Literature DB >> 19861590

Does functional electrical stimulation for foot drop strengthen corticospinal connections?

Dirk G Everaert1, Aiko K Thompson, Su Ling Chong, Richard B Stein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term use of a foot-drop stimulator applying functional electrical stimulation (FES) to the common peroneal nerve improves walking performance even when the stimulator is off. This "therapeutic" effect might result from neuroplastic changes.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of long-term use of a foot-drop stimulator on residual corticospinal connections in people with central nervous system disorders.
METHODS: Ten people with nonprogressive disorders (eg, stroke) and 26 with progressive disorders (eg, multiple sclerosis) used a foot-drop stimulator for 3 to 12 months while walking in the community. Walking performance and electrophysiological variables were measured before and after FES use. From the surface electromyogram of the tibialis anterior muscle, we measured the following: (1) motor-evoked potential (MEP) from transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex, (2) maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), and (3) maximum motor wave (M(max)) from stimulating the common peroneal nerve.
RESULTS: After using FES, MEP and MVC increased significantly by comparable amounts, 50% and 48%, respectively, in the nonprogressive group and 27% and 17% in the progressive group; the changes were positively correlated (R(2) = .35; P < .001). Walking speed increased with the stimulator off (therapeutic effect) by 24% (P = .008) and 7% (P = .014) in the nonprogressive and progressive groups, respectively. The changes in M(max) were small and not correlated with changes in MEP.
CONCLUSIONS: The large increases in MVC and MEP suggest that regular use of a foot-drop stimulator strengthens activation of motor cortical areas and their residual descending connections, which may explain the therapeutic effect on walking speed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19861590     DOI: 10.1177/1545968309349939

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  56 in total

1.  Efficient neuroplasticity induction in chronic stroke patients by an associative brain-computer interface.

Authors:  Natalie Mrachacz-Kersting; Ning Jiang; Andrew James Thomas Stevenson; Imran Khan Niazi; Vladimir Kostic; Aleksandra Pavlovic; Sasa Radovanovic; Milica Djuric-Jovicic; Federica Agosta; Kim Dremstrup; Dario Farina
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Effects of functional electrical stimulation on gait recovery post-neurological injury during inpatient rehabilitation.

Authors:  Chad I Lairamore; Mark K Garrison; Laetitia Bourgeon; Mark Mennemeier
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2014-08-25

3.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation has a global effect on corticospinal excitability for leg muscles and a focused effect for hand muscles.

Authors:  C S Mang; J M Clair; D F Collins
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Repetitive common peroneal nerve stimulation increases ankle dorsiflexor motor evoked potentials in incomplete spinal cord lesions.

Authors:  Aiko K Thompson; Brandon Lapallo; Michael Duffield; Briana M Abel; Ferne Pomerantz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Modulation of corticospinal input to the legs by arm and leg cycling in people with incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  R Zhou; L Alvarado; S Kim; S L Chong; V K Mushahwar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Short-term inhibition of spinal reflexes in multiple lower limb muscles after neuromuscular electrical stimulation of ankle plantar flexors.

Authors:  Matija Milosevic; Yohei Masugi; Hiroki Obata; Atsushi Sasaki; Milos R Popovic; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation: implications of the electrically evoked sensory volley.

Authors:  A J Bergquist; J M Clair; O Lagerquist; C S Mang; Y Okuma; D F Collins
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Automated FES for Upper Limb Rehabilitation Following Stroke and Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Edmund F Hodkin; Yuming Lei; Jonathan Humby; Isabel S Glover; Supriyo Choudhury; Hrishikesh Kumar; Monica A Perez; Helen Rodgers; Andrew Jackson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Spike-timing-dependent plasticity in primate corticospinal connections induced during free behavior.

Authors:  Yukio Nishimura; Steve I Perlmutter; Ryan W Eaton; Eberhard E Fetz
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  EMG of the tibialis anterior demonstrates a training effect after utilization of a foot drop stimulator.

Authors:  Rakesh Pilkar; Mathew Yarossi; Karen J Nolan
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 2.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.