Literature DB >> 27394432

Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.

Trevor A Flood1, Nicola Schieda2,3, Daniel T Keefe2,4, Rodney H Breau2,4, Chris Morash2,4, Kevin Hogan2, Eric C Belanger2, Kien T Mai2, Susan J Robertson2.   

Abstract

Selected patients with Gleason score (GS) 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer (PCa) detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies may be considered for active surveillance (AS); however, a proportion of these will harbor more aggressive disease. The purpose of this study was to determine if morphologies of Gleason pattern 4 PCa may predict upgrading and/or upstaging after radical prostatectomy (RP). A database search for men with GS 3 + 4 = 7 PCa diagnosed on TRUS-guided biopsy that underwent RP between January 2010 and October 2015 identified 152 patients. Two blinded genitourinary pathologists independently reviewed the biopsies and assessed ill-defined glands (IDG), fused glands, small or large cribriform patterns, and glomerulations. Patient age, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), percentage (%) of biopsy sites involved by 3 + 4 = 7 PCa, and overall extent of pattern 4 were also recorded. GS and stage (presence or absence of extraprostatic extension [EPE]) were retrieved from RP reports. Data were compared using independent t tests and chi-square. Inter-observer agreement was calculated using Cohen's Kappa statistic. Percent of biopsy sites and extent of pattern 4 were compared to statistically significant morphologies using the Spearman correlation. 28.3 % (43/152) of patients were upgraded to GS >3 + 4 = 7 at RP (GS 4 + 3 = 7 [N = 17], GS 4 + 3 = 7 with tertiary pattern 5 [N = 25], and GS 4 + 5 = 9 [N = 1]) and 44.1 % (67/152) showed EPE after RP. PSA was associated with both upgrading (8.5 ± 5.4 vs. 6.9 ± 3.2 ng/mL, [p = 0.04]) and EPE (8.2 ± 4.6 vs. 6.7 ± 3.2 ng/mL, [p = 0.03]). IDG, fused glands, and glomerulations were not associated with upgrading or EPE (p > 0.05) with moderate to strong inter-observer agreement (K = 0.76-0.88). There was strong inter-observer agreement for small and large cribriform formations (K = 0.93 and 0.94, respectively) and both patterns were strongly associated with upgrading (p < 0.001) and EPE (p = 0.02) on RP. Strong associations were observed between increasing number of morphologies and both upgrading (p = 0.0.25) and EPE (p < 0.001). Overall extent of pattern 4 was associated with upgrading (p = 0.009) and EPE (p = 0.019) while percent of sites involved by GS 3 + 4 = 7 was only associated with EPE (p = 0.023). Cribriform morphology correlated to percentage of sites with 3 + 4 and overall extent of pattern 4 (rho = 0.25, p = 0.002, rho = 0.20, p = 0.015, respectively). Presence of cribriform morphology on TRUS-guided biopsy is strongly associated with upgrading and upstaging at RP and shows near-perfect inter-observer agreement whereas IDG, fused glands, and glomerulations were not useful. Cribriform morphology may be of importance when considering treatment plans for patients with intermediate risk PCa.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active surveillance; Cribriform morphology; Gleason score; Prostate; Prostate cancer; TRUS-guided needle biopsy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27394432     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-016-1981-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  28 in total

Review 1.  The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein; William C Allsbrook; Mahul B Amin; Lars L Egevad
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Prospective validation of active surveillance in prostate cancer: the PRIAS study.

Authors:  Roderick C N van den Bergh; Stijn Roemeling; Monique J Roobol; Wouter Roobol; Fritz H Schröder; Chris H Bangma
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Cribriform growth is highly predictive for postoperative metastasis and disease-specific death in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Charlotte F Kweldam; Mark F Wildhagen; Ewout W Steyerberg; Chris H Bangma; Theodorus H van der Kwast; Geert J L H van Leenders
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 4.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Marc A Dall'Era; Peter C Albertsen; Christopher Bangma; Peter R Carroll; H Ballentine Carter; Matthew R Cooperberg; Stephen J Freedland; Laurence H Klotz; Christopher Parker; Mark S Soloway
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  A multi-institutional evaluation of active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Scott E Eggener; Alex Mueller; Ryan K Berglund; Raj Ayyathurai; Cindy Soloway; Mark S Soloway; Robert Abouassaly; Eric A Klein; Steven J Jones; Chris Zappavigna; Larry Goldenberg; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Bertrand Guillonneau
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Outcomes in localized prostate cancer: National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden follow-up study.

