Literature DB >> 19845371

Quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of rat acute toxicity by oral exposure.

Hao Zhu1, Todd M Martin, Lin Ye, Alexander Sedykh, Douglas M Young, Alexander Tropsha.   

Abstract

Few quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) studies have successfully modeled large, diverse rodent toxicity end points. In this study, a comprehensive data set of 7385 compounds with their most conservative lethal dose (LD(50)) values has been compiled. A combinatorial QSAR approach has been employed to develop robust and predictive models of acute toxicity in rats caused by oral exposure to chemicals. To enable fair comparison between the predictive power of models generated in this study versus a commercial toxicity predictor, TOPKAT (Toxicity Prediction by Komputer Assisted Technology), a modeling subset of the entire data set was selected that included all 3472 compounds used in TOPKAT's training set. The remaining 3913 compounds, which were not present in the TOPKAT training set, were used as the external validation set. QSAR models of five different types were developed for the modeling set. The prediction accuracy for the external validation set was estimated by determination coefficient R(2) of linear regression between actual and predicted LD(50) values. The use of the applicability domain threshold implemented in most models generally improved the external prediction accuracy but expectedly led to the decrease in chemical space coverage; depending on the applicability domain threshold, R(2) ranged from 0.24 to 0.70. Ultimately, several consensus models were developed by averaging the predicted LD(50) for every compound using all five models. The consensus models afforded higher prediction accuracy for the external validation data set with the higher coverage as compared to individual constituent models. The validated consensus LD(50) models developed in this study can be used as reliable computational predictors of in vivo acute toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19845371      PMCID: PMC2796713          DOI: 10.1021/tx900189p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol        ISSN: 0893-228X            Impact factor:   3.739


  24 in total

1.  Novel variable selection quantitative structure--property relationship approach based on the k-nearest-neighbor principle

Authors: 
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2000-01

2.  Rational selection of training and test sets for the development of validated QSAR models.

Authors:  Alexander Golbraikh; Min Shen; Zhiyan Xiao; Yun-De Xiao; Kuo-Hsiung Lee; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2003 Feb-Apr       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Current status of methods for defining the applicability domain of (quantitative) structure-activity relationships. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 52.

Authors:  Tatiana I Netzeva; Andrew Worth; Tom Aldenberg; Romualdo Benigni; Mark T D Cronin; Paolo Gramatica; Joanna S Jaworska; Scott Kahn; Gilles Klopman; Carol A Marchant; Glenn Myatt; Nina Nikolova-Jeliazkova; Grace Y Patlewicz; Roger Perkins; David Roberts; Terry Schultz; David W Stanton; Johannes J M van de Sandt; Weida Tong; Gilman Veith; Chihae Yang
Journal:  Altern Lab Anim       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.303

Review 4.  Can we estimate the accuracy of ADME-Tox predictions?

Authors:  Igor V Tetko; Pierre Bruneau; Hans-Werner Mewes; Douglas C Rohrer; Gennadiy I Poda
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 5.  The expanding role of predictive toxicology: an update on the (Q)SAR models for mutagens and carcinogens.

Authors:  Romualdo Benigni; Tatiana I Netzeva; Emilio Benfenati; Cecilia Bossa; Rainer Franke; Christoph Helma; Etje Hulzebos; Carol Marchant; Ann Richard; Yin-Tak Woo; Chihae Yang
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Combinatorial QSAR modeling of chemical toxicants tested against Tetrahymena pyriformis.

Authors:  Hao Zhu; Alexander Tropsha; Denis Fourches; Alexandre Varnek; Ester Papa; Paola Gramatica; Tomas Oberg; Phuong Dao; Artem Cherkasov; Igor V Tetko
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  A predictive model for estimating rat oral LD50 values.

Authors:  K Enslein; T R Lander; M E Tomb; P N Craig
Journal:  Toxicol Ind Health       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.273

8.  A toxicity estimation model.

Authors:  K Enslein
Journal:  J Environ Pathol Toxicol       Date:  1978 Sep-Oct

9.  Structure-activity relationships for rat and mouse LD50 of miscellaneous alcohols.

Authors:  G Wang; N Bai
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.086

10.  Critical assessment of QSAR models of environmental toxicity against Tetrahymena pyriformis: focusing on applicability domain and overfitting by variable selection.

Authors:  Igor V Tetko; Iurii Sushko; Anil Kumar Pandey; Hao Zhu; Alexander Tropsha; Ester Papa; Tomas Oberg; Roberto Todeschini; Denis Fourches; Alexandre Varnek
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 4.956

View more
  35 in total

1.  Medicinal chemistry for 2020.

Authors:  Seetharama D Satyanarayanajois; Ronald A Hill
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.808

2.  Prediction of pesticide acute toxicity using two-dimensional chemical descriptors and target species classification.

Authors:  T M Martin; C R Lilavois; M G Barron
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 3.  Advancing computer-aided drug discovery (CADD) by big data and data-driven machine learning modeling.

