Mason Lobo; James Isbell; Jennifer L Kirby; Anthony McCall Journal: Proc Am Control Conf Date: 2015-07-30
Authors: Petr Kopecký; Miloš Mráz; Jan Bláha; Jaroslav Lindner; Stĕpán Svačina; Roman Hovorka; Martin Haluzík Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2013-02-20 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Jan Wernerman; Thomas Desaive; Simon Finfer; Luc Foubert; Anthony Furnary; Ulrike Holzinger; Roman Hovorka; Jeffrey Joseph; Mikhail Kosiborod; James Krinsley; Dieter Mesotten; Stanley Nasraway; Olav Rooyackers; Marcus J Schultz; Tom Van Herpe; Robert A Vigersky; Jean-Charles Preiser Journal: Crit Care Date: 2014-06-13 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: J Geoffrey Chase; Thomas Desaive; Julien Bohe; Miriam Cnop; Christophe De Block; Jan Gunst; Roman Hovorka; Pierre Kalfon; James Krinsley; Eric Renard; Jean-Charles Preiser Journal: Crit Care Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 9.097