BACKGROUND: It is currently unknown whether falling is independently associated with measures of balance and mobility in older adults after accounting for relevant physiological functions. This cross-sectional study assessed the independent association of falls-related self-efficacy to balance and mobility after accounting for age, current physical activity, and performances in relevant physiological domains in 98 older women, aged 75-86 years, with low bone mass. METHODS: Falls-related self-efficacy was assessed by the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC Scale). Measures of balance and mobility included the 13-item Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CB & M Scale) and gait speed under two conditions: normal-paced and fast-paced. Physiological assessment included postural sway, foot reaction time, dominant quadriceps and dorsiflexor strength, proprioception, tactile sensitivity, edge contrast sensitivity, and visual acuity. RESULTS: Falls-related self-efficacy was independently associated with both balance and mobility after accounting for age, current physical activity level, and performances in relevant physiological domains. Based on the standardized beta coefficients, the ABC Scale score was more associated with measures of balance and mobility than measures of physiological function. CONCLUSION: These results highlight the independent association of falls-related self-efficacy with physical performance in older women with low bone mass. Thus, clinicians may need to consider falls-related self-efficacy when assessing and treating balance and mobility in this population, and falls-related self-efficacy may be useful as a screening tool to identify those persons with impaired balance and mobility.
BACKGROUND: It is currently unknown whether falling is independently associated with measures of balance and mobility in older adults after accounting for relevant physiological functions. This cross-sectional study assessed the independent association of falls-related self-efficacy to balance and mobility after accounting for age, current physical activity, and performances in relevant physiological domains in 98 older women, aged 75-86 years, with low bone mass. METHODS: Falls-related self-efficacy was assessed by the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC Scale). Measures of balance and mobility included the 13-item Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CB & M Scale) and gait speed under two conditions: normal-paced and fast-paced. Physiological assessment included postural sway, foot reaction time, dominant quadriceps and dorsiflexor strength, proprioception, tactile sensitivity, edge contrast sensitivity, and visual acuity. RESULTS: Falls-related self-efficacy was independently associated with both balance and mobility after accounting for age, current physical activity level, and performances in relevant physiological domains. Based on the standardized beta coefficients, the ABC Scale score was more associated with measures of balance and mobility than measures of physiological function. CONCLUSION: These results highlight the independent association of falls-related self-efficacy with physical performance in older women with low bone mass. Thus, clinicians may need to consider falls-related self-efficacy when assessing and treating balance and mobility in this population, and falls-related self-efficacy may be useful as a screening tool to identify those persons with impaired balance and mobility.
Authors: Jennifer C Davis; Lindsay S Nagamatsu; Chun Liang Hsu; B Lynn Beattie; Teresa Liu-Ambrose Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2012-03-21 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Lindsay S Nagamatsu; Chun Liang Hsu; Jennifer C Davis; John R Best; Teresa Liu-Ambrose Journal: Exp Aging Res Date: 2016 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 1.645
Authors: Sara L Wright; Rachel E Kay; Erich T Avery; Bruno Giordani; Neil B Alexander Journal: J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol Date: 2011-06-24 Impact factor: 2.680
Authors: Teresa Liu-Ambrose; Jennifer C Davis; Lindsay S Nagamatsu; Chun Liang Hsu; Lindsay A Katarynych; Karim M Khan Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2010-05-19 Impact factor: 3.921