Literature DB >> 7977187

A comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligation bracket systems.

P K Shivapuja1, J Berger.   

Abstract

The increased use of self-ligating bracket systems frequently raises the question of how they compare with conventional ligation systems. An in vitro and clinical investigation was undertaken to evaluate and compare these distinctly different groups, by using five different brackets. The Activa ("A" Company, Johnson & Johnson, San Diego, Calif.), Edgelok (Ormco, Glendora, Calif.), and SPEED (Strite Industries Ltd., Cambridge, Ontario) self-ligating bracket systems displayed a significantly lower level of frictional resistance, dramatically less chairtime for arch wire removal and insertion, and promoted improved infection control, when compared with polyurethane elastomeric and stainless steel tie wire ligation for ceramic and metal twin brackets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7977187     DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70069-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  33 in total

1.  The influence of bracket design on frictional losses in the bracket/arch wire system.

Authors:  H A Schumacher; C Bourauel; D Drescher
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Comparative evaluation of anchorage loss between self-ligating appliance and Conventional pre-adjusted edgewise appliance using sliding mechanics - A retrospective study.

Authors:  Pankaj Juneja; G Shivaprakash; S S Chopra; P B Kambalyal
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2014-04-03

3.  Friction in a hybrid system. An in vitro study.

Authors:  M Rozzi; M Mucedero; L Franchi; P Cozza
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2011-01-23

4.  Evaluation of friction in orthodontics using various brackets and archwire combinations-an in vitro study.

Authors:  Sujeet Kumar; Shamsher Singh; Rani Hamsa P R; Sameer Ahmed; Apoorva Bhatnagar; Manreet Sidhu; Pramod Shetty
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-05-15

5.  Comparison of frictional resistance between self-ligating and conventional brackets tied with elastomeric and metal ligature in orthodontic archwires.

Authors:  Vanessa Vieira Leite; Murilo Baena Lopes; Alcides Gonini Júnior; Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida; Sandra Kiss Moura; Renato Rodrigues de Almeida
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 May-Jun

6.  Friction behavior of self-ligating and conventional brackets with different ligature systems.

Authors:  Alexandra Szczupakowski; Susanne Reimann; Cornelius Dirk; Ludger Keilig; Anna Weber; Andreas Jäger; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Effect of archwire qualities and bracket designs on the force systems during leveling of malaligned teeth.

Authors:  W Perrey; A Konermann; L Keilig; S Reimann; A Jäger; C Bourauel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 8.  Systematic review on self-ligating vs. conventional brackets: initial pain, number of visits, treatment time.

Authors:  Ales Čelar; Magdalena Schedlberger; Petra Dörfler; Michael Bertl
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  The leveling effectiveness of self-ligating and conventional brackets for complex tooth malalignments.

Authors:  Magali Fansa; Ludger Keilig; Susanne Reimann; Andreas Jäger; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-08-02       Impact factor: 1.938

10.  Comparison of static friction with self-ligating, modified slot design and conventional brackets.

Authors:  Raquel Morais Castro; Perrin Smith Neto; Martinho Campolina Rebello Horta; Matheus Melo Pithon; Dauro Douglas Oliveira
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.