Literature DB >> 31787804

Population-Specific Models of Glycemic Control in Intensive Care: Towards a Simulation-Based Methodology for Protocol Optimization.

Stephen D Patek1, E Andy Ortiz1, Leon S Farhy2, Jennifer Mason Lobo3, James Isbell4, Jennifer L Kirby2, Anthony McCall2.   

Abstract

Stress-induced hyperglycemia is common in critically ill patients, where elevated blood glucose and glycemic variability have been found to contribute to infection, slow wound healing, and short-term mortality. Early clinical studies demonstrated improvement in mortality and morbidity resulting from intensive insulin therapy targeting euglycemia. Follow-up clinical studies have shown mixed results suggesting that the risk of hypoglycemia may outweigh the benefits of aggressive glycemic control. None of the prior studies clarify whether euglycemic targets are in themselves harmful, or if the danger lies in the inadequacy of the available methods for achieving desired glycemic outcomes. In this paper, we use a recently developed simulation model of stress hyperglycemia to demonstrate that given an insulin protocol glycemic outcomes are specific to the patient population under consideration, and that there is a need to optimize insulin therapy at the population level. Next, we use the simulator to demonstrate that the performance of Adaptive Proportional Feedback (APF), a popular format for computerized insulin therapy, is sensitive to its parameters, especially to the parameters that govern the aggressiveness of adaptation. Finally, we propose a framework for simulation-based protocol optimization using an objective function that penalizes below-range deviations more heavily than comparable deviations above.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 31787804      PMCID: PMC6885355          DOI: 10.1109/ACC.2015.7172132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Am Control Conf        ISSN: 0743-1619


  47 in total

Review 1.  Simulation and prediction of in vivo drug metabolism in human populations from in vitro data.

Authors:  Amin Rostami-Hodjegan; Geoffrey T Tucker
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 2.  In silico prediction of clinical efficacy.

Authors:  Seth Michelson; Anil Sehgal; Christina Friedrich
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 9.740

3.  Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Simon Finfer; Dean R Chittock; Steve Yu-Shuo Su; Deborah Blair; Denise Foster; Vinay Dhingra; Rinaldo Bellomo; Deborah Cook; Peter Dodek; William R Henderson; Paul C Hébert; Stephane Heritier; Daren K Heyland; Colin McArthur; Ellen McDonald; Imogen Mitchell; John A Myburgh; Robyn Norton; Julie Potter; Bruce G Robinson; Juan J Ronco
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Evaluating glycemic control algorithms by computer simulations.

Authors:  Malgorzata E Wilinska; Jan Blaha; Ludovic J Chassin; Jeremy J Cordingley; Natalie C Dormand; Martin Ellmerer; Martin Haluzik; Johannes Plank; Dirk Vlasselaers; Pieter J Wouters; Roman Hovorka
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  In silico preclinical trials: methodology and engineering guide to closed-loop control in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Stephen D Patek; B Wayne Bequette; Marc Breton; Bruce A Buckingham; Eyal Dassau; Francis J Doyle; John Lum; Lalo Magni; Howard Zisser
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-03-01

6.  Use of a computerized guideline for glucose regulation in the intensive care unit improved both guideline adherence and glucose regulation.

Authors:  Emmy Rood; Robert Jan Bosman; Johan Ids van der Spoel; Paul Taylor; Durk Freark Zandstra
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Average daily risk range as a measure of glycemic risk is associated with mortality in the intensive care unit: a retrospective study in a burn intensive care unit.

Authors:  Leon S Farhy; Edward A Ortiz; Boris P Kovatchev; Alejandra G Mora; Steven E Wolf; Charles E Wade
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-09-01

8.  In silico preclinical trials: a proof of concept in closed-loop control of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Boris P Kovatchev; Marc Breton; Chiara Dalla Man; Claudio Cobelli
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-01

9.  American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Diabetes Association consensus statement on inpatient glycemic control.

Authors:  Etie S Moghissi; Mary T Korytkowski; Monica DiNardo; Daniel Einhorn; Richard Hellman; Irl B Hirsch; Silvio E Inzucchi; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi; M Sue Kirkman; Guillermo E Umpierrez
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Computerized intensive insulin dosing can mitigate hypoglycemia and achieve tight glycemic control when glucose measurement is performed frequently and on time.

Authors:  Rattan Juneja; Corbin P Roudebush; Stanley A Nasraway; Adam A Golas; Judith Jacobi; Joni Carroll; Deborah Nelson; Victor J Abad; Samuel J Flanders
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.