Literature DB >> 2239837

Frictional resistance of ceramic and stainless steel orthodontic brackets.

D H Pratten1, K Popli, N Germane, J C Gunsolley.   

Abstract

Frictional resistance of orthodontic appliances is recognized by most clinicians to be detrimental to tooth movement. The purpose of this study was to compare planar, static frictional forces among stainless steel and ceramic brackets. Both nitinol and stainless steel rectangular arch wires were passed freely through the slots of a pair of brackets from each type. Tests were carried out in air and in artificial saliva. A 300-gm load was suspended from the arch wire to simulate the normal force, and an incremental horizontal force was applied until movement of the arch wire was initiated. Under all conditions, the stainless steel brackets had lower coefficients of friction than the ceramic brackets. The stainless steel wire generated less friction than nitinol, and friction increased in the presence of artificial saliva in comparison with air alone. These results show that, under experimental conditions, ceramic brackets, nitinol arch wires, and saliva all increase static frictional resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2239837     DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81647-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  30 in total

1.  A comparative study of frictional force in self-ligating brackets according to the bracket-archwire angulation, bracket material, and wire type.

Authors:  Souk Min Lee; Chung-Ju Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  Prophylaxis protocols and their impact on bracket friction force.

Authors:  Sérgio Elias Neves Cury; Silvio Augusto Bellini-Pereira; Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo; Sérgio Schneider; Arnaldo Pinzan; Guilherme Janson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Comparison of frictional resistance between self-ligating and conventional brackets tied with elastomeric and metal ligature in orthodontic archwires.

Authors:  Vanessa Vieira Leite; Murilo Baena Lopes; Alcides Gonini Júnior; Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida; Sandra Kiss Moura; Renato Rodrigues de Almeida
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 May-Jun

4.  Friction between Archwire of Different Sizes, Cross Section, Alloy and Brackets Ligated with Different Brands of Low Friction Elastic Ligatures- An Invitro Study.

Authors:  Bhushan Patil; Neeraj Suresh Patil; Veerendra Virupaxappa Kerudi; Shrikant Shrinivas Chitko; Amit Ratanlal Maheshwari; Harshal Ashok Patil; Nikhita Popatrao Pekhale; Pawankumar Dnyandeo Tekale
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-04-01

5.  Influence of thermal or chemical degradation on the frictional force of an experimental coated NiTi wire.

Authors:  Ana Maria Bezerra Bandeira; Marcia Pereira Alves dos Santos; Gino Pulitini; Carlos Nelson Elias; Marysilva Ferreira da Costa
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Active and passive self-ligation-a myth?

Authors:  Lorenz M Brauchli; Christiane Senn; Andrea Wichelhaus
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  The clinical and laboratory effects of bracket type during canine distalization with sliding mechanics.

Authors:  A Alper Oz; Nursel Arici; Selim Arici
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Self-ligation esthetic brackets with low frictional resistance.

Authors:  John C Voudouris; Christos Schismenos; Kresimir Lackovic; Mladen M Kuftinec
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Enamel Surface Damage following Debonding of Ceramic Brackets: A Hospital-Based Study.

Authors:  Neelutpal Bora; Putul Mahanta; Deepjyoti Kalita; Sangeeta Deka; Ranjumoni Konwar; Chiranjita Phukan
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2021-05-06

10.  Effect of bracket bevel design and oral environmental factors on frictional resistance.

Authors:  Chen-Jung Chang; Tzer-Min Lee; Jia-Kuang Liu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.