Literature DB >> 28703021

Prediction of pesticide acute toxicity using two-dimensional chemical descriptors and target species classification.

T M Martin1, C R Lilavois2, M G Barron2.   

Abstract

Previous modelling of the median lethal dose (oral rat LD50) has indicated that local class-based models yield better correlations than global models. We evaluated the hypothesis that dividing the dataset by pesticidal mechanisms would improve prediction accuracy. A linear discriminant analysis (LDA) based-approach was utilized to assign indicators such as the pesticide target species, mode of action, or target species - mode of action combination. LDA models were able to predict these indicators with about 87% accuracy. Toxicity is predicted utilizing the QSAR model fit to chemicals with that indicator. Toxicity was also predicted using a global hierarchical clustering (HC) approach which divides data set into clusters based on molecular similarity. At a comparable prediction coverage (~94%), the global HC method yielded slightly higher prediction accuracy (r2 = 0.50) than the LDA method (r2 ~ 0.47). A single model fit to the entire training set yielded the poorest results (r2 = 0.38), indicating that there is an advantage to clustering the dataset to predict acute toxicity. Finally, this study shows that whilst dividing the training set into subsets (i.e. clusters) improves prediction accuracy, it may not matter which method (expert based or purely machine learning) is used to divide the dataset into subsets.

Entities:  

Keywords:  QSAR; chemical descriptors; mode of action; pesticides; rodent toxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28703021      PMCID: PMC5796665          DOI: 10.1080/1062936X.2017.1343204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res        ISSN: 1026-776X            Impact factor:   3.000


  11 in total

1.  Stepwise discrimination between four modes of toxic action of phenols in the Tetrahymena pyriformis assay.

Authors:  Gerrit Schüürmann; Aynur O Aptula; Ralph Kühne; Ralf-Uwe Ebert
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.739

2.  Estimation of reliability of predictions and model applicability domain evaluation in the analysis of acute toxicity (LD50).

Authors:  A Sazonovas; P Japertas; R Didziapetris
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  A hierarchical clustering methodology for the estimation of toxicity.

Authors:  Todd M Martin; Paul Harten; Raghuraman Venkatapathy; Shashikala Das; Douglas M Young
Journal:  Toxicol Mech Methods       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.987

4.  Comparison of in silico tools for evaluating rat oral acute toxicity.

Authors:  R G Diaza; S Manganelli; A Esposito; A Roncaglioni; A Manganaro; E Benfenati
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Comparison of global and mode of action-based models for aquatic toxicity.

Authors:  T M Martin; D M Young; C R Lilavois; M G Barron
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  An overview of structure-activity relationships as an alternative to testing in animals for carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, dermal and eye irritation, and acute oral toxicity.

Authors:  K Enslein
Journal:  Toxicol Ind Health       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.273

7.  QSAR Modelling of Rat Acute Toxicity on the Basis of PASS Prediction.

Authors:  Alexey Lagunin; Alexey Zakharov; Dmitry Filimonov; Vladimir Poroikov
Journal:  Mol Inform       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.353

8.  Prediction of aquatic toxicity mode of action using linear discriminant and random forest models.

Authors:  Todd M Martin; Christopher M Grulke; Douglas M Young; Christine L Russom; Nina Y Wang; Crystal R Jackson; Mace G Barron
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of rat acute toxicity by oral exposure.

Authors:  Hao Zhu; Todd M Martin; Lin Ye; Alexander Sedykh; Douglas M Young; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.739

10.  Testing Chemical Safety: What Is Needed to Ensure the Widespread Application of Non-animal Approaches?

Authors:  Natalie Burden; Fiona Sewell; Kathryn Chapman
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  4 in total

1.  MOA-based linear and nonlinear QSAR models for predicting the toxicity of organic chemicals to Vibrio fischeri.

Authors:  Shengnan Zhang; Ning Wang; Limin Su; Xiaoyan Xu; Chao Li; Weichao Qin; Yuanhui Zhao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Unsupervised Algorithms for Microarray Sample Stratification.

Authors:  Michele Fratello; Luca Cattelani; Antonio Federico; Alisa Pavel; Giovanni Scala; Angela Serra; Dario Greco
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

3.  Subjective Symptoms of Male Workers Linked to Occupational Pesticide Exposure on Coffee Plantations in the Jarabacoa Region, Dominican Republic.

Authors:  Hans-Peter Hutter; Michael Kundi; Kathrin Lemmerer; Michael Poteser; Lisbeth Weitensfelder; Peter Wallner; Hanns Moshammer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Machine Learning Based Toxicity Prediction: From Chemical Structural Description to Transcriptome Analysis.

Authors:  Yunyi Wu; Guanyu Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.