Literature DB >> 15122555

Perceptions of recovery and satisfaction in the short term after orthognathic surgery.

Ceib Phillips1, H Asuman Kiyak, Dale Bloomquist, Timothy A Turvey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A 2-arm, parallel-group, stratified-block, randomized clinical trial was designed to assess whether patients' perceptions of recovery and satisfaction 4 to 6 weeks after surgery were affected by 3 factors: preparation strategy (viewing a visual treatment simulation), attitudes (expectations about recovery), and psychologic distress (reported before surgery). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred eighty-four patients with a dentofacial disharmony scheduled for orthognathic surgery were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 preparation strategy groups: a standard presurgical consultation with or without a computerized treatment simulation presentation. Psychologic well-being and expectations regarding recovery were obtained before surgery and perceptions of recovery, and satisfaction were assessed for 126 patients at 4 to 6 weeks after surgery.
RESULTS: Viewing a treatment simulation before surgery did not affect patients' perceptions of postsurgical discomfort or satisfaction at 4 to 6 weeks after surgery. Patients who overestimated the discomfort or problems they would experience reported significantly lower average level of problems than those who did not overestimate. Patients who were psychologically distressed before surgery reported, on average, significantly more discomfort or difficulty with symptoms, social/self-concerns, general health, and overall recovery after surgery.
CONCLUSION: Viewing a treatment simulation before surgery does not, on average, negatively affect perception of symptoms or satisfaction 4 to 6 weeks after surgery. Orthognathic surgery patients who are psychologically distressed before surgery tend to report a higher recovery burden overall and, on average, experience more difficulty with symptoms, social/self-concerns, and general health in the first 1 or 2 months after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15122555      PMCID: PMC3593632          DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.08.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  15 in total

1.  Psychological function in orthognathic surgical patients before and after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with rigid and wire fixation.

Authors:  J P Hatch; J D Rugh; R A Bays; J E Van Sickels; S D Keeling; G M Clark
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 2.  Patients' expectations for medical care: an expanded formulation based on review of the literature.

Authors:  R L Kravitz
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.929

3.  Health-related quality of life following orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  J P Hatch; J D Rugh; G M Clark; S D Keeling; B D Tiner; R A Bays
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  1998

4.  Psychosocial predictors of satisfaction among orthognathic surgery patients.

Authors:  A A Scott; J P Hatch; J D Rugh; T J Hoffman; S M Rivera; C Dolce; R A Bays
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  2000

5.  The influence of video imaging on patients' perceptions and expectations.

Authors:  C Phillips; B J Hill; C Cannac
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Psychological factors in orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  J Garvill; H Garvill; K E Kahnberg; S Lundgren
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  Effects of a computerized treatment simulation on patient expectations for orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  C Phillips; L Bailey; H A Kiyak; D Bloomquist
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  2001

8.  Patient-centered outcomes in surgical and orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  C Phillips
Journal:  Semin Orthod       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 0.970

9.  The role of expectations in patients' reports of post-operative outcomes and improvement following therapy.

Authors:  A B Flood; D P Lorence; J Ding; K McPherson; N A Black
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Dentofacial disharmony: psychological status of patients seeking treatment consultation.

Authors:  C Phillips; M E Bennett; H L Broder
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  9 in total

1.  Sensory retraining: burden in daily life related to altered sensation after orthognathic surgery, a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  C Phillips; S H Kim; M Tucker; T A Turvey
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Perception of improvement after orthognathic surgery: the important variables affecting patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Jan Rustemeyer; Ziyad Eke; Andreas Bremerich
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-09

3.  Short-term recovery after orthognathic surgery: a medical daily diary approach.

Authors:  Ceib Phillips; George Blakey
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 4.  Measures of patients' expectations about recovery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shanil Ebrahim; Cindy Malachowski; Mostafa Kamal El Din; Sohail M Mulla; Luis Montoya; Sheena Bance; Jason W Busse
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2015-03

5.  Psychological status of patients referred for orthognathic correction of skeletal II and III discrepancies.

Authors:  Donald J Burden; Orlagh Hunt; Chris D Johnston; Michael Stevenson; Ciaran O'Neill; Peter Hepper
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Changes in cephalometric variables after orthognathic surgery and their relationship to patients' quality of life and satisfaction.

Authors:  Tahereh Baherimoghaddam; Morteza Oshagh; Navid Naseri; Nariman Iraji Nasrbadi; Sepideh Torkan
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2014-12-29

7.  Patient's perception of recovery after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone graft compared with composite grafts: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas Starch-Jensen; Marianne Ahmad; Niels Henrik Bruun; Jonas Peter Becktor
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-10-01

8.  What is the Oral Health-related Quality of Life following Miniscrew-Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (MARPE)? A prospective clinical cohort study.

Authors:  Aldin Kapetanović; René R M Noverraz; Stefan Listl; Stefaan J Bergé; Tong Xi; Jan G J H Schols
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.747

9.  Investigation of Immediate Postoperative Pain following Orthognathic Surgery.

Authors:  Han-Jen Hsu; Kun-Jung Hsu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.