Literature DB >> 28964063

Localization performance correlates with binaural fusion for interaurally mismatched vocoded speech.

Deepa Suneel1, Hannah Staisloff1, Corey S Shayman1, Julia Stelmach1, Justin M Aronoff1.   

Abstract

Bilateral cochlear implant users often have difficulty fusing sounds from the two ears into a single percept. However, measuring fusion can be difficult, particularly with cochlear implant users who may have no reference for a fully fused percept. As a first step to address this, this study examined how localization performance of normal hearing subjects relates to binaural fusion. The stimuli were vocoded speech tokens with various interaural mismatches. The results reveal that the percentage of stimuli perceived as fused was correlated with localization performance, suggesting that changes in localization performance can serve as an indicator for binaural fusion changes.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28964063      PMCID: PMC5724736          DOI: 10.1121/1.5001903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

1.  Studies on bilateral cochlear implants at the University of Wisconsin's Binaural Hearing and Speech Laboratory.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell; Shelly Godar; Tina Grieco-Calub; Gary L Jones; Soha N Garadat; Smita Agrawal; Alan Kan; Ann Todd; Christi Hess; Sara Misurelli
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  The use of interaural time and level difference cues by bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Yang-Soo Yoon; Daniel J Freed; Andrew J Vermiglio; Ivan Pal; Sigfrid D Soli
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Cochlear implant patients' localization using interaural level differences exceeds that of untrained normal hearing listeners.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Daniel J Freed; Laurel M Fisher; Ivan Pal; Sigfrid D Soli
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on binaural fusion and lateralization in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Corey Stoelb; Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later.

Authors:  D D Greenwood
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on the salience of binaural cues in conditions that simulate bilateral cochlear-implant listening.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Corey Stoelb; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Bilateral Loudness Balancing and Distorted Spatial Perception in Recipients of Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Matthew B Fitzgerald; Alan Kan; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Unilateral spectral and temporal compression reduces binaural fusion for normal hearing listeners with cochlear implant simulations.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Corey Shayman; Akila Prasad; Deepa Suneel; Julia Stelmach
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-12-27       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Clinically Paired Electrodes Are Often Not Perceived as Pitch Matched.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Monica Padilla; Julia Stelmach; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-09-18       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  8 in total

1.  Cochlear implants and other inner ear prostheses: today and tomorrow.

Authors:  Lina Aj Reiss
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2020-08-14

2.  Counting or discriminating the number of voices to assess binaural fusion with single-sided vocoders.

Authors:  Jessica M Wess; Nathaniel J Spencer; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Computed-Tomography Estimates of Interaural Mismatch in Insertion Depth and Scalar Location in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Jack H Noble; Sandeep A Phatak; Elizabeth Kolberg; Miranda Cleary; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Kenneth K Jensen; Michael Hoa; Hung Jeffrey Kim; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.619

4.  Effects of tonotopic matching and spatial cues on segregation of competing speech in simulations of bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Mathew Thomas; Shelby Willis; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Effects of Spectral Resolution and Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Kevin Xu; Shelby Willis; Quinton Gopen; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

6.  Interaural Place-of-Stimulation Mismatch Estimates Using CT Scans and Binaural Perception, But Not Pitch, Are Consistent in Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Kenneth K Jensen; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Jack H Noble; Michael Hoa; H Jeffery Kim; Robert Shih; Elizabeth Kolberg; Miranda Cleary; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 6.709

7.  Interaural Time-Difference Discrimination as a Measure of Place of Stimulation for Cochlear-Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Gerald I Schuchman; Kenneth K Jensen; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Effects of Cochlear Implantation on Binaural Hearing in Adults With Unilateral Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Margaret T Dillon; Meredith A Rooth; English R King; Ellen J Deres; Craig A Buchman; Harold C Pillsbury; Kevin D Brown
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.