Literature DB >> 19863584

The distribution and hypothesis testing of eigenvalues from the canonical analysis of the gamma matrix of quadratic and correlational selection gradients.

Richard J Reynolds1, Douglas K Childers, Nicholas M Pajewski.   

Abstract

Canonical analysis measures nonlinear selection on latent axes from a rotation of the gamma matrix (gamma) of quadratic and correlation selection gradients. Here, we document that the conventional method of testing eigenvalues (double regression) under the null hypothesis of no nonlinear selection is incorrect. Through simulation we demonstrate that under the null the expectation of some eigenvalues from canonical analysis will be nonzero, which leads to unacceptably high type 1 error rates. Using a two-trait example, we prove that the expectations for both eigenvalues depend on the sampling variability of the estimates in gamma. An appropriate test is to slightly modify the double regression method by calculating permutation P-values for the ordered eigenvalues, which maintains correct type 1 error rates. Using simulated data of nonlinear selection on male guppy ornamentation, we show that the statistical power to detect curvature with canonical analysis is higher compared to relying on the estimates from gamma alone. We provide a simple R script for permutation testing of the eigenvalues to distinguish curvature in the selection surface induced by nonlinear selection from curvature induced by random processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19863584      PMCID: PMC2857515          DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00874.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  16 in total

1.  Measuring nonlinear selection.

Authors:  Mark W Blows; Robert Brooks
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Power and potential bias in field studies of natural selection.

Authors:  Erika I Hersch; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Orientation of the genetic variance-covariance matrix and the fitness surface for multiple male sexually selected traits.

Authors:  Mark W Blows; Stephen F Chenoweth; Emma Hine
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 4.  Theoretical models of selection and mutation on quantitative traits.

Authors:  Toby Johnson; Nick Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  A tale of two methods: putting biology before statistics in the study of phenotypic evolution.

Authors:  J K Conner
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 6.  A tale of two matrices: multivariate approaches in evolutionary biology.

Authors:  M W Blows
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Direct and indirect sexual selection and quantitative genetics of male traits in guppies (Poecilia reticulata).

Authors:  R Brooks; J A Endler
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Exploring complex fitness surfaces: multiple ornamentation and polymorphism in male guppies.

Authors:  Mark W Blows; Robert Brooks; Peter G Kraft
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Experimental evidence for multivariate stabilizing sexual selection.

Authors:  Robert Brooks; John Hunt; Mark W Blows; Michael J Smith; Luc F Bussière; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Patterns and mechanisms of selection on a family-diagnostic trait: evidence from experimental manipulation and lifetime fitness selection gradients.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Conner; Amber M Rice; Christy Stewart; Martin T Morgan
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  13 in total

1.  Predation shapes sperm performance surfaces in guppies.

Authors:  Alessandro Devigili; Jonathan P Evans; John L Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Unravelling anisogamy: egg size and ejaculate size mediate selection on morphology in free-swimming sperm.

Authors:  Keyne Monro; Dustin J Marshall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Eigenvalue significance testing for genetic association.

Authors:  Yi-Hui Zhou; J S Marron; Fred A Wright
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Penis size interacts with body shape and height to influence male attractiveness.

Authors:  Brian S Mautz; Bob B M Wong; Richard A Peters; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Temporal variation in selection on male and female traits in wild tree crickets.

Authors:  Kyla Ercit
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Concordance between stabilizing sexual selection, intraspecific variation, and interspecific divergence in Phymata.

Authors:  David Punzalan; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Multivariate selection drives concordant patterns of pre- and postcopulatory sexual selection in a livebearing fish.

Authors:  Alessandro Devigili; Jonathan P Evans; Andrea Di Nisio; Andrea Pilastro
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Multivariate sexual selection on male song structure in wild populations of sagebrush crickets, Cyphoderris strepitans (Orthoptera: Haglidae).

Authors:  Geoffrey D Ower; Kevin A Judge; Sandra Steiger; Kyle J Caron; Rebecca A Smith; John Hunt; Scott K Sakaluk
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Sexual Selection on male cuticular hydrocarbons via male-male competition and female choice.

Authors:  S M Lane; A W Dickinson; T Tregenza; C M House
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Pre and Post-copulatory Selection Favor Similar Genital Phenotypes in the Male Broad Horned Beetle.

Authors:  Clarissa M House; M D Sharma; Kensuke Okada; David J Hosken
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.326

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.