Literature DB >> 15148787

[Usefulness of Cho/Cr ratio in proton MR spectroscopy for differentiating residual/recurrent glioma from non-neoplastic lesions].

Kumiko Ando1, Reiichi Ishikura, Yuki Nagami, Tsutomu Morikawa, Yoshihiro Takada, Jota Ikeda, Norio Nakao, Tsuyoshi Matsumoto, Norio Arita.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the clinical usefulness of the Cho/Cr ratio of proton MR spectroscopy(1H-MRS) to differentiate residual/recurrent glioma from non-neoplastic lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 20 cases of glioma were involved in this study(astrocytoma grade I-II: 7, oligodendroglioma: 1, astrocytoma grade III: 2, glioblastoma: 10). Seven of the patients underwent surgical resection only, 4 underwent surgical resection and radiotherapy(40-60 Gy), and 9 underwent surgical resection and radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy(14-60 Gy). 1H-MRS was performed on a 1.5 Tesla clinical MR unit using a 3D-chemical shift imaging sequence(1500 msec/270 msec/1 (TR/TE/excitations), and the Cho/Cr ratio was calculated in the voxel where neoplastic lesion was most suspected on MRI. The presence of lactate + lipid peak was also evaluated. All spectra were obtained after the contrast enhanced study.
RESULTS: Cho/Cr ratios were significantly higher in cases of residual/recurrent tumors(mean +/- SD = 1.70 +/- 0.96) than in non-neoplastic lesions(mean +/- SD = 1.04 +/- 1.16) (Mann-Whitney U-test p = 0.047). If a Cho/Cr ratio of more than 1.5 was used as a marker of tumor presence, its sensitivity was 64%, specificity 83%, and accuracy 70%. One false-positive case that of radiation necrosis whose spectrum showed a high Cho/Cr ratio with markedly elevated lactate + lipid peak.
CONCLUSION: The Cho/Cr ratio of 1H-MRS provides additional information to MRI in differentiating residual/recurrent gliomas from non-neoplastic lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15148787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi        ISSN: 0048-0428


  15 in total

Review 1.  A systematic literature review of magnetic resonance spectroscopy for the characterization of brain tumors.

Authors:  W Hollingworth; L S Medina; R E Lenkinski; D K Shibata; B Bernal; D Zurakowski; B Comstock; J G Jarvik
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Update on brain tumor imaging: from anatomy to physiology.

Authors:  S Cha
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Differentiating tumor recurrence from treatment necrosis: a review of neuro-oncologic imaging strategies.

Authors:  Nishant Verma; Matthew C Cowperthwaite; Mark G Burnett; Mia K Markey
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Glioma residual or recurrence versus radiation necrosis: accuracy of pentavalent technetium-99m-dimercaptosuccinic acid [Tc-99m (V) DMSA] brain SPECT compared to proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS): initial results.

Authors:  Amr Amin; Hosna Moustafa; Ebaa Ahmed; Mohamed El-Toukhy
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Distinction between glioma progression and post-radiation change by combined physiologic MR imaging.

Authors:  Eiji Matsusue; James R Fink; Jason K Rockhill; Toshihide Ogawa; Kenneth R Maravilla
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 6.  Glioma recurrence versus radiation necrosis: accuracy of current imaging modalities.

Authors:  George A Alexiou; Spyridon Tsiouris; Athanasios P Kyritsis; Spyridon Voulgaris; Maria I Argyropoulou; Andreas D Fotopoulos
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  NCI-sponsored trial for the evaluation of safety and preliminary efficacy of 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine (FLT) as a marker of proliferation in patients with recurrent gliomas: preliminary efficacy studies.

Authors:  Alexander M Spence; Mark Muzi; Jeanne M Link; Finbarr O'Sullivan; Janet F Eary; John M Hoffman; Lalitha K Shankar; Kenneth A Krohn
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  MR imaging of late radiation therapy- and chemotherapy-induced injury: a pictorial essay.

Authors:  L Pruzincová; J Steno; M Srbecký; P Kalina; B Rychlý; E Boljesíková; M Chorváth; M Novotný; V Procka; I Makaiová; V Belan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  The role of imaging in the management of progressive glioblastoma : a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Timothy Charles Ryken; Nafi Aygun; Johnathan Morris; Marin Schweizer; Rajeshwari Nair; Cassandra Spracklen; Steven N Kalkanis; Jeffrey J Olson
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 10.  Modern brain tumor imaging.

Authors:  Marc C Mabray; Ramon F Barajas; Soonmee Cha
Journal:  Brain Tumor Res Treat       Date:  2015-04-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.