Literature DB >> 19862698

Regional impact of field strength on voxel-based morphometry results.

Christine L Tardif1, D Louis Collins, G Bruce Pike.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to characterize the sensitivity of voxel-based morphometry (VBM) results to choice field strength. We chose to investigate the two most widespread acquisition sequences for VBM, FLASH and MP-RAGE, at 1.5 and 3 T. We first evaluated image quality of the four acquisition protocols in terms of SNR and image uniformity. We then performed a VBM study on eight subjects scanned twice using the four protocols to evaluate differences in grey matter (GM) density and corresponding scan-rescan variability, and a power analysis for each protocol in the context a longitudinal and cross-sectional VBM study. As expected, the SNR increased significantly at 3 T for both FLASH and MP-RAGE. Image non-uniformity increased as well, in particular for MP-RAGE. The differences in CNR and contrast non-uniformity cause regional biases between protocols in the VBM results, in particular between sequences at 3 T. The power analysis results show an overall decrease in the number of subjects required in a longitudinal study to detect a difference in GM density at 3 T for MP-RAGE, but an increase for FLASH. The number of subjects required in a cross-sectional VBM study is higher at 3 T for both sequences. Our results show that each protocol has a distinct regional sensitivity pattern to morphometric change, which goes against the classical view of VBM as an unbiased whole brain analysis technique, complicates the combination of data within a VBM study and the direct comparison of VBM studies based on different protocols. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19862698      PMCID: PMC6871228          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  35 in total

Review 1.  Voxel-based morphometry--the methods.

Authors:  J Ashburner; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Rapid combined T1 and T2 mapping using gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state.

Authors:  Sean C L Deoni; Brian K Rutt; Terry M Peters
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Reliability of MRI-derived measurements of human cerebral cortical thickness: the effects of field strength, scanner upgrade and manufacturer.

Authors:  Xiao Han; Jorge Jovicich; David Salat; Andre van der Kouwe; Brian Quinn; Silvester Czanner; Evelina Busa; Jenni Pacheco; Marilyn Albert; Ronald Killiany; Paul Maguire; Diana Rosas; Nikos Makris; Anders Dale; Bradford Dickerson; Bruce Fischl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Intensity non-uniformity correction using N3 on 3-T scanners with multichannel phased array coils.

Authors:  Richard G Boyes; Jeff L Gunter; Chris Frost; Andrew L Janke; Thomas Yeatman; Derek L G Hill; Matt A Bernstein; Paul M Thompson; Michael W Weiner; Norbert Schuff; Gene E Alexander; Ronald J Killiany; Charles DeCarli; Clifford R Jack; Nick C Fox
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Clinical comparison of three-dimensional MP-RAGE and FLASH techniques for MR imaging of the head.

Authors:  V M Runge; J E Kirsch; G S Thomas; J P Mugler
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Rapid three-dimensional T1-weighted MR imaging with the MP-RAGE sequence.

Authors:  J P Mugler; J R Brookeman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo imaging (3D MP RAGE).

Authors:  J P Mugler; J R Brookeman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Standing-wave and RF penetration artifacts caused by elliptic geometry: an electrodynamic analysis of MRI.

Authors:  J G Sled; G B Pike
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 9.  The Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative.

Authors:  Susanne G Mueller; Michael W Weiner; Leon J Thal; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford Jack; William Jagust; John Q Trojanowski; Arthur W Toga; Laurel Beckett
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Brain changes in children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder before and after treatment: a voxel-based morphometric MRI study.

Authors:  Luisa Lázaro; Nuria Bargalló; Josefina Castro-Fornieles; Carles Falcón; Susana Andrés; Rosa Calvo; Carme Junqué
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 3.222

View more
  23 in total

1.  Longitudinal gray matter changes in multiple sclerosis--differential scanner and overall disease-related effects.

Authors:  Kerstin Bendfeldt; Louis Hofstetter; Pascal Kuster; Stefan Traud; Nicole Mueller-Lenke; Yvonne Naegelin; Ludwig Kappos; Achim Gass; Thomas E Nichols; Frederik Barkhof; Hugo Vrenken; Stefan D Roosendaal; Jeroen J G Geurts; Ernst-Wilhelm Radue; Stefan J Borgwardt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Partial volume effect modeling for segmentation and tissue classification of brain magnetic resonance images: A review.

