Literature DB >> 8576489

Clustered breast microcalcifications: evaluation by dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI.

R Gilles1, M Meunier, O Lucidarme, B Zafrani, J M Guinebretière, A A Tardivon, M Le Gal, D Vanel, S Neuenschwander, R Arriagada.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to evaluate dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI in the diagnosis of isolated clustered calcifications of the breast.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-two patients underwent surgical biopsy for isolated clustered breast calcifications. Their mammograms showed round (n = 88) or linear/irregular (n = 84) microcalcifications. All patients had a preoperative Gd-DOTA-enhanced subtraction dynamic study. Any early contrast enhancement in the breast parenchyma concomitant with early enhancement of normal vessels was considered positive.
RESULTS: Fifty-eight in situ carcinomas, 22 invasive carcinomas, and 92 benign lesions were found at histological analysis. Dynamic MR sequences showed early contrast enhancement in 76 of 80 malignant lesions (sensitivity 95%) and in 45 of 92 benign lesions (specificity 51%). Two invasive and two intraductal carcinomas did not show early contrast enhancement. Three independent observers agreed in rating early contrast enhancement in 143 of 172 lesions.
CONCLUSION: Poor specificity limits the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI in distinguishing benign from malignant microcalcifications on mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8576489     DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199601000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  14 in total

1.  The clinical value of bilateral breast MR imaging: is it worth performing on patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography?

Authors:  Ayano Akita; Akihiro Tanimoto; Hiromitsu Jinno; Kaori Kameyama; Sachio Kuribayashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  What is the sensitivity of mammography and dynamic MR imaging for DCIS if the whole-breast histopathology is used as a reference standard?

Authors:  F Sardanelli; L Bacigalupo; L Carbonaro; A Esseridou; G M Giuseppetti; P Panizza; V Lattanzio; A Del Maschio
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  In situ and minimally invasive breast cancer: morphologic and kinetic features on contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  P Viehweg; D Lampe; J Buchmann; S H Heywang-Köbrunner
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  US and MRI in the evaluation of mammographic BI-RADS 4 and 5 microcalcifications.

Authors:  Ana Hrkac Pustahija; Gordana Ivanac; Boris Brkljacic
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.630

5.  Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI.

Authors:  N Morakkabati-Spitz; C Leutner; H Schild; F Traeber; C Kuhl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  The adjacent vessel sign on breast MRI: new data and a subgroup analysis for 1,084 histologically verified cases.

Authors:  Matthias Dietzel; Pascal A T Baltzer; Tibor Vag; Aimee Herzog; Mieczyslaw Gajda; Oumar Camara; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: X-ray fluorescence microscopy and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging reveals gadolinium uptake within neoplastic mammary ducts in a murine model.

Authors:  Sanaz A Jansen; Tatjana Paunesku; Xiaobing Fan; Gayle E Woloschak; Stefan Vogt; Suzanne D Conzen; Thomas Krausz; Gillian M Newstead; Gregory S Karczmar
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  3-5 BI-RADs Microcalcifications: Correlation between MRI and Histological Findings.

Authors:  Valeria Fiaschetti; Chiara Adriana Pistolese; Tommaso Perretta; Elsa Cossu; Chiara Arganini; Claudia Salimbeni; Angela Lia Scarano; Silvia Arduini; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2011-08-25

9.  Should we use MRI to screen women at high-risk of breast cancer?

Authors:  F J Gilbert
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Differentiation of breast cancer from fibroadenoma with dual-echo dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Shiwei Wang; Zachary Delproposto; Haoyu Wang; Xuewei Ding; Conghua Ji; Bei Wang; Maosheng Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.