BACKGROUND, AIM, AND SCOPE: Olive oil mill wastewater (OOMW) environmental impacts minimization have been attempted by developing more effective processes, but no chemical or biological treatments were found to be totally effective to mitigate their impact on receiving systems. This work is the first that reports simultaneously the efficiency of three different approaches: biological treatment by two fungal species (Trametes versicolor or Pleurotus sajor caju), enzymatic treatment by laccase, and chemical treatment by photo-Fenton oxidation on phenols removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Those treatments were performed on OOMW with or without phenol supplement (p-coumaric, vanillin, guaiacol, vanillic acid, or tyrosol). OOMW samples resulted from treatments were extracted for phenols using liquid-liquid extraction and analyzed by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Treatment with T. versicolor or P. sajor caju were able to remove between 22% and 74% and between 8% and 76% of phenols, respectively. Treatment by laccase was able to reduce 4% to 70% of phenols whereas treatment by photo-Fenton oxidation was responsible for 100% phenols reduction. DISCUSSION: Range of phenol degradation was equivalent between T. versicolor, P. sajor caju and laccase for p-coumaric, guaiacol, caffeic acid, and tyrosol in supplemented OOMW, which enhances this enzyme role in the biological treatment promoted by these two species. CONCLUSIONS: Phenols were removed more efficiently by photo-Fenton treatment than by biological or enzymatic treatments. RECOMMENDATIONS AND PERSPECTIVES: Use of fungi, laccase, or photo-Fenton presents great potential for removing phenols from OOMW. This should be further assessed by increasing the application scale and the reactor configurations effect on the performance, besides a toxicity evaluation of treated wastewater in comparison to raw wastewater.
BACKGROUND, AIM, AND SCOPE: Olive oil mill wastewater (OOMW) environmental impacts minimization have been attempted by developing more effective processes, but no chemical or biological treatments were found to be totally effective to mitigate their impact on receiving systems. This work is the first that reports simultaneously the efficiency of three different approaches: biological treatment by two fungal species (Trametes versicolor or Pleurotus sajor caju), enzymatic treatment by laccase, and chemical treatment by photo-Fenton oxidation on phenols removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Those treatments were performed on OOMW with or without phenol supplement (p-coumaric, vanillin, guaiacol, vanillic acid, or tyrosol). OOMW samples resulted from treatments were extracted for phenols using liquid-liquid extraction and analyzed by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Treatment with T. versicolor or P. sajor caju were able to remove between 22% and 74% and between 8% and 76% of phenols, respectively. Treatment by laccase was able to reduce 4% to 70% of phenols whereas treatment by photo-Fenton oxidation was responsible for 100% phenols reduction. DISCUSSION: Range of phenol degradation was equivalent between T. versicolor, P. sajor caju and laccase for p-coumaric, guaiacol, caffeic acid, and tyrosol in supplemented OOMW, which enhances this enzyme role in the biological treatment promoted by these two species. CONCLUSIONS:Phenols were removed more efficiently by photo-Fenton treatment than by biological or enzymatic treatments. RECOMMENDATIONS AND PERSPECTIVES: Use of fungi, laccase, or photo-Fenton presents great potential for removing phenols from OOMW. This should be further assessed by increasing the application scale and the reactor configurations effect on the performance, besides a toxicity evaluation of treated wastewater in comparison to raw wastewater.
Authors: R Pereira; S C Antunes; A M M Gonçalves; S M Marques; F Gonçalves; F Ferreira; A C Freitas; T A P Rocha-Santos; M S Diniz; L Castro; I Peres; A C Duarte Journal: Water Res Date: 2009-03-18 Impact factor: 11.236
Authors: G Aggelis; D Iconomou; M Christou; D Bokas; S Kotzailias; G Christou; V Tsagou; S Papanikolaou Journal: Water Res Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 11.236
Authors: S Karthikeyan; M Ezhil Priya; R Boopathy; M Velan; A B Mandal; G Sekaran Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2011-12-30 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Celine I L Justino; Ruth Pereira; Ana C Freitas; Teresa A P Rocha-Santos; Teresa S L Panteleitchouk; Armando C Duarte Journal: Ecotoxicology Date: 2011-11-01 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Lemya Djeffal; Sihem Abderrahmane; Mourad Benzina; Marc Fourmentin; Stéphane Siffert; Sophie Fourmentin Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 4.223