Literature DB >> 15339322

Projections of demand and capacity for colonoscopy related to increasing rates of colorectal cancer screening in the United States.

S Vijan1, J Inadomi, R A Hayward, T P Hofer, A M Fendrick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is debate about the optimal colorectal cancer screening test, partly because of concerns about colonoscopy demand. AIM: To quantify the demand for colonoscopy with different screening tests, and to estimate the ability of the United States health care system to meet demand.
METHODS: We used a previously published Markov model and the United States census data to estimate colonoscopy demand. We then used an endoscopic database to compare current rates of screening-related colonoscopy with those projected by the model, and to estimate the number of endoscopists needed to meet colonoscopy demand.
RESULTS: Annual demand for colonoscopy ranges from 2.21 to 7.96 million. Based on current practice patterns, demand exceeds current supply regardless of screening strategy. We estimate that an increase of at least 1360 gastroenterologists would be necessary to meet demand for colonoscopic screening undergone once at age 65, while colonoscopy every 10 years could require 32 700 more gastroenterologists. A system using dedicated endoscopists could meet demand with fewer endoscopists.
CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal cancer screening leads to demand for colonoscopy that outstrips supply. Systems to train dedicated screening endoscopists may be necessary in order to provide population-wide screening. The costs and feasibility of establishing this infrastructure should be studied further. Copyright 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15339322     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01960.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0269-2813            Impact factor:   8.171


  39 in total

1.  Colonoscopist and primary care physician supply and disparities in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Jaime Benarroch-Gampel; Kristin M Sheffield; Yu-Li Lin; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Quality and safety of screening colonoscopies performed by primary care physicians with standby specialist support.

Authors:  Sudha Xirasagar; Thomas G Hurley; Lekhena Sros; James R Hebert
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Surgeon-initiated screening colonoscopy program based on SAGES and ASCRS recommendations in a general surgery practice.

Authors:  E A Goldenberg; L Khaitan; I-P Huang; C D Smith; E Lin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Awareness of postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines: a nationwide survey of colonoscopists in Canada.

Authors:  Harmke van Kooten; Vincent de Jonge; Eline Schreuders; Jerome Sint Nicolaas; Monique E van Leerdam; Ernst J Kuipers; Sander J O Veldhuyzen van Zanten
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.522

5.  Do colorectal cancer patients understand that their family is at risk?

Authors:  David T Rubin; Rishi K Gandhi; Jeremy T Hetzel; Sydney H Kinnear; Andrew Aronsohn; Gordon Wood; Nicole Yadron
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  How can the over-use of surveillance colonoscopy after polypectomy be modified?

Authors:  Sung Pil Hong; Won Ho Kim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Socioeconomic and physician supply determinants of racial disparities in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Samir Soneji; Katrina Armstrong; David A Asch
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Assessing individual risk for high-risk colorectal adenoma at first-time screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Kana Wu; Edward L Giovannucci; Yin Cao; Bernard A Rosner; Jing Ma; Rulla M Tamimi; Andrew T Chan; Charles S Fuchs
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Colonoscopic splenic injuries: incidence and management.

Authors:  Ashwin S Kamath; Corey W Iqbal; Michael G Sarr; Daniel C Cullinane; Scott P Zietlow; David R Farley; Mark D Sawyer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Predictors of endoscopic colorectal cancer screening over time in 11 states.

Authors:  Lee Mobley; Tzy-Mey Kuo; Matthew Urato; John Boos; Nancy Lozano-Gracia; Luc Anselin
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.