Literature DB >> 19823889

A procedure for evaluation of non-invasive blood pressure simulators.

Gregor Gersak1, Ales Zemva, Janko Drnovsek.   

Abstract

Non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) simulators are used in clinical environment for quick checks of blood pressure monitors as a part of technical maintenance and health-care quality assurance system. They are also included in various tests within the procedures for testing NIBP monitors. In practice simulators are often subject to mechanical and electromagnetic shocks which could effect their measuring function. Our objective was to design a procedure for testing the reliability and quality of simulators in order to ensure reliable testing of NIBP monitors. Procedure for evaluation of NIBP simulators, consisting of a static and dynamic test, is proposed. Static test consisted of procedures derived from common electro-mechanical manometer calibration, while dynamic test included testing of repeatability of simulator's output. A commercial simulator was tested. Among others, the results indicated that evaluations of NIBP simulators should be performed regularly with a suitable time interval in order to track the metrological quality of the simulator in time. Acceptance criteria for a reliable simulator in both static and dynamic sense are proposed.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19823889     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-009-0532-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  11 in total

1.  A simulation-based evaluation of nine oscillometric blood pressure monitors for self-measurement.

Authors:  K G Ng
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2000 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.444

2.  Measurement variation among 12 electronic home blood pressure monitors.

Authors:  S A Yarows; R D Brook
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.689

3.  Can simulators evaluate systematic differences between oscillometric non-invasive blood-pressure monitors?

Authors:  J N Amoore; D H Scott
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.444

4.  Substitute of simulators for human subjects.

Authors: 
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.444

5.  An evaluation of three oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure simulators.

Authors:  J N Amoore; W B Geake
Journal:  J Clin Eng       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr

Review 6.  Update on methods & simulators for evaluation of noninvasive blood pressure monitors.

Authors:  K G Ng; C F Small
Journal:  J Clin Eng       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr

Review 7.  Review of methods & simulators for evaluation of noninvasive blood pressure monitors.

Authors:  K G Ng; C F Small
Journal:  J Clin Eng       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec

8.  Oscillometric blood pressure devices and simulators: measurements of repeatability and differences between models.

Authors:  A J Sims; C A Reay; D R Bousfield; J A Menes; A Murray
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  2005 May-Jun

9.  Can a simulator that regenerates physiological waveforms evaluate oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure devices?

Authors:  John N Amoore; Emilie Vacher; Ian C Murray; Stephan Mieke; Susan T King; Fiona E Smith; Alan Murray
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.444

10.  Evaluation of the A&D UA-767 and Welch Allyn Spot Vital Signs noninvasive blood pressure monitors using a blood pressure simulator.

Authors:  P D Davis; J L Dennis; R Railton
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.012

View more
  3 in total

1.  Short and longer term repeatability of ballistocardiography in a sitting position with EMFi sensor.

Authors:  Jarmo Alametsä; Ari Palomäki; Jari Viik
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  A convenient method to verify the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure monitors by the auscultatory method: A smartphone-based app.

Authors:  Zhi Zhang; Weichun Xi; Bingjiang Wang; Guang Chu; Fang Wang
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Electrodermal activity patient simulator.

Authors:  Gregor Geršak; Janko Drnovšek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.