Literature DB >> 19817747

Short-term outcomes of the prospective multicentre 'Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance' study.

Roderick C N van den Bergh1, Hanna Vasarainen, Henk G van der Poel, Jenneke J Vis-Maters, John B Rietbergen, Tom Pickles, Erik B Cornel, Riccardo Valdagni, Joris J Jaspars, John van der Hoeven, Frederic Staerman, Eric H G M Oomens, Antti Rannikko, Stijn Roemeling, Ewout W Steyerberg, Monique J Roobol, Fritz H Schröder, Chris H Bangma.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short-term outcomes of the prospective international Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance ('PRIAS') study (Dutch Trial Register NTR1718), as active surveillance (AS) for early prostate cancer might provide a partial solution to the current overtreatment dilemma in this disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The first 500 (of >950) participants with asymptomatic T1c/T2 prostate cancer, with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of < or =10.0 ng/mL, a PSA density of <0.2 ng/mL/mL, a Gleason score of < or =3 + 3 = 6, and one or two positive biopsy cores, were analysed. The follow-up protocol consisted of frequent PSA measurements, digital rectal examinations, and standard repeat biopsies (the first after 1 year). The primary outcome is survival free of active therapy; the secondary endpoints are reasons for stopping AS, findings in 1-year repeat biopsies, and outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP).
RESULTS: Patients were included between December 2006 and July 2008. The median (25-75th percentile) follow-up after diagnosis was 1.02 (0.6-1.5) years. The 2-year survival rate free from active therapy was 73%. Of the 82 men who changed to active therapy during the follow-up, 68 (83%) did so based on the protocol. Of the 261 repeat biopsies available for analysis, 90 (34%) showed no cancer, while 57 (22%) showed a Gleason score of >6 or more than two positive biopsy cores. There was a relatively unfavourable PSA doubling time of 0-10 years in 53% (102/194) and 62% (33/53) of men with favourable and unfavourable re-biopsy results, respectively. After RP, four of 24 (17%) men had T3 disease and 12 (50%) had a Gleason score of >6.
CONCLUSION: AS seems feasible, but mortality outcomes are unknown. A strict follow-up protocol including standard 1-year repeat biopsies resulted in a quarter of men stopping AS after 2 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19817747     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08887.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  53 in total

1.  [Patterns of care of patients with localized prostate cancer in Germany: a health care study with focus on active surveillance].

Authors:  F K H Chun; A Becker; L A Kluth; D Seiler; D Schnell; M Fisch; M Graefen; L Weissbach
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Trevor A Flood; Nicola Schieda; Daniel T Keefe; Rodney H Breau; Chris Morash; Kevin Hogan; Eric C Belanger; Kien T Mai; Susan J Robertson
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-07-10       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Predicting Gleason Group Progression for Men on Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance: Role of a Negative Confirmatory Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy.

Authors:  Jonathan B Bloom; Graham R Hale; Samuel A Gold; Kareem N Rayn; Clayton Smith; Sherif Mehralivand; Marcin Czarniecki; Vladimir Valera; Bradford J Wood; Maria J Merino; Peter L Choyke; Howard L Parnes; Baris Turkbey; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  [Active surveillance of low risk prostate cancer].

Authors:  K Lellig; B Beyer; M Graefen; D Zaak; C Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Characterizing indeterminate (Likert-score 3/5) peripheral zone prostate lesions with PSA density, PI-RADS scoring and qualitative descriptors on multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Mrishta Brizmohun Appayya; Harbir S Sidhu; Nikolaos Dikaios; Edward W Johnston; Lucy Am Simmons; Alex Freeman; Alexander Ps Kirkham; Hashim U Ahmed; Shonit Punwani
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of clinicopathologic variables and biomarkers for risk stratification.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Sophie M Bruinsma; Joseph Nicholson; Alberto Briganti; Tom Pickles; Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Sigrid V Carlsson; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Population-based study of grade progression in patients who harboured Gleason 3 + 3.

Authors:  Fanny Sampurno; Arul Earnest; Jeremy Millar; Mark Frydenberg; Declan Murphy; Warwick Delprado; Sue Evans
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer: background, patient selection, triggers for intervention, and outcomes.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  A comparative assessment of active surveillance for localized prostate cancer in the community versus tertiary care referral center.

Authors:  Andreas Becker; Daniel Seiler; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Luis Alex Kluth; Dietrich Schnell; Markus Graefen; Thorsten Schlomm; Margit Fisch; Franz Recker; Lothar Weissbach; Felix K H Chun
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  A population-based analysis of contemporary patterns of care in younger men (<60 years old) with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrew T Wong; Joseph J Safdieh; Justin Rineer; Joseph Weiner; David Schwartz; David Schreiber
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.