Literature DB >> 21647660

Can femoroacetabular impingement and hip dysplasia be distinguished by clinical presentation and patient history?

Thomas Kappe1, Tugrul Kocak, Heiko Reichel, Christian R Fraitzl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Hip dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement may both lead to disability and hip osteoarthritis. The purpose of the current study was to compare the two entities in order to define differences in their clinical presentation.
METHODS: The clinical presentation and WOMAC items, subscales and overall sum score were compared between 37 patients with femoroacetabular impingement and 37 patients with hip dysplasia.
RESULTS: The average duration of symptoms was 33.3 ± 31.6 months in patients with femoroacetabular impingement and 34.5 ± 39.0 months in patients with dysplasia (p = 0.885). The anterosuperior impingement test was positive in all patients with femoroacetabular impingement and in 92% of hip dysplasia patients (p = 0.061). Mean internal rotation and abduction was significantly less in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (p = 0.001 and 0.007). The WOMAC subscales for pain, stiffness, and functionality as well as the overall sum score were not significantly different between patients with femoroacetabular impingement and patients with hip dysplasia. The qualitative analysis of WOMAC items revealed that symptoms related to sitting were significantly more often rated to be present in femoroacetabular impingement than in hip dysplasia patients. In the quantitative analysis, only the item 'getting in or out of a car' was rated significantly more severe in patients with femoroacetabular impingement.
CONCLUSION: In addition to obtaining a detailed history and examination, radiographic studies are needed for differentiation of the two entities and for the decision on treatment strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21647660     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1553-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  26 in total

1.  Anterior femoro-acetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion. Treatment with periacetabular osteotomy.

Authors:  K A Siebenrock; R Schoeniger; R Ganz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis--what the radiologist should know.

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Klaus A Siebenrock; Suzanne E Anderson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  The concept of femoroacetabular impingement: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Michael Leunig; Paul E Beaulé; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Hip-preserving surgery: understanding complex pathomorphology.

Authors:  Christopher L Peters; Jill A Erickson; Lucas Anderson; Andrew A Anderson; Jeff Weiss
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Prognostic value of chondral defects on the outcome after arthroscopic treatment of acetabular labral tears.

Authors:  Nikolaus A Streich; Tobias Gotterbarm; Alexander Barié; Holger Schmitt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  The acetabular rim syndrome. A clinical presentation of dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  K Klaue; C W Durnin; R Ganz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-05

7.  Femoral morphology differs between deficient and excessive acetabular coverage.

Authors:  S D Steppacher; M Tannast; S Werlen; K A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Clinical presentation of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Marc J Philippon; R Brian Maxwell; Todd L Johnston; Mara Schenker; Karen K Briggs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-05-12       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Construct validity of a 12-item WOMAC for assessment of femoro-acetabular impingement and osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  D A Rothenfluh; D Reedwisch; U Müller; R Ganz; A Tennant; M Leunig
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Relationship between offset angle alpha and hip chondral injury in femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Todd L Johnston; Mara L Schenker; Karen K Briggs; Marc J Philippon
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  6 in total

1.  Abnormal hip physical examination findings in asymptomatic female soccer athletes.

Authors:  Heidi Prather; Devyani Hunt; Monica Rho; Ted Yemm; Kathryn Fong; Robert H Brophy
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  What Are the Results of Surgical Treatment of Hip Dysplasia With Concomitant Cam Deformity?

Authors:  Jens Goronzy; Lea Franken; Albrecht Hartmann; Falk Thielemann; Anne Postler; Tobias Paulus; Klaus-Peter Günther
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Can radiographic morphometric parameters for the hip be assessed on MRI?

Authors:  David Stelzeneder; Andreas Hingsammer; Sarah D Bixby; Young-Jo Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Hip Arthroscopy in the Presence of Acetabular Dysplasia.

Authors:  Narlaka Jayasekera; Alessandro Aprato; Richard N Villar
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2015-05-29

Review 5.  The role of the acetabular labrum in hip dysplasia. A literature overview.

Authors:  Charlotte Hartig-Andreasen; Kjeld Søballe; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for cam or pincer morphology in individuals with suspected FAI syndrome: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rahel Caliesch; Martin Sattelmayer; Stephan Reichenbach; Marcel Zwahlen; Roger Hilfiker
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2020-04-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.