Authors:  Jussi Tohka
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-11-28

3.  Automatic Thalamus Segmentation on Unenhanced 3D T1 Weighted Images: Comparison of Publicly Available Segmentation Methods in a Pediatric Population.

Authors:  Salem Hannoun; Rayyan Tutunji; Maria El Homsi; Stephanie Saaybi; Roula Hourani
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2019-07

Review 4.  Studying neuroanatomy using MRI.

Authors:  Jason P Lerch; André J W van der Kouwe; Armin Raznahan; Tomáš Paus; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Karla L Miller; Stephen M Smith; Bruce Fischl; Stamatios N Sotiropoulos
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  An automatic framework for quantitative validation of voxel based morphometry measures of anatomical brain asymmetry.

Authors:  Antonietta Pepe; Ivo Dinov; Jussi Tohka
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Distinctive Neuroanatomical Substrates for Depression in Bipolar Disorder versus Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Koji Matsuo; Kenichiro Harada; Yusuke Fujita; Yasumasa Okamoto; Miho Ota; Hisashi Narita; Benson Mwangi; Carlos A Gutierrez; Go Okada; Masahiro Takamura; Hirotaka Yamagata; Ichiro Kusumi; Hiroshi Kunugi; Takeshi Inoue; Jair C Soares; Shigeto Yamawaki; Yoshifumi Watanabe
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  The impact of lesion in-painting and registration methods on voxel-based morphometry in detecting regional cerebral gray matter atrophy in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  A Ceccarelli; J S Jackson; S Tauhid; A Arora; J Gorky; E Dell'Oglio; A Bakshi; T Chitnis; S J Khoury; H L Weiner; C R G Guttmann; R Bakshi; M Neema
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Optimization of magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo (MP-RAGE) sequence for neonatal brain MRI.

Authors:  Lili He; Jinghua Wang; Zhong-Lin Lu; Beth M Kline-Fath; Nehal A Parikh
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-05-02

9.  Power estimation for non-standardized multisite studies.

Authors:  Anisha Keshavan; Friedemann Paul; Mona K Beyer; Alyssa H Zhu; Nico Papinutto; Russell T Shinohara; William Stern; Michael Amann; Rohit Bakshi; Antje Bischof; Alessandro Carriero; Manuel Comabella; Jason C Crane; Sandra D'Alfonso; Philippe Demaerel; Benedicte Dubois; Massimo Filippi; Vinzenz Fleischer; Bertrand Fontaine; Laura Gaetano; An Goris; Christiane Graetz; Adriane Gröger; Sergiu Groppa; David A Hafler; Hanne F Harbo; Bernhard Hemmer; Kesshi Jordan; Ludwig Kappos; Gina Kirkish; Sara Llufriu; Stefano Magon; Filippo Martinelli-Boneschi; Jacob L McCauley; Xavier Montalban; Mark Mühlau; Daniel Pelletier; Pradip M Pattany; Margaret Pericak-Vance; Isabelle Cournu-Rebeix; Maria A Rocca; Alex Rovira; Regina Schlaeger; Albert Saiz; Till Sprenger; Alessandro Stecco; Bernard M J Uitdehaag; Pablo Villoslada; Mike P Wattjes; Howard Weiner; Jens Wuerfel; Claus Zimmer; Frauke Zipp; Stephen L Hauser; Jorge R Oksenberg; Roland G Henry
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Influence of magnetic field strength and image registration strategy on voxel-based morphometry in a study of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Artur Marchewka; Ferath Kherif; Gunnar Krueger; Anna Grabowska; Richard Frackowiak; Bogdan Draganski
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.