Authors:  Linlin Zhao; Heather L Ciallella; Lauren M Aleksunes; Hao Zhu
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 7.851

4.  Transitioning the Generalised Read-Across approach (GenRA) to quantitative predictions: A case study using acute oral toxicity data.

Authors:  George Helman; Imran Shah; Grace Patlewicz
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2019-11-01

5.  Design, synthesis and experimental validation of novel potential chemopreventive agents using random forest and support vector machine binary classifiers.

Authors:  Brienne Sprague; Qian Shi; Marlene T Kim; Liying Zhang; Alexander Sedykh; Eiichiro Ichiishi; Harukuni Tokuda; Kuo-Hsiung Lee; Hao Zhu
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Predicting Nano-Bio Interactions by Integrating Nanoparticle Libraries and Quantitative Nanostructure Activity Relationship Modeling.

Authors:  Wenyi Wang; Alexander Sedykh; Hainan Sun; Linlin Zhao; Daniel P Russo; Hongyu Zhou; Bing Yan; Hao Zhu
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 15.881

7.  THE INTERACTIVE DECISION COMMITTEE FOR CHEMICAL TOXICITY ANALYSIS.

Authors:  Chaeryon Kang; Hao Zhu; Fred A Wright; Fei Zou; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  J Stat Res       Date:  2012

8.  CATMoS: Collaborative Acute Toxicity Modeling Suite.

Authors:  Kamel Mansouri; Agnes L Karmaus; Jeremy Fitzpatrick; Grace Patlewicz; Prachi Pradeep; Domenico Alberga; Nathalie Alepee; Timothy E H Allen; Dave Allen; Vinicius M Alves; Carolina H Andrade; Tyler R Auernhammer; Davide Ballabio; Shannon Bell; Emilio Benfenati; Sudin Bhattacharya; Joyce V Bastos; Stephen Boyd; J B Brown; Stephen J Capuzzi; Yaroslav Chushak; Heather Ciallella; Alex M Clark; Viviana Consonni; Pankaj R Daga; Sean Ekins; Sherif Farag; Maxim Fedorov; Denis Fourches; Domenico Gadaleta; Feng Gao; Jeffery M Gearhart; Garett Goh; Jonathan M Goodman; Francesca Grisoni; Christopher M Grulke; Thomas Hartung; Matthew Hirn; Pavel Karpov; Alexandru Korotcov; Giovanna J Lavado; Michael Lawless; Xinhao Li; Thomas Luechtefeld; Filippo Lunghini; Giuseppe F Mangiatordi; Gilles Marcou; Dan Marsh; Todd Martin; Andrea Mauri; Eugene N Muratov; Glenn J Myatt; Dac-Trung Nguyen; Orazio Nicolotti; Reine Note; Paritosh Pande; Amanda K Parks; Tyler Peryea; Ahsan H Polash; Robert Rallo; Alessandra Roncaglioni; Craig Rowlands; Patricia Ruiz; Daniel P Russo; Ahmed Sayed; Risa Sayre; Timothy Sheils; Charles Siegel; Arthur C Silva; Anton Simeonov; Sergey Sosnin; Noel Southall; Judy Strickland; Yun Tang; Brian Teppen; Igor V Tetko; Dennis Thomas; Valery Tkachenko; Roberto Todeschini; Cosimo Toma; Ignacio Tripodi; Daniela Trisciuzzi; Alexander Tropsha; Alexandre Varnek; Kristijan Vukovic; Zhongyu Wang; Liguo Wang; Katrina M Waters; Andrew J Wedlake; Sanjeeva J Wijeyesakere; Dan Wilson; Zijun Xiao; Hongbin Yang; Gergely Zahoranszky-Kohalmi; Alexey V Zakharov; Fagen F Zhang; Zhen Zhang; Tongan Zhao; Hao Zhu; Kimberley M Zorn; Warren Casey; Nicole C Kleinstreuer
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Predicting chemical ocular toxicity using a combinatorial QSAR approach.

Authors:  Renee Solimeo; Jun Zhang; Marlene Kim; Alexander Sedykh; Hao Zhu
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.739

10.  Predictive Modeling of Estrogen Receptor Binding Agents Using Advanced Cheminformatics Tools and Massive Public Data.

Authors:  Kathryn Ribay; Marlene T Kim; Wenyi Wang; Daniel Pinolini; Hao Zhu
Journal:  Front Environ Sci       Date:  2016-03-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.