Literature DB >> 19852660

Self-ligation esthetic brackets with low frictional resistance.

John C Voudouris1, Christos Schismenos, Kresimir Lackovic, Mladen M Kuftinec.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the frictional resistance forces (FRS) generated between several archwires and (1) interactive self-ligating (ISL) brackets and (2) conventionally ligated (CL) brackets.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Frictional forces produced between three different archwire combinations and self-ligating (SL) brackets (ceramic and metal-slot or all-metal) and CL brackets (metal or ceramic) were evaluated in a dry environment. The three ISL brackets tested were In-Ovation-C, In-Ovation-R, and Damon 3. The three CL brackets were Mystique with Neo Clip, Clarity, and Ovation. Each bracket was tested with 0.020'' SS, 0.019'' x 0.025'' SS and 0.018'' x 0.018'' coated SS.
RESULTS: The ISL brackets generally exhibited the lowest frictional forces irrespective of the bracket material and the wire size, and CL brackets exhibited consistently higher frictional forces. Mystique with Neo Clip produced the lowest frictional resistance of all brackets. The In-Ovation-C brackets demonstrated significantly lower frictional resistance than the SL brackets In-Ovation-R and Damon 3 as well as the CL brackets Clarity and Ovation.
CONCLUSIONS: The ISL ceramic brackets produced the lowest frictional resistance of all the self-ligating brackets. The CL ceramic brackets produced the greatest friction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19852660      PMCID: PMC8978741          DOI: 10.2319/110608-565.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  30 in total

1.  Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states.

Authors:  G A Thorstenson; R P Kusy
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Comparison of resistance to sliding between different self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and saliva states.

Authors:  Glenys A Thorstenson; Robert P Kusy
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Seven clinical principles of interactive twin mechanisms.

Authors:  J C Voudouris
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1997-01

4.  The effect of ligation method on friction in sliding mechanics.

Authors:  Max Hain; Ashish Dhopatkar; Peter Rock
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Frictional resistance of ceramic and stainless steel orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  D H Pratten; K Popli; N Germane; J C Gunsolley
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Letter: Elastic ligatures, binding forces, and anchorage taxation.

Authors:  R C Thurow
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1975-06

7.  Self-ligating vs conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects.

Authors:  Nikolaos Pandis; Argy Polychronopoulou; Theodore Eliades
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Frictional changes in force values caused by saliva substitution.

Authors:  K L Baker; L G Nieberg; A D Weimer; M Hanna
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  The dynamic frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and arch wires.

Authors:  M Tselepis; P Brockhurst; V C West
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  A comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligation bracket systems.

Authors:  P K Shivapuja; J Berger
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  13 in total

1.  Ceramic brackets and low friction : A possible synergy in patients requiring multiple MRI scanning.

Authors:  Matteo Camporesi; Mariana Bulhoes Galvão; André Tortamano; Gladys Cristina Dominguez; Nicolò Defraia; Efisio Defraia; Lorenzo Franchi
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Friction properties according to vertical and horizontal tooth displacement and bracket type during initial leveling and alignment.

Authors:  Wook Heo; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Comparative Evaluation of Two Bracket Systems' Kinetic Friction: Conventional and Self-Ligating.

Authors:  Aurel-Claudiu Vartolomei; Dan-Cosmin Serbanoiu; Dana-Valentina Ghiga; Marioara Moldovan; Stanca Cuc; Maria Cristina Figueiredo Pollmann; Mariana Pacurar
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Effect of applied moment on resistance to sliding among esthetic self-ligating brackets.

Authors:  Benjamin T Pliska; Rick W Fuchs; John P Beyer; Brent E Larson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Factors influencing treatment efficiency.

Authors:  Min-Ho Jung
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva--an in vitro evaluation.

Authors:  Tatiana Kelly da Silva Fidalgo; Matheus Melo Pithon; José Vinicius Bolognesi Maciel; Ana Maria Bolognese
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Friction forces during sliding of various brackets for malaligned teeth: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Vito Crincoli; Letizia Perillo; Maria Beatrice Di Bisceglie; Antonio Balsamo; Vitaliano Serpico; Francesco Chiatante; Carmine Pappalettere; Antonio Boccaccio
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-02-28

8.  In vitro evaluation of resistance to sliding in self-ligating and conventional bracket systems during dental alignment.

Authors:  Giancarlo Cordasco; Antonino Lo Giudice; Angela Militi; Riccardo Nucera; Giuseppe Triolo; Giovanni Matarese
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 1.372

9.  Analysis of the characteristics of slot design affecting resistance to sliding during active archwire configurations.

Authors:  Riccardo Nucera; Antonino Lo Giudice; Giovanni Matarese; Alessandro Artemisia; Ennio Bramanti; Paolo Crupi; Giancarlo Cordasco
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.750

10.  Comparison of the frictional resistance between archwire and different bracket system: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Ajith R Pillai; Anil Gangadharan; Satheesh Kumar; Anwar Shah
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2014-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.