| Literature DB >> 19842066 |
Lobna Elleuch1, Mohamed Shaaban, Slim Smaoui, Lotfi Mellouli, Ines Karray-Rebai, Lilia Fourati-Ben Fguira, Khaled A Shaaban, Hartmut Laatsch.
Abstract
During our search for Streptomyces spp. as new producers of bioactive secondary metabolites, the ethyl acetate extract of the new terrestrial Streptomyces isolate TN262 delivered eight antimicrobially active compounds. They were identified as 1-acetyl-beta-carboline (1), tryptophol (2), cineromycin B (3), 2,3-dihydrocineromycin B (4), cyclo-(tyrosylprolyl) (5), 3-(hydroxyacetyl)-indole (6), brevianamide F (7), and cis-cyclo-(L-prolyl-L-leucyl) (8). Three further metabolites were detected in the unpolar fractions using GC-MS and tentatively assigned as benzophenone (9), N-butyl-benzenesulfonamide (10), and hexanedioic acid-bis-(2-ethylhexyl) ester (11). This last compound is known as plasticizer derivatives, but it has never been described from natural sources. In this article, we describe the identification of the new Streptomyces sp. isolate TN262 using its cultural characteristics, the nucleotide sequence of the corresponding 16S rRNA gene and the phylogenetic analysis, followed by optimization, large-scale fermentation, isolation of the bioactive constituents, and determination of their structures. The biological activity of compounds (2), (3), (4), and those of the unpolar fractions was addressed as well.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19842066 PMCID: PMC3128704 DOI: 10.1007/s12010-009-8808-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Biochem Biotechnol ISSN: 0273-2289 Impact factor: 2.926
13C and 1H NMR data (CDCl3, J in Hz) of Cineromycin B (3), compared with literature values.
| No. | Cineromycin B ( | Cineromycin B ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 166.1 | – | 166.3 | – |
| 2 | 115.1 | 5.87 (d, 15.5) | 115.0 | 5.86 (d, 16) |
| 3 | 155.2 | 6.93 (d, 15.5) | 155.5 | 6.91 (d, 16) |
| 4 | 73.4 | – | 73.4 | – |
| 5 | 135.2 | 5.87 (d, 15.5) | 135.3 | 5.85 (d, 16) |
| 6 | 133.6 | 5.73 (dd, 16.3, 4.8) | 133.6 | 5.71 (dd, 16, 5) |
| 7 | 74.6 | 4.55 (m) | 74.5 | 4.53 (d, 5) |
| 8 | 137.9 | – | 137.9 | – |
| 9 | 129.5 | 5.23 (m) | 129.4 | 5.21 (brm) |
| 10 | 25.1 | 2.10 (m), 1.80 (m) | 25.0 | 2.10 (brm), 1.84 (d, 16.5) |
| 11 | 34.8 | 1.21 (m), 1.16(m) | 34.3 | 1.22 (m), 1.17 (m) |
| 12 | 39.5 | 1.25 (m) | 39.5 | 1.40 (brq, 6) |
| 13 | 75.5 | 4.55 (m) | 75.6 | 4.55 (d, 7) |
| CH3-4 | 27.1 | 1.55 (s) | 27.0 | 1.53 (s) |
| CH3-8 | 15.0 | 1.73 (s) | 15.0 | 1.71 (s) |
| CH3-12 | 16.1 | 0.89 (d, 6.6) | 16.1 | 0.88 (d, 6) |
| CH3-13 | 18.2 | 1.22 (d, 6.3) | 18.1 | 1.21 (d, 7) |
Fig. 1Antimicrobial activities of TN262 strain in solid media against M. luteus LB 14110 (A1), E. coli ATCC 8739 (A2), and Fusarium sp. (A3), and in liquid media against: M. luteus LB 14110 (B1), S. aureus ATCC 6538 (B2), E. coli ATCC 8739 (B3), S. enterica ATCC43972 (B4), and Fusarium sp. (B5)
Cultural characteristics of TN262 strain.
| Medium | Growth | Vegetative mycelia | Aerial mycelia | Spores |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nutrient agar | Well, spreading | Abundant, yellowish | Abundant, grayish | Moderate, grayish-yellow |
| Sabouraud agar | Weak | Weak, yellowish | Weak, yellowish | Weak, elevated, yellowish |
| Yeast malt agar | Moderate | Detachable, yellowish | Moderate, grayish-brown | Moderate, brown |
Fig. 2Phylogenetic tree of the Streptomyces sp. isolate TN262 strain
Fig. 3Effect of glycerol concentration on the growth, productivity, and antimicrobial activity of Streptomyces sp TN262 extract against: M.luteus LB 14110 (a); E.coli ATCC 8739 (b); and Fusarium sp. (c)
GC–MS analysis of the combined unpolar fractions I and II.
| Name | Relative abundance (%) | M. F. | M.Wt. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benzophenone ( | 16.67 | 17.2 | C13H10O | 182 |
| 18.32 | 60.2 | C10H15 NO2S | 213 | |
| Hexanedioic acid-bis(2-ethylhexyl)ester ( | 23.84 | 100 | C22H42O4 | 370 |
Fig. 4HMBC (right arrow), and H,H COSY (thick line, left–right arrow) connectivities of Cineromycin B (3)
Fig. 5Structural formulas of compounds 1–11
The antimicrobial activity of the unpolar fractions (UnF) and the isolated compounds 2, 3 and 4.
| Compound | Test microorganism (inhibition zones (mm)) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UnF (20 µg/disk) | – | – | – | – | – |
| UnF (30 µg/disk) | – | – | – | – | – |
| UnF (40 µg/disk) | 15 | 16 | 15 | – | – |
| UnF (50 µg/disk) | 18 | 20 | 17 | – | – |
| 12 | 19 | 17 | – | 12 | |
| – | 13 | 12 | – | – | |
For each concentration and indicator microorganism, the experiment was carried out simultaneously three times under same conditions. The obtained diameters of inhibition zones were quite similar and the reported inhibition zones (mm) are the average of the three experiments
ND activity not detected