Literature DB >> 19847592

Periprosthetic fractures may be more likely in cementless femoral stems with sharp edges.

K Hu1, X Zhang, J Zhu, C Wang, W Ji, X Bai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many contour designs have been developed to improve the femoral stem in cementless total hip arthroplasty. AIMS: To assess the initial interfacial micromotion and stress distribution.
METHODS: The prosthesis-bone interfacial micromotions and stress distributions of four commonly used femoral stems were assessed by finite element simulation: Alloclassic, Ribbed Anatomic, VerSys, and Secur-Fit. The proximal interfacial micromotions and stress distributions were calculated under the loading conditions of stair climbing. Three-dimensional micromotions were calculated in three proximal sections distal to the osteotomy level with 400 mm between each section. Medial, anterior, lateral and posterior points in each section were selected for calculations.
RESULTS: The micromotions were <100 microm at all the selected points. Significant stress was detected along the sharp corners and ribs of the Alloclassic and Ribbed Anatomic stems, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant stresses are associated with the stems with sharp edges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19847592     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-009-0442-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  19 in total

1.  Quantification of implant micromotion, strain shielding, and bone resorption with porous-coated anatomic medullary locking femoral prostheses.

Authors:  C A Engh; D O'Connor; M Jasty; T F McGovern; J D Bobyn; W H Harris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Cementless titanium tapered-wedge femoral stem: 10- to 15-year follow-up.

Authors:  Amanda D Marshall; Jeffrey G Mokris; Richard D Reitman; Alicia Dandar; David R Mauerhan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  The tapered press fit total hip arthroplasty: a European alternative.

Authors:  Todd V Swanson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Assessment of the fixation stiffness of some femoral stems of different designs.

Authors:  Rina Sakai; Nobue Kanai; Moritoshi Itoman; Kiyoshi Mabuchi
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2006-01-23       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Assessments of different kinds of stems by experiments and FEM analysis: appropriate stress distribution on a hip prosthesis.

Authors:  Rina Sakai; Moritoshi Itoman; Kiyoshi Mabuchi
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Finite element modelling of primary hip stem stability: the effect of interference fit.

Authors:  Mohammed Rafiq Abdul-Kadir; Ulrich Hansen; Ralf Klabunde; Duncan Lucas; Andrew Amis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Cortical bone viscoelasticity and fixation strength of press-fit femoral stems: finite element model.

Authors:  T R Shultz; J D Blaha; T A Gruen; T L Norman
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  The contour of cementless femoral stem has minor effect on initial periprosthetic von Mises stress distribution. A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Kong-Zu Hu; Xian-Long Zhang; Cheng-Tao Wang; Wen-Ting Ji
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.484

9.  The primary stability of a cementless stem varies between subjects as much as between activities.

Authors:  Alberto Pancanti; Marek Bernakiewicz; Marco Viceconti
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Effect of compressive force on the expression of inflammatory cytokines and their receptors in osteoblastic Saos-2 cells.

Authors:  Yuki Koyama; Narihiro Mitsui; Naoto Suzuki; Momoko Yanagisawa; Rina Sanuki; Keitaro Isokawa; Noriyoshi Shimizu; Masao Maeno
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 2.633

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Incidence and predisposing factors of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures: a literature review.

Authors:  Claudia C Sidler-Maier; James P Waddell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Increased risk of intraoperative and early postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture with uncemented stems.

Authors:  Martin Lindberg-Larsen; Christoffer C Jørgensen; Søren Solgaard; Anne G Kjersgaard; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  Comparison of collum femoris-preserving stems and ribbed stems in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mingqing Li; Can Xu; Jie Xie; Yihe Hu; Hua Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.359

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.