Literature DB >> 19858720

Bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users compared on speech perception in noise.

Camille C Dunn1, William Noble, Richard S Tyler, Monika Kordus, Bruce J Gantz, Haihong Ji.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Compare speech performance in noise with matched bilateral cochlear implant (CICI) and unilateral cochlear implant (CI only) users.
DESIGN: Thirty CICI and 30 CI-only subjects were tested on a battery of speech perception tests in noise that use an eight-loudspeaker array.
RESULTS: On average, CICI subject's performance with speech in noise was significantly better than the CI-only subjects.
CONCLUSION: The CICI group showed significantly better performance on speech perception in noise compared with the CI-only subjects, supporting the hypothesis that CICI is more beneficial than CI only.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19858720      PMCID: PMC2836420          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181c12383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  8 in total

1.  Speech intelligibility and localization in a multi-source environment.

Authors:  M L Hawley; R Y Litovsky; H S Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.

Authors:  Ginger S Stickney; Fan-Gang Zeng; Ruth Litovsky; Peter Assmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The role of head-induced interaural time and level differences in the speech reception threshold for multiple interfering sound sources.

Authors:  John F Culling; Monica L Hawley; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Christopher W Turner; Bruce J Gantz; Corina Vidal; Amy Behrens; Belinda A Henry
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Comparison of speech recognition and localization performance in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users matched on duration of deafness and age at implantation.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Richard S Tyler; Sarah Oakley; Bruce J Gantz; William Noble
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Release from masking due to spatial separation of sources in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns.

Authors:  G Kidd; C R Mason; T L Rohtla; P S Deliwala
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants and the implant-plus-hearing-aid profile: comparing self-assessed and measured abilities.

Authors:  William Noble; Richard Tyler; Camille Dunn; Navjot Bhullar
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).

Authors:  Stuart Gatehouse; William Noble
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.117

  8 in total
  21 in total

Review 1.  Brain control and information transfer.

Authors:  Edward J Tehovnik; Lewis L Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Transitioning from bimodal to bilateral cochlear implant listening: speech recognition and localization in four individuals.

Authors:  Lisa G Potts; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.493

3.  Pitch Matching Adapts Even for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users with Relatively Small Initial Pitch Differences Across the Ears.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Hannah E Staisloff; Abbigail Kirchner; Daniel H Lee; Julia Stelmach
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-08-05

4.  Localization performance correlates with binaural fusion for interaurally mismatched vocoded speech.

Authors:  Deepa Suneel; Hannah Staisloff; Corey S Shayman; Julia Stelmach; Justin M Aronoff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Determining the minimum number of electrodes that need to be pitch matched to accurately estimate pitch matches across the array.

Authors:  Julia Stelmach; David M Landsberger; Monica Padilla; Justin M Aronoff
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  The effect of different cochlear implant microphones on acoustic hearing individuals' binaural benefits for speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Daniel J Freed; Laurel M Fisher; Ivan Pal; Sigfrid D Soli
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Unilateral spectral and temporal compression reduces binaural fusion for normal hearing listeners with cochlear implant simulations.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Corey Shayman; Akila Prasad; Deepa Suneel; Julia Stelmach
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-12-27       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Listening Effort Measured in Adults with Normal Hearing and Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Ann E Perreau; Yu-Hsiang Wu; Bailey Tatge; Diana Irwin; Daniel Corts
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Self-reported spatial hearing abilities across different cochlear implant profiles.

Authors:  Ann E Perreau; Hua Ou; Richard Tyler; Camille Dunn
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.493

10.  Spoken language benefits of extending cochlear implant candidacy below 12 months of age.

Authors:  Johanna G Nicholas; Ann E Geers
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.