Literature DB >> 16582840

Effect of the increase in the height of lumbar disc space on facet joint articulation area in sagittal plane.

Jiayong Liu1, Nabil A Ebraheim, Steven P Haman, Qaiser Shafiq, Nakul Karkare, Ashok Biyani, Vijay K Goel, Lee Woldenberg.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Computerized tomography (CT) of the lumbar spine cadaveric specimens was used to evaluate the effect of increasing the height of the disc space in the lumbar spine to the facet joint articulation in the sagittal plane.
OBJECTIVE: To show how the facet joint articulation is affected by increasing the height of the disc space in the lumbar spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Charité Artificial Disc (DePuy Spine, Inc., Raynham, MA) was successful in relieving low back pain in the majority of patients, yet there was still a significant number of patients who did not obtain pain relief, or their pain even worsened. The etiology of their pain is still not known. To our knowledge, no study has addressed the effect on the facet joints when the disc height is increased.
METHODS: CT images passing through the center of the L3-S1 facet joints (sagittal plane) were obtained from 15 cadaveric lumbar spine specimens. The articulation overlap of facet joints in sagittal plane from the L3 to S1 was measured. A 1-mm incremental increase to a total 5 mm in disc space height was performed to simulate the changes seen in disc replacement. The change in the facet joint articulation overlap in sagittal plane at normal and each displacement was then measured. There were 5 lumbar spine specimens dissected to validate the technique and standardize the measurements. Mean, percentages, and standard deviation values were calculated for all measured dimensions.
RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the measurements on CT and gross specimens (P > 0.05). In 15 specimens, the mean facet joint articulation overlap on the sagittal plane was: 16.29 +/- 1.20 mm (left) and 16.22 +/- 1.16 (right) at the L3-L4 level; 17.81 +/- 1.18 mm (left) and 17.74 +/- 1.18 mm (right) at the L4-L5 level; and 18.18 +/- 1.18 mm (left) and 18.23 +/- 1.15 mm (right) at the L5-S1 level. There is no significant difference between the measured values on left and right sides (P > 0.05). Each 1-mm incremental increase in disc space at the L3-L4 level translated to a decrease in the facet joint articulation overlap in the sagittal plane by 6%, and the mean facet joint space increased 0.4 mm. At the L4-L5 level, the articulation overlap decreased by 6%, and the facet joint space increased 0.5 mm. At the L5-S1 level, the articulation overlap decreased by 4%, and the facet joint space increased 0.7 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant decrease of the facet joint articulation overlap in sagittal plane and an increase in the facet joint space following an increase in the lumbar disc space. The inappropriate increase of the height of disc space will result in facet joint subluxation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16582840     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000206387.67098.a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Revision surgery after implantation of a vertebral disc prosthesis].

Authors:  C Hopf
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Resect or not to resect: the role of posterior longitudinal ligament in lumbar total disc replacement.

Authors:  Balkan Cakir; Marcus Richter; Werner Schmoelz; René Schmidt; Heiko Reichel; Hans Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Measurement of the normal lumbar intervertebral disc space using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Chang Hwa Hong; Jong Seok Park; Ki Jin Jung; Woo Jong Kim
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2010-04-23

4.  Association of facet tropism and progressive facet arthrosis after lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc-L.

Authors:  Myung-Hoon Shin; Kyeong-Sik Ryu; Jung-Woo Hur; Jin-Sung Kim; Chun-Kun Park
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The role of prosthesis design on segmental biomechanics: semi-constrained versus unconstrained prostheses and anterior versus posterior centre of rotation.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; René Schmidt; Marcus Richter; Werner Schmoelz; Heiko Reichel; Balkan Cakir
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Total disc replacement in the lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Brian J C Freeman; James Davenport
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-22       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Analysis of post-operative pain patterns following total lumbar disc replacement: results from fluoroscopically guided spine infiltrations.

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Andreas Korge; Frank Grochulla; Christoph Mehren; H Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Parameters influencing the outcome after total disc replacement at the lumbosacral junction. Part 2: distraction and posterior translation lead to clinical failure after a mean follow-up of 5 years.

Authors:  Patrick Strube; Eike K Hoff; Marc Schürings; Hendrik Schmidt; Marcel Dreischarf; Antonius Rohlmann; Michael Putzier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

10.  Biomechanical evaluation of a spherical lumbar interbody device at varying levels of subsidence.

Authors:  Steven A Rundell; Jorge E Isaza; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2011-03-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.