Literature DB >> 23659876

Correlation of ultrasound contrast agent derived blood flow parameters with immunohistochemical angiogenesis markers in murine xenograft tumor models.

John R Eisenbrey1, Christian C Wilson, Raymond J Ro, Traci B Fox, Ji-Bin Liu, See-Ying Chiou, Flemming Forsberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this study we used temporal analysis of ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) estimate blood flow dynamics and demonstrate their improved correlation to angiogenesis markers relative to previously reported, non-temporal fractional vascularity estimates.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Breast tumor (NMU) or glioma (C6) cells were implanted in either the abdomen or thigh of 144 rats. After 6, 8 or 10 days, rats received a bolus UCA injection of Optison (GE Healthcare, Princeton, NJ; 0.4 ml/kg) during power Doppler imaging (PDI), harmonic imaging (HI), and microflow imaging (MFI) using an Aplio ultrasound scanner with 7.5 MHz linear array (Toshiba America Medical Systems, Tustin, CA). Time-intensity curves of contrast wash-in were constructed on a pixel-by-pixel basis and averaged to calculate maximum intensity, time to peak, perfusion, and time integrated intensity (TII). Tumors were then stained for four immunohistochemical markers (bFGF, CD31, COX-2, and VEGF). Correlations between temporal parameters and the angiogenesis markers were investigated for each imaging mode. Effects of tumor model and implant location on these correlations were also investigated.
RESULTS: Significant correlation over the entire dataset was only observed between TII and VEGF for all three imaging modes (R=-0.35, -0.54, -0.32 for PDI, HI and MFI, respectively; p<0.0001). Tumor type and location affected these correlations, with the strongest correlation of TII to VEGF found to be with implanted C6 cells (R=-0.43, -0.54, -0.52 for PDI, HI and MFI, respectively; p<0.0002).
CONCLUSIONS: While UCA-derived temporal blood flow parameters were found to correlate strongly with VEGF expression, these correlations were also found to be influenced by both tumor type and implant location.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23659876      PMCID: PMC3696523          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2013.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  34 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of perfusion using ultrasound.

Authors:  David Cosgrove; Nathalie Lassau
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Microbubble contrast agents: targeted ultrasound imaging and ultrasound-assisted drug-delivery applications.

Authors:  Alexander L Klibanov
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Comparing contrast-enhanced color flow imaging and pathological measures of breast lesion vascularity.

Authors:  Flemming Forsberg; Babita Kuruvilla; Mark B Pascua; Manisha H Chaudhari; Daniel A Merton; Juan P Palazzo; Barry B Goldberg
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Ultrasound contrast agents as markers of vascularity and microcirculation.

Authors:  Christian Greis
Journal:  Clin Hemorheol Microcirc       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Assessment of quantitative perfusion parameters by dynamic contrast-enhanced sonography using a deconvolution method: an in vitro and in vivo study.

Authors:  Marianne Gauthier; Farid Tabarout; Ingrid Leguerney; Mélanie Polrot; Stéphanie Pitre; Pierre Peronneau; Nathalie Lassau
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Reproducibility of quantitative assessment of altered hepatic hemodynamics with dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Thomas P Gauthier; Aun Muhammad; Harpreet S Wasan; Paul D Abel; Edward L S Leen
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with imatinib: monitoring response with contrast-enhanced sonography.

Authors:  Nathalie Lassau; Michele Lamuraglia; Linda Chami; Jerome Leclère; Sylvie Bonvalot; Philippe Terrier; Alain Roche; Axel Le Cesne
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Time-intensity curve parameters in colorectal tumours measured using double contrast-enhanced ultrasound: correlations with tumour angiogenesis.

Authors:  H Zhuang; Z-G Yang; H-J Chen; Y-L Peng; L Li
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Comparing contrast-enhanced ultrasound to immunohistochemical markers of angiogenesis in a human melanoma xenograft model: preliminary results.

Authors:  Flemming Forsberg; Adam P Dicker; Mattew L Thakur; Nandkumar M Rawool; Ji-Bin Liu; William T Shi; Levon N Nazarian
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Contrast enhanced ultrasound flash replenishment method for directed prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Robert A Linden; Edouard J Trabulsi; Flemming Forsberg; Paul R Gittens; Leonard G Gomella; Ethan J Halpern
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  5 in total

1.  Sonoporation for Augmenting Chemotherapy of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jason Castle; Spiros Kotopoulis; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2020

2.  The antiangiogenic effects of a vascular endothelial growth factor decoy receptor can be monitored in vivo using contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Flemming Forsberg; Raymond J Ro; Andrew Marshall; Ji-Bin Liu; See-Ying Chiou; Daniel A Merton; Priscilla Machado; Adam P Dicker; Levon N Nazarian
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.488

Review 3.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in interventional oncology.

Authors:  Sriharsha Gummadi; John R Eisenbrey; Andrej Lyshchik
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-11

4.  Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound with VEGFR2-Targeted Microbubbles for Monitoring Regorafenib Therapy Effects in Experimental Colorectal Adenocarcinomas in Rats with DCE-MRI and Immunohistochemical Validation.

Authors:  Ralf Stefan Eschbach; Dirk-Andre Clevert; Heidrun Hirner-Eppeneder; Michael Ingrisch; Matthias Moser; Jessica Schuster; Dina Tadros; Moritz Schneider; Philipp Maximilian Kazmierczak; Maximilian Reiser; Clemens C Cyran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  In vivo longitudinal and multimodal imaging of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α and angiogenesis in breast cancer.

Authors:  He-Wen Tang; Hai-Liang Feng; Ming Wang; Qing-Li Zhu; Yu-Qin Liu; Yu-Xin Jiang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.628

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.