Literature DB >> 19823901

Lymph node harvest in colon cancer: influence of microsatellite instability and proximal tumor location.

Kjetil Søreide1, Bjørn Steinar Nedrebø, Jon Arne Søreide, Aida Slewa, Hartwig Kørner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: At least 12 harvested lymph nodes are recommended for proper staging of colon cancer. The effect of tumor-related factors associated with lymph node harvest is not well understood as data are lacking. We investigated tumor-related factors in relation to the number of lymph nodes harvested.
METHODS: Patient and tumor characteristics were investigated in relation to harvested lymph nodes (LN >or= 12), number of metastatic nodes, LN ratio (LNR), and prognosis with univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: An LN harvest >or=12 nodes was achieved in 36% of the patients. Having <12 nodes harvested was not associated with increased risk for locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, or decreased survival. Tumor size >5 cm, microsatellite instability (MSI), and proximal tumor location predicted a harvest of LN >or= 12. The highest rate (54%) of LN >or= 12 was found for MSI cancers [odds ratio (OR) 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-6.5; P = 0.011]. Multivariate analysis identified a proximal location as an independent factor of LN >or= 12 (adjusted OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.5-8.2; P = 0.003), with MSI an independent factor in stage II to III colon cancer (adjusted OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1-6.0; P = 0.026). To determine the best prognosticator, LNR was the only significant factor in the multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazards) with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.9 (95% CI 1.1-7.8; P = 0.038) for LNR 0.01-0.17 and an HR of 5.8 (95% CI 2.5-13.1; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Proximal tumor location and microsatellite instability are associated with a higher number of lymph nodes harvested, pointing to possible underlying genetic and immunologic mechanisms. The LNR is an independent prognostic variable for colon cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19823901     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0255-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  46 in total

1.  Effector memory T cells, early metastasis, and survival in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Franck Pagès; Anne Berger; Matthieu Camus; Fatima Sanchez-Cabo; Anne Costes; Robert Molidor; Bernhard Mlecnik; Amos Kirilovsky; Malin Nilsson; Diane Damotte; Tchao Meatchi; Patrick Bruneval; Paul-Henri Cugnenc; Zlatko Trajanoski; Wolf-Herman Fridman; Jérôme Galon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A national study on lymph node retrieval in resectional surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Paris P Tekkis; Jason J Smith; Alexander G Heriot; Ara W Darzi; Michael R Thompson; Jeffrey D Stamatakis
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Impact of preoperative radiation for rectal cancer on subsequent lymph node evaluation: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Arden M Morris; David A Rothenberger; Joel E Tepper
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of serum-carcinoembryonic antigen in recurrent colorectal cancer: a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Authors:  Hartwig Körner; Kjetil Söreide; Pål Johan Stokkeland; Jon Arne Söreide
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Lymph node counts, rates of positive lymph nodes, and patient survival for colon cancer surgery in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study.

Authors:  Luke Bui; Eddy Rempel; Dana Reeson; Marko Simunovic
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer is associated with lymph node ratio: a single-center analysis of 3,026 patients over a 25-year time period.

Authors:  Robert Rosenberg; Jan Friederichs; Tibor Schuster; Ralf Gertler; Matthias Maak; Karen Becker; Anne Grebner; Kurt Ulm; Heinz Höfler; Hjalmar Nekarda; Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Survival in stage III colon cancer is independent of the total number of lymph nodes retrieved.

Authors:  Vassiliki L Tsikitis; David L Larson; Bruce G Wolff; Gregory Kennedy; Nancy Diehl; Rui Qin; Eric J Dozois; Robert R Cima
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 8.  Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  K Söreide; E A M Janssen; H Söiland; H Körner; J P A Baak
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Colorectal surgeons and biomedical scientists improve lymph node harvest in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Shaw; E E Collins; A Fakis; P Patel; D Semeraro; J N Lund
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Should total number of lymph nodes be used as a quality of care measure for stage III colon cancer?

Authors:  Jiping Wang; Mahmoud Kulaylat; Howard Rockette; James Hassett; Ashwani Rajput; Kelli Bullard Dunn; Merril Dayton
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  32 in total

1.  Lymph node harvest in colon and rectal cancer: Current considerations.

Authors:  James R McDonald; Andrew G Renehan; Sarah T O'Dwyer; Najib Y Haboubi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-01-27

2.  Lymph node yield after colectomy for cancer: is absence of mismatch repair a factor?

Authors:  Tushar Samdani; Molly Schultheis; Zsofia Stadler; Jinru Shia; Tiffany Fancher; Justine Misholy; Martin R Weiser; Garrett M Nash
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Moving from lymph nodes measurement to standardizing colon cancer surgery: letter to the editor.

Authors:  Christof Hottenrott
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Colon Adenocarcinoma Stage IIA-Can We Predict Relapse?

Authors:  João Cortez Pinto; Isadora Rosa; Catarina Martins; Inês Marques; João Pereira da Silva; Ricardo Fonseca; João Freire; António Dias Pereira
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2020-03

Review 5.  A nodal positivity constant: new perspectives in lymph node evaluation and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Niamh M Hogan; Desmond C Winter
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Extended lymphadenectomy in colon cancer is debatable.

Authors:  Jamie Murphy; Tonia Young-Fadok
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Tumor location is a prognostic factor in poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma, and signet-ring cell carcinoma of the colon.

Authors:  Soichiro Ishihara; Toshiaki Watanabe; Takuya Akahane; Ryu Shimada; Atsushi Horiuchi; Hajime Shibuya; Tamuro Hayama; Hideki Yamada; Keijiro Nozawa; Keiji Matsuda; Koutarou Maeda; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 8.  Colorectal cancer and lymph nodes: the obsession with the number 12.

Authors:  Giovanni Li Destri; Isidoro Di Carlo; Roberto Scilletta; Beniamino Scilletta; Stefano Puleo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Non-surgical factors influencing lymph node yield in colon cancer.

Authors:  Patrick Wood; Colin Peirce; Jurgen Mulsow
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-05-15

10.  The complexity of the count: considerations regarding lymph node evaluation in colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Laura J Denham; Justin C Kerstetter; Paul C Herrmann
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2012-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.