Literature DB >> 19852638

Psychological status of patients referred for orthognathic correction of skeletal II and III discrepancies.

Donald J Burden1, Orlagh Hunt, Chris D Johnston, Michael Stevenson, Ciaran O'Neill, Peter Hepper.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish the extent of psychological problems among patients who require orthognathic treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five aspects of psychological functioning were assessed for 162 patients who required orthognathic treatment and compared with 157 control subjects.
RESULTS: Analysis of variance did not detect any significant difference in the five psychological scores recorded for the skeletal II, skeletal III, and control groups. The proportion of subjects with one or more psychological measure beyond the normal range was 27% for skeletal II subjects, 25% for skeletal III subjects, and 26% for control subjects. One skeletal II subject (1.5%), three skeletal III subjects (3%), and five control subjects (3%) required referral for psychological counseling.
CONCLUSIONS: The orthognathic patients did not differ significantly from the control subjects in their psychological status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19852638      PMCID: PMC8978754          DOI: 10.2319/022709-114.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  14 in total

1.  The influence of mandibular prominence on facial attractiveness.

Authors:  Chris Johnston; Orlagh Hunt; Donald Burden; Mike Stevenson; Peter Hepper
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Class III surgical-orthodontic treatment: a cephalometric study.

Authors:  Chris Johnston; Donald Burden; David Kennedy; Nigel Harradine; Mike Stevenson
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  A cephalometric study of Class II malocclusions treated with mandibular surgery.

Authors:  Donald Burden; Chris Johnston; David Kennedy; Nigel Harradine; Mike Stevenson
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Are orthognathic patients different?

Authors:  S J Cunningham; M S Gilthorpe; N P Hunt
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  A comparison of patients requiring orthognathic treatment who subsequently refused or accepted surgery.

Authors:  J D Kindelan; C E Sheard; R R Nashed
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  1998

6.  The need for orthodontic treatment in the child population of the United Kingdom.

Authors:  D J Burden; A Holmes
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  The psychosocial impact of orthognathic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  O T Hunt; C D Johnston; P G Hepper; D J Burden
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Psychologic implications of orthognathic surgery in patients with skeletal Class II or Class ill malocclusion.

Authors:  Lucia Gerzanic; Reinhold Jagsch; Ingeborg M Watzke
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  2002

9.  Perceptions of recovery and satisfaction in the short term after orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Ceib Phillips; H Asuman Kiyak; Dale Bloomquist; Timothy A Turvey
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Elective orthognathic treatment decision making: a survey of patient reasons and experiences.

Authors:  J Stirling; G Latchford; D O Morris; J Kindelan; R J Spencer; H L Bekker
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2007-06
View more
  8 in total

1.  Psychosocial changes in patients submitted to orthodontic surgery treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Isabela Bittencourt Basso; Flavio Magno Gonçalves; Agnes Andrade Martins; Angela Graciela Deliga Schroder; Karinna Veríssimo Meira Taveira; José Stechman-Neto; Rosane Sampaio Santos; Odilon Guariza-Filho; Cristiano Miranda de Araujo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.606

2.  Effects of sex, age, choice of surgical orthodontic treatment, and skeletal pattern on the psychological assessments of orthodontic patients.

Authors:  Sayaka Hino; Aya Maeda-Iino; Takakazu Yagi; Shoko Nakagawa; Shouichi Miyawaki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  The association between the psychological status and the severity of facial deformity in orthognathic patients.

Authors:  Aleksandra Kovalenko; Anna Slabkovskaya; Nailya Drobysheva; Leonid Persin; Alexey Drobyshev; Marcello Maddalone
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Effect of incisor position on the self-perceived psychosocial impacts of malocclusion among Chinese young adults.

Authors:  Xia Dahong; Cheng Xiangrong; Liu Ying; Liang Yusong; Guo Ying; Sun Yan
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Knowledge, Attitude, and Awareness of Orthognathic Surgery among Orthodontic Patient-Prospective Study.

Authors:  Bhuvaneswari Mani; Muralimani Mani; Selvakumar Ramar; S Srinidhi; S R Bharathi; Tamilselvi Sengodan
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-11-10

6.  Self-perception of dentofacial attractiveness among patients requiring orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Chris Johnston; Orlagh Hunt; Donald Burden; Mike Stevenson; Peter Hepper
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  The structural changes of upper airway and newly developed sleep breathing disorders after surgical treatment in class III malocclusion subjects.

Authors:  Ui Lyong Lee; Hoon Oh; Sang Ki Min; Ji Ho Shin; Yong Seok Kang; Won Wook Lee; Young Eun Han; Young Jun Choi; Hyun Jik Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Complications or rather side effects? Quantification of patient satisfaction and complications after orthognathic surgery-a retrospective, cross-sectional long-term analysis.

Authors:  Daniel G E Thiem; Daniel Schneider; Michael Hammel; Bassam Saka; Bernhard Frerich; Bilal Al-Nawas; Peer W Kämmerer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.573

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.