Literature DB >> 19822390

Quantification of flow using ultrasound and microbubbles: a disruption replenishment model based on physical principles.

John M Hudson1, Raffi Karshafian, Peter N Burns.   

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a promising clinical tool capable of noninvasively quantifying flow and relative vascular volume within the microcirculation. Quantification can be performed by recording the replenishment intensity time course of the imaging plane after the local disruption of agent during a constant infusion. Traditional analyses of the time-intensity curves have relied on mathematical functions (e.g., mono-exponential) that fail to consider the underlying physical principles of the flow system and the influence of the measurement device. In reality, the time-intensity curve reflects the hemodynamics and morphology of the vascular system being measured, the ultrasound field distribution and microbubble properties. We introduce a general analytic disruption replenishment model that attempts to account for these parameters and compare its performance to the established model in a flow phantom. Specifically, the proposed model incorporates the hemodynamic properties of the flow system (velocity distribution and vascular cross section); includes the elevation and axial plane pressure distributions; and accounts for the distinct high and low mechanical index (MI) disruption and detection boundaries. In addition, we demonstrated the importance of the ultrasound beam profile for accurate velocity quantification. It was shown that velocity estimates vary by up to 56% if the depth-dependent elevation thickness is not properly accounted for. Compared with the currently accepted mono-exponential model, the presented formalism was shown to be more robust in the presence of simulated motion artifacts and demonstrated better agreement in both the quality of the fit and estimation of velocity (approximately 3 to 10% vs. 90% error) for the same flow and acoustic conditions.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19822390     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.06.1102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  32 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound imaging of synovial inflammation in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Authors:  Nancy A Chauvin; Andrea S Doria
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-08-04

2.  Dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound assessment of the vascular effects of novel therapeutics in early stage trials.

Authors:  Edward Leen; Michalakis Averkiou; Marcel Arditi; Peter Burns; Daniela Bokor; Thomas Gauthier; Yuko Kono; Olivier Lucidarme
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Correlation of ultrasound contrast agent derived blood flow parameters with immunohistochemical angiogenesis markers in murine xenograft tumor models.

Authors:  John R Eisenbrey; Christian C Wilson; Raymond J Ro; Traci B Fox; Ji-Bin Liu; See-Ying Chiou; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  [Summary of technical principles of contrast sonography and future perspectives].

Authors:  C Greis
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Assessment of the Superharmonic Response of Microbubble Contrast Agents for Acoustic Angiography as a Function of Microbubble Parameters.

Authors:  Isabel G Newsome; Thomas M Kierski; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Parametric subharmonic imaging using a commercial intravascular ultrasound scanner: an in vivo feasibility study.

Authors:  John R Eisenbrey; Anush Sridharan; Ebo D deMuinck; Marvin M Doyley; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging: a review of sources of variability.

Authors:  M-X Tang; H Mulvana; T Gauthier; A K P Lim; D O Cosgrove; R J Eckersley; E Stride
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  Micro-ultrasound for preclinical imaging.

Authors:  F Stuart Foster; John Hossack; S Lee Adamson
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.906

9.  Effects of high-fat diet and losartan on renal cortical blood flow using contrast ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Anne-Emilie Declèves; Joshua J Rychak; Dan J Smith; Kumar Sharma
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2013-09-18

Review 10.  The role of functional imaging in the era of targeted therapy of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Margarita Braunagel; Anno Graser; Maximilian Reiser; Mike Notohamiprodjo
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.