Authors:  Pär Stattin; Erik Holmberg; Jan-Erik Johansson; Lars Holmberg; Jan Adolfsson; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.

Authors:  Daniel T Keefe; Nicola Schieda; Soufiane El Hallani; Rodney H Breau; Chris Morash; Susan J Robertson; Kien T Mai; Eric C Belanger; Trevor A Flood
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Architectural heterogeneity and cribriform pattern predict adverse clinical outcome for Gleason grade 4 prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Fei Dong; Ping Yang; Chaofu Wang; Shulin Wu; Yu Xiao; W Scott McDougal; Robert H Young; Chin-Lee Wu
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 6.394

9.  Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz; Liying Zhang; Adam Lam; Robert Nam; Alexandre Mamedov; Andrew Loblaw
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Gleason score 3 + 4=7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen.

Authors:  Cheng Cheng Huang; Max Xiangtian Kong; Ming Zhou; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Samir S Taneja; Jonathan Melamed; Fang-Ming Deng
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 6.394

View more
  9 in total

1.  Presence of invasive cribriform or intraductal growth at biopsy outperforms percentage grade 4 in predicting outcome of Gleason score 3+4=7 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Charlotte F Kweldam; Intan P Kümmerlin; Daan Nieboer; Ewout W Steyerberg; Chris H Bangma; Luca Incrocci; Theodorus H van der Kwast; Monique J Roobol; Geert J van Leenders
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Digital versus light microscopy assessment of extraprostatic extension in radical prostatectomy samples.

Authors:  Metka Volavšek; Vanessa Henriques; Ana Blanca; Rodolfo Montironi; Liang Cheng; Maria R Raspollini; Alessia Cimadamore; Nuno Vau; Francesco Pierconti; Antonio Lopez-Beltran
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 3.  Concomitant bladder cancer and prostate cancer: challenges and controversies.

Authors:  Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Liang Cheng; Francesco Montorsi; Maria Scarpelli; Maria R Raspollini; Rodolfo Montironi
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Characterization of a "low-risk" cohort of grade group 2 prostate cancer patients: Results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.

Authors:  Kathleen F McGinley; Xizi Sun; Lauren E Howard; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Christopher J Kane; Christopher L Amling; Matthew R Cooperberg; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.369

5.  Evaluation of tumor morphologies and association with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in grade group 5 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Trevor A Flood; Nicola Schieda; Jordan Sim; Rodney H Breau; Chris Morash; Eric C Belanger; Susan J Robertson
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Prostate cancer growth patterns beyond the Gleason score: entering a new era of comprehensive tumour grading.

Authors:  Geert J L H van Leenders; Esther I Verhoef; Eva Hollemans
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2020-09-13       Impact factor: 5.087

7.  Large and small cribriform architecture have similar adverse clinical outcome on prostate cancer biopsies.

Authors:  L Lucia Rijstenberg; Tim Hansum; Charlotte F Kweldam; Intan P Kümmerlin; Sebastiaan Remmers; Monique J Roobol; Geert J L H van Leenders
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 7.778

Review 8.  WHO Classification of Tumours fifth edition: evolving issues in the classification, diagnosis, and prognostication of prostate cancer.

Authors:  James G Kench; Mahul B Amin; Daniel M Berney; Eva M Compérat; Ian A Cree; Anthony J Gill; Arndt Hartmann; Santosh Menon; Holger Moch; George J Netto; Maria R Raspollini; Mark A Rubin; Puay Hoon Tan; Toyonori Tsuzuki; Samra Turjalic; Theo H van der Kwast; Ming Zhou; John R Srigley
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 7.778

9.  Beyond the Gleason score: the prognostic significance of prostate cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Trevor A Flood; Nicola Schieda
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.