Literature DB >> 16532611

Cortical bone viscoelasticity and fixation strength of press-fit femoral stems: finite element model.

T R Shultz1, J D Blaha, T A Gruen, T L Norman.   

Abstract

Many cementless implant designs rely upon a diaphyseal press-fit in conjunction with a porous coated implant surface to achieve primary or short term fixation, thereby constraining interface micromotion to such a level that bone ingrowth and consequent secondary or long-term fixation, i.e., osseointegration, can occur. Bone viscoelasticity, however, has been found to affect stem primary stability by reducing push-out load. In this investigation, an axisymmetric finite element model of a cylindrical stem and diaphyseal cortical bone section was created in order to parametrically evaluate the effect of bone viscoelasticity on stem push-out while controlling coefficient of friction (mu = 0.15, 0.40, and 1.00) and stem-bone diametral interference (delta = 0.01, 0.05, 0.10, and 0.50 mm). Based on results from a previous study, it was hypothesized that stem-bone interference (i.e., press-fit) would elicit a bone viscoelastic response which would reduce the initial fixation of the stem as measured by push-out load. Results indicate that for all examined combinations of mu and delta, bone viscoelastic behavior reduced the push-out load by a range of 2.6-82.6% due to stress relaxation of the bone. It was found that the push-out load increased with mu for each value of delta, but minimal increases in the push-out load (2.9-4.9%) were observed as delta was increased beyond 0.10 mm. Within the range of variables reported for this study, it was concluded that bone viscoelastic behavior, namely stress relaxation, has an asymptotic affect on stem contact pressure, which reduces stem push-out load. It was also found that higher levels of coefficient of friction are beneficial to primary fixation, and that an interference "threshold" exists beyond which no additional gains in push-out load are achieved.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16532611     DOI: 10.1115/1.2133765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  6 in total

1.  Periprosthetic fractures may be more likely in cementless femoral stems with sharp edges.

Authors:  K Hu; X Zhang; J Zhu; C Wang; W Ji; X Bai
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  Biomechanical behaviours of the bone-implant interface: a review.

Authors:  Xing Gao; Manon Fraulob; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Acetabular revision arthroplasty using trabecular titanium implants.

Authors:  Boris Steno; Milan Kokavec; Libor Necas
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Biomechanics of the press-fit phenomenon in dental implantology: an image-based finite element analysis.

Authors:  Gianni Frisardi; Sandro Barone; Armando V Razionale; Alessandro Paoli; Flavio Frisardi; Antonio Tullio; Aurea Lumbau; Giacomo Chessa
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 2.151

5.  Comparison of early migration patterns between a ceramic and polyethylene liner in uncemented Trabecular Titanium cups: a 2-year randomized controlled trial of 52 hips using radiostereometric analysis.

Authors:  Amanda D Klaassen; Elisabeth A Schäffer; Nienke W Willigenburg; Loes W A H Van Beers; Vanessa A B Scholtes; Victor P M Van der Hulst; Lennard A Koster; Bart L Kaptein; Dirk Jan F Moojen; Rudolf W Poolman
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.925

6.  Radiolucencies surrounding acetabular components with three-dimensional coatings: artifact or real?

Authors:  Ahmad Faizan; Philip Chuang; Carlos Aponte; Vincent Moretti; Peter F Sharkey
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2017-07-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.