Literature DB >> 18311912

Combinatorial QSAR modeling of chemical toxicants tested against Tetrahymena pyriformis.

Hao Zhu1, Alexander Tropsha, Denis Fourches, Alexandre Varnek, Ester Papa, Paola Gramatica, Tomas Oberg, Phuong Dao, Artem Cherkasov, Igor V Tetko.   

Abstract

Selecting most rigorous quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) approaches is of great importance in the development of robust and predictive models of chemical toxicity. To address this issue in a systematic way, we have formed an international virtual collaboratory consisting of six independent groups with shared interests in computational chemical toxicology. We have compiled an aqueous toxicity data set containing 983 unique compounds tested in the same laboratory over a decade against Tetrahymena pyriformis. A modeling set including 644 compounds was selected randomly from the original set and distributed to all groups that used their own QSAR tools for model development. The remaining 339 compounds in the original set (external set I) as well as 110 additional compounds (external set II) published recently by the same laboratory (after this computational study was already in progress) were used as two independent validation sets to assess the external predictive power of individual models. In total, our virtual collaboratory has developed 15 different types of QSAR models of aquatic toxicity for the training set. The internal prediction accuracy for the modeling set ranged from 0.76 to 0.93 as measured by the leave-one-out cross-validation correlation coefficient ( Q abs2). The prediction accuracy for the external validation sets I and II ranged from 0.71 to 0.85 (linear regression coefficient R absI2) and from 0.38 to 0.83 (linear regression coefficient R absII2), respectively. The use of an applicability domain threshold implemented in most models generally improved the external prediction accuracy but at the same time led to a decrease in chemical space coverage. Finally, several consensus models were developed by averaging the predicted aquatic toxicity for every compound using all 15 models, with or without taking into account their respective applicability domains. We find that consensus models afford higher prediction accuracy for the external validation data sets with the highest space coverage as compared to individual constituent models. Our studies prove the power of a collaborative and consensual approach to QSAR model development. The best validated models of aquatic toxicity developed by our collaboratory (both individual and consensus) can be used as reliable computational predictors of aquatic toxicity and are available from any of the participating laboratories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18311912     DOI: 10.1021/ci700443v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  62 in total

1.  Chemical space: missing pieces in cheminformatics.

Authors:  Sean Ekins; Rishi R Gupta; Eric Gifford; Barry A Bunin; Chris L Waller
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Modeling kinetics of subcellular disposition of chemicals.

Authors:  Stefan Balaz
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  A turning point for blood-brain barrier modeling.

Authors:  Sean Ekins; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  QSAR modeling: where have you been? Where are you going to?

Authors:  Artem Cherkasov; Eugene N Muratov; Denis Fourches; Alexandre Varnek; Igor I Baskin; Mark Cronin; John Dearden; Paola Gramatica; Yvonne C Martin; Roberto Todeschini; Viviana Consonni; Victor E Kuz'min; Richard Cramer; Romualdo Benigni; Chihae Yang; James Rathman; Lothar Terfloth; Johann Gasteiger; Ann Richard; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Chembench: A Publicly Accessible, Integrated Cheminformatics Portal.

Authors:  Stephen J Capuzzi; Ian Sang-June Kim; Wai In Lam; Thomas E Thornton; Eugene N Muratov; Diane Pozefsky; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  QSAR modeling of the blood-brain barrier permeability for diverse organic compounds.

Authors:  Liying Zhang; Hao Zhu; Tudor I Oprea; Alexander Golbraikh; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  QSAR analysis of the toxicity of nitroaromatics in Tetrahymena pyriformis: structural factors and possible modes of action.

Authors:  A G Artemenko; E N Muratov; V E Kuz'min; N N Muratov; E V Varlamova; A V Kuz'mina; L G Gorb; A Golius; F C Hill; J Leszczynski; A Tropsha
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.000

8.  Tuning HERG out: antitarget QSAR models for drug development.

Authors:  Rodolpho C Braga; Vinicius M Alves; Meryck F B Silva; Eugene Muratov; Denis Fourches; Alexander Tropsha; Carolina H Andrade
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Discovery of novel antimalarial compounds enabled by QSAR-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Liying Zhang; Denis Fourches; Alexander Sedykh; Hao Zhu; Alexander Golbraikh; Sean Ekins; Julie Clark; Michele C Connelly; Martina Sigal; Dena Hodges; Armand Guiguemde; R Kiplin Guy; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.

Authors:  Denis Fourches; Julie C Barnes; Nicola C Day; Paul Bradley; Jane Z Reed